Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 9 Next »

BRIDGE: https://zoom.us/j/661303200?pwd=TFdRd0c2MTJUem8xa252UGJHTE1Mdz09

Passcode: 209247

2021 TSC Recordings

2021 TSC Decisions

Anti-Trust Policy

We will start our meetings by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.

AttendedProxy (w/ @name)Gov. HolidayDid Not Attend

Attendance is taken purely upon #info in Zoom Chat 

Alla.Goldner

AMDOCS

djhunt proxy PADMASANKAR JADU

IBM

Andreas Geißler

DT

Lingli Deng proxy Yuanhong Deng

China Mobile

Bin Yang

WindRiver

Murat Turpçu 

Turk Telecom

cl664y@att.com

AT&T

Former user (Deleted)

Reliance Jio

Ciaran Johnston proxy Byung-Woo Jun

Ericsson

Martin Vezeau

Bell Canada


Vodafone

Ranny Haiby

Samsung

Dong Wang

China Telecom

Seshu Kumar Mudiganti

Huawei

Eric Debeau

Orange

Srinivasa Addepalli

Intel

Fernando Oliveira

Verizon

Timo Perala proxy damian.nowak

Nokia

Agenda Items

Presented By

Presos/Notes/Links/

Release Status

David McBride

Weekly status

Release Status

cl664y@att.com

Istanbul: Test criteria for certifying the release

  • cl664y@att.com attach the slides shared today to these minutes  

Integration Criteria for Stability/Resiliency Testing

  • what is the criteria that the TSC believes should be the threshold?
  • DT looking at test cases that can be unstreamed
  • Resiliency testing is a bit chaotic - intentional "breaking" of components in the stack
  • Stability Test Run - Success Rate between 85-90%?

#AGREED TSC approves that for Istanbul we maintain the current stability/resiliency acceptance criteria until  community members raise an improvement request to be assessed for the next release.

Security Testing:

  • discussion with SECCOM - belief is that security should be at 100% to certify a release.
  • sometimes false positives and unmaintained projects impact the ability to pass
  • 9 pods currently failing root pod test
  • exception lists need to be better documented - exceptions are excluded from testing.
  • example:  ESR is not excluded and no exception has been filed yet.
  • #AGREED since  the TSC is approving unmaintained projects in a release the exception filing should be made by the TSC itself.
  • Moving closer to CII Silver badging - Silver not yet a requirement

Infrastructure health check 

  • belief this should also be 100%


RelEng/Infrastructure

Jessica Gonzalez

  • Tickets- Open showstoppers:
  • Tickets- Waiting on Community:
  • Migration Status / Upcoming Changes

Andrew Grimberg

  • Review of OOM Migration to  GitLab  