Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

The content of this template is expected to be fill out for M1 Release Planning Milestone.


Overview

Project NameEnter the name of the project
Target Release NameHonolulu
Project Lifecycle StateMature
Participating Company Amdocs, AT&T, ZTE, Huawei, Intel, Nokia, Ericsson, Iconectiv, Vodafone, IBM, TechM, Samsung, CMCC

Scope

What is this release trying to address?

Support Honolulu use cases, Features and Non Functional requirements.

Requirements

Describe the use case this release is targeted for (better if reference to customer requirements).

REQ-342 - E2E Network Slicing requirements for Guilin release

Minimum Viable Product

SDC:

deliver all the need dockers and DB needed to support sdc functionality and the needed scripts for deploying it in OOM.

WORKFLOW:

deliver all the need dockers needed to support workflow designer functionality and the needed scripts for deploying in OOM.

SDC SDK's:

sdc-destribution-client

sdc-tosca

Functionalities

List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.

Requirements Epics for Guilin, impacting SDC

1 Use Case :

Requirement EpicTSC PrioritySDC Epic(s) and/or SDC Story(ies)Committed Contributors

REQ-342 - Getting issue details... STATUS

RANK #3 – PTL GO/NO GO

key summary type updated assignee status resolution
Loading...
Refresh

Confirmed commit from :

SDC - CMCC



5 Functional Requirements :

Requirement EpicTSC PrioritySDC Epic(s) and/or SDC Story(ies)Committed Contributors

REQ-324 - Getting issue details... STATUS

RANK #3 – PTL GO / NO GO

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

Ercisson, Orange OK

REQ-334 - Getting issue details... STATUS

RANK #2 – Continuity 

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

Ericsson support on SDC

see Req Jira for details

REQ-335 - Getting issue details... STATUS

RANK #3 – PTL GO / NO GO

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

China Mobile OK

See discussion in REQ Jira


REQ-341 - Getting issue details... STATUS

RANK #0  – TSC Special GO

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

SDC (S): Lumina, Huawei Orange


stories created and assigned

REQ-353 - Getting issue details... STATUS

RANK #0  – TSC Special GO

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

Ericsson, Nokia OK

Ericsson contributing to 349 NF


18 Non functionals :

10 - TSC MUST HAVE (please indicate where you plan to contribute)

Requirement EpicTSC PrioritySDC Epic(s) and/or SDC Story(ies)Committed Contributors

REQ-323 - Each project will update the vulnerable direct dependencies in their code base To Do

RANK #1 - Must Have

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

  • Contributors : AT&T

Mentee SDC (Amir) supported by AT&T mentor

REQ-366 - Containers must crash properly when a failure occurs To Do
RANK #1 - Must Have

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

  • Contributors : ?
REQ-365 - Containers must have no more than one main process To Do
RANK #1 - Must Have

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

  • Contributors : ?
REQ-380 - ONAP container repository (nexus) must not contain upstream docker images To Do
RANK #1 - Must Have

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

REQ-379 - ONAP projects must use only approved and verified base images for their containers To Do
RANK #1 - Must Have

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

REQ-373 - ONAP must complete update of the Python language (from 2.7 -> 3.8) To Do
RANK #1 - Must Have

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

REQ-362 - All containers must run as non-root user To Do
RANK #1 - Must Have

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

  • Contributors : AT&T
REQ-361 - Continue hardcoded passwords removal To Do
RANK #1 - Must Have

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

  • Contributors : AT&T (Amir if time allows)
  • Remove certificates from containers
REQ-349 - Each ONAP project shall define code coverage improvements and achieve at least 55% code coverage To Do
RANK #1 - Must Have

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

  • Contributors : All (currently at 54.8%)
REQ-351 - ONAP must complete update of the java language (from v8 -> v11) To Do
RANK #1 - Must Have

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

  • Java 11 - need to update many dependencies, very challenging

1 - TSC PRIORITY 2 Continuity (please indicate where you plan to contribute)

REQ-358 - No root (superuser) access to database from application container To Do
RANK #2 – Continuity 

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

  • Not applicable to SDC, as SDC is already using ONAP user on shared Cassandra DB

7- TSC PRIORITY 3 PTL GO/NO GO (please indicate where you plan to contribute)

