The content of this template is expected to be fill out for M1 Release Planning Milestone.
Info
Use the "Copy" and "Move" options (available under the ..., top right of this page) to duplicate this template into your project wiki.
Use the Wiki to document the release plan. Don't provide PowerPoint.
Use as much diagrams and flow charts as you need, directly in the wiki, to convey your message.
Overview
| Project Name | Enter the name of the project |
|---|---|
| Target Release Name | Honolulu |
| Project Lifecycle State | Mature |
| Participating Companies | AT&T, Bell Canada, Fujitsu, Ericsson, IBM, Huawei, Nokia, Orange, Samsung, Tech Mahindra, Wipro |
Scope
What is this release trying to address?
The Honolulu release contains a number of enhancements primarily centered around 5G use cases and ORAN integration.
We are completing work begun in the Guilin release to create a springboot-based microservice which will offer the SLI-API (used by healthcheck) and GENERIC-RESOURCE-APIs. We will regression test our GR-API flows against both the current, OpenDaylight based implementation and the springboot-based version to validate that backward compatibility has been maintained.
Requirements
The following table lists the new functional requirements CCSDK is committing to support for the Honolulu Release:
| Requirements | Companies Supporting Requirement |
|---|---|
REQ-458 - Getting issue details... STATUS | Orange, Samsung |
REQ-457 - Getting issue details... STATUS | Ericcson-EST |
REQ-439 - Getting issue details... STATUS | AT&T |
REQ-438 - Getting issue details... STATUS | AT&T |
REQ-437 - Getting issue details... STATUS | AT&T |
REQ-432 - Getting issue details... STATUS | Nokia, Orange, Ericcson, Highstreet |
Minimum Viable Product
The following epics represent the minimum viable product of the SDNC Honolulu Release:
The following epics are also in scope for Honolulu, but are not considered of the minimum viable product. In the event of unanticipated resource constraints, these could be reduced in scope or deferred without impacting any functionality deemed by the TSC as critical for Honolulu.
Functionalities
List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.
Epics
The following epics are committed for the SDNC Honolulu Release:
The following epics are also in scope for Honolulu, but are not considered of the minimum viable product. In the event of unanticipated resource constraints, these could be reduced in scope or deferred without impacting any functionality deemed by the TSC as critical for Honolulu.
Stories
Bugs
Longer term roadmap
Indicate at a high level the longer term roadmap. This is to put things into the big perspective.
Release Deliverables
Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note, etc) of this release.
| Deliverable Name | Deliverable Description | Deliverable Location |
|---|---|---|
| SDNC Source Code | Source code for SDNC project | ONAP gerrit |
| SDNC Maven Artifacts | Compiled code that can be referenced in other projects as maven dependencies | ONAP Nexus |
| SDNC Docker Containers | Docker containers associated with SDNC project:
| ONAP Nexus |
| Documentation | User and developer guides | ONAP Wiki |
| SDNC CI/CD automation | Scripts to automate compilation and deployment of maven artifacts and docker containers | ONAP gerrit ONAP Jenkins |
Sub-Components
Please see the INFO.yaml files associated with each repo as the authoritative sources of information. https://gerrit.onap.org/r/admin/repos/q/filter:sdnc
ONAP Dependencies
SDN-C depends on the following projects:
- Active and Available Inventory (A&AI)
- Common Controller SDK (CCSDK).
- Service Design and Creation (SDC)
- Data Movement as a Platform (DMaaP)
- Documentation
- Integration
- External API
- Modeling
- Multi VIM/Cloud
- Policy
Architecture
High level architecture diagram
The following diagram shows the high level architecture of SDNC:
The major architectural components of the SDN-C controller are:
- Device Data Models : Yang models that define interfaces to devices (virtual or physical) that the SDNC configures
- Service Network Data Models : Yang models that define data maintained within the SDNC about the network used by the set of services supported by this SDNC instance
- Service Chain Data Models : Yang models that define how services supported by an SDNC instance can be chained
- Service Data Models : Yang models that define data maintained within the SDNC for the set of services it supports
- Directed Graphs : programmable logic, updatable at run time with no restart, that define the behavior of the SDNC
- Service Logic Interpreter : module provided by CCSDK which allows platform to execute directed graphs
- API Handler : code (mostly generate from service Yang models) which implements RESTCONF API into SDNC. Most API handlers should follow the following pattern:
- Call directed graph named after invoked RPC, passing RESTCONF RPC parameters as Java Properties object.
