Duration 90 minutes - https://zoom.us/j/661303200
Due to the Chinese Holiday season, our next TSC call (2/7) will be transformed into an open and constructive session with the ONAP Community.
No TSC Vote during the week of Feb 4th.
Wishing you a Happy Chinese New Year !
| Agenda Items | Presented By | Time | Notes/Links | JIRA Tasks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Any Infrastructure Improvement/Plan | 5mins | Any LF showstopper
Completed #60449 - Waiting feedback from from Vexx on the plugin that the teams can use to manage the volumes; Waiting on DCAE Feedback to validate [ONAP Helpdesk #67660] REQUEST: ONAP Access to NexusIQ scans and the Security Vulnerabilities wiki space SDC Commiter's Promotion (Priyanshu Agarwal) NexusIQ/CLM - Mandar - DMaaP Security SME | TSC-78 - Getting issue details... STATUS | |
Subcommittee Update -Security | 10min | Review of M2-M4 Checklist Proposed Updates to Release Templates (Dublin) - Security Questions | ||
| POC definition proposal | 10min | |||
| TSC activities and Deadlines | Feedback about Security Chair & Special TSC Seat elections:
| |||
| Incoming ONAP Events | 5 mins | San Jose - April 1st & 2nd 2019 ONAP Joint Subcommittees Silicon Valley San Jose - April 3rd to 5th - https://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/open-networking-summit-north-america-2019/ | ||
| OPEN Topic time | Please bring your topics for open discussion time | |||
Action Items:
- (TSC) Finalize discussions about the Infrastructure Role
- (Owners/PTLs) Close the actions captured on the Dublin Requirements wiki
- (Jim): Provide POC Definition to be reviewed by TSC
- (Amy Zwarico): Security by design - work with the PTLs on missing JIRA vulnerability issues
- (TSC): Create a Task force to work on the ONAP component dependency
- (TSC): To review project maturity (incubation, etc.)
- (TSC ): To send Integration/Pair-wise testing proposal again
- (TSC & Modeling Chairs): Finalize Dublin M2-M4 Modeling Checklist Review
- (TSC & Security Subcommittee): Finalize Dublin M2-M4 Security Checklist Review
- (SECCOM): Collect feedback from PTLS concernig running dockers as non-root prior the next PTL Call (2/11)
- (Michael O'Brien): Remind PTLs about the wiki page where we are consolidating the external port list - OOM NodePort List
- (Jason): Upgrade path not committed; work with PTLs to define the strict minimum?
- (SECCOM): Footprint Optimization - is there any recommendation from SECCOM?
- (Footprint Optimization Task Force): Define clear strategy - can Alpine be optional? The current strategy is that the Integration Team will use the Alpine for the Dublin Certification - how shall we move forward based on today's feedback?