REQ-340 - ONAP to support Multi - tenancy To Do

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

  • Contributors : YoppWorks, Amdocs

Agreed as a Stretch goal

REQ-374 - ONAP shall use STDOUT for logs collection To Do

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

  • Contributors : ?
REQ-369 - Replace nfs share with storage class as a default deployment option To Do

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

  • Contributors : ?
REQ-364 - Replace NodePorts with ingress controller as a default deployment option To Do

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

  • Contributors : ?
REQ-360 - Application config should be fully prepared before starting the application container To Do

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

  • Contributors : ?
REQ-350 - Each ONAP project shall improve its CII Badging score by improving input validation and documenting it in their CII Badging site. To Do

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

  • Contributors : ?
REQ-359 - Container rootfs must be mounted readOnly To Do

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

  • Contributors : ?


SDC Backlog Overview - Not committed for the release (except for stories that have been captured in the above table), best effort

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

Longer term roadmap

SDC aims to position itself as the main design IDE in ONAP. SDC works towards creating a fully model-driven design experience.

Release Deliverables

Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note, etc) of this release.

Deliverable NameDeliverable Description
SDC Docker ImagesTo fill out
SDC TOSCA
SDC distribution client

Sub-Components

List all sub-components part of this release.
Activities related to sub-components must be in sync with the overall release.

Sub-components are repositories and are consolidated in a single centralized place. Edit the Release Components name for your project in the centralized page.

  • Jtosca
  • SDC Tosca
  • SDC Distribution Client
  • SDC base docker
  • SDC workflow designer 

Architecture

High level architecture diagram

Platform Maturity

Please fill out the centralized wiki page: Guilin Release Platform Maturity


  • API Incoming Dependencies

List the API this project is expecting from other projects.
Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.

Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.

API NameAPI DescriptionAPI Definition DateAPI Delivery dateAPI Definition link (i.e.swagger)
Portaluser management APIsapi for user managementdeliveredexposed by portal sdk
Destribution clientapis for retriving artifacts from catalogdownload artifactsdeliveredexposed by sdc part of external apis.
  • API Outgoing Dependencies

API this project is delivering to other projects.

API NameAPI DescriptionAPI Definition DateAPI Delivery dateAPI Definition link (i.e.swagger)
dmaapusing Cambria clientapi for pushing and retrieving notificationsdeliveredsdk
  • Third Party Products Dependencies

Third Party Products mean products that are mandatory to provide services for your components. Development of new functionality in third party product may or not be expected.
List the Third Party Products (OpenStack, ODL, RabbitMQ, ElasticSearch,Crystal Reports, ...).

NameDescriptionVersion
Cassandra

Open-source distributed storage system

3.1
DockerVM container
JanusGraphOpen-source, distributed graph database

1.0.0

JettyOpen-source application server
9.3.X
UbuntuOpen-source software operating system16.0.4-LTS
vncvnc server used for ui testing
ubuntu-xfce-vnc:1.3.0

In case there are specific dependencies  (Centos 7 vs Ubuntu 16. Etc.) list them as well.

Base docker images with approved set of License to be used to construct SDC base images.


  • Testing and Integration Plans

Provide a description of the testing activities (unit test, functional test, automation,...) that will be performed by the team within the scope of this release.

Describe the plan to integrate and test the release deliverables within the overall ONAP system.
Confirm that resources have been allocated to perform such activities.

  • validate uses cases and pairwise testing of SDC with other components
  • enhance CSIT to include more tests
  • Gaps

This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.

Gaps identifiedImpact
To fill outTo fill out
  • Known Defects and Issues

Please refer to Frankfurt Defect Status  – To be updated when avail


  • Risks

List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).

Please update any risk on the centralized wiki page - Frankfurt Risks – To be updated when avail

  • Resources

Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.

  • Release Milestone

The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.

  • Team Internal Milestone

This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.

It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.

DateProjectDeliverable
To fill outTo fill outTo fill out
  • Documentation, Training

Please update the following centralized wiki: Frankfurt Documentation – To be updated when avail

That includes

  • Team contributions to the specific document related to he project (Config guide, installation guide...).
  • Team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset
  • High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.
  • Documentation includes items such as:
    • Installation instructions
    • Configuration instructions
    • Developer guide
    • End User guide
    • Admin guide
    • ...

Note

The Documentation project will provide the Documentation Tool Chain to edit, configure, store and publish all Documentation asset.


Other Information

  • Vendor Neutral

If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.

  • Free and Open Source Software

FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.

Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.


Charter Compliance

The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.

  • No labels