- Return results from directed graph invocation as response to RESTCONF RPC
- Interface adaptors - code that allows directed graphs to invoke external interfaces
Platform Maturity
Please fill out the centralized wiki page: Honolulu Release Platform Maturity
API Incoming Dependencies
| API Name | API Description | API Definition Date | API Delivery date | API Definition link (i.e.swagger) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A&AI : VNF | API used to read/write information about VNFs | Defined in seed code | Included in seed code | TBD |
| SDC : distribution | API used to distribute artifacts from SDC to subscribers | Defined in seed code | Included in seed code | TBD |
| DMaaP | API used to receive DHCP event notification | 8/23/17 | 8/23/17 | DMaaP API |
API Outgoing Dependencies
| API Name | API Description | API Definition Date | API Delivery date | API Definition link (i.e.swagger) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcheck | API used to verify that platform is available and healthy | Included in seed code | Delivered in seed code | TBD (requested Confluence OPEN API to be installed so this can be published on ONAP Wiki) |
| Generic VNF API | API used to request resources for VNFs. Will be deprecated in Beijing in favor of Generic Resource API. Note: This API is deprecated in Frankfurt and will be removed in Guilin | Included in seed code | Delivered in seed code | TBD (requested Confluence OPEN API to be installed so this can be published on ONAP Wiki) |
| Generic Resource API | API used to request resources for VNFs. This API is a superset of the generic VNF API, which it replaces | Included in Amsterdam release | Delivered in Amsterdam | TBD (requested Confluence OPEN API to be installed so this can be published on ONAP Wiki) |
Third Party Products Dependencies
| Name | Description | Version |
|---|---|---|
| OpenDaylight | OpenDaylight SDN Controller Platform | Aluminum SR2 |
Testing and Integration Plans
Provide a description of the testing activities (unit test, functional test, automation,...) that will be performed by the team within the scope of this release.
Describe the plan to integrate and test the release deliverables within the overall ONAP system.
Confirm that resources have been allocated to perform such activities.
Gaps
This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.
| Gaps identified | Impact |
|---|---|
| To fill out | To fill out |
Known Defects and Issues
Please refer to the "Bugs" section above
Risks
List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).
Please update any risk on the centralized wiki page - Honolulu Risks
Resources
Please see the INFO.yaml files associated with each repo as the authoritative sources of information. https://gerrit.onap.org/r/admin/repos/q/filter:sdnc
Release Milestone
The milestones are defined at the Release Planning: Honolulu and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.
Team Internal Milestone
| Milestone | Description | Date | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| M2 | Spec Freeze |
| |
| M3 | Feature Freeze | ||
|
| Last day to submit Honolulu code changes to Gerrit | |
|
|
| |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| | ||
| RC0 | Release Candidate 0 | ||
|
| Last date to submit code fixes for Honolulu RC0 | |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| | ||
| RC1 | Release Candidate 1 | ||
|
| Last date to submit code fixes for Honolulu RC1 | |
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
| RC2 | Release Candidate 2 | ||
|
| Last date to submit code fixes for final Honolulu release (RC2) | |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| | ||
| Release Sign-Off | Final TSC Sign-Off | | Honolulu Release Sign-Off |
Documentation, Training
Please update the following centralized wiki: Honolulu Documentation
That includes
- Team contributions to the specific document related to he project (Config guide, installation guide...).
- Team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset
- High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.
- Documentation includes items such as:
- Installation instructions
- Configuration instructions
- Developer guide
- End User guide
- Admin guide
- ...
Note
The Documentation project will provide the Documentation Tool Chain to edit, configure, store and publish all Documentation asset.
Other Information
Vendor Neutral
If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.
Free and Open Source Software
FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.
Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.
Charter Compliance
The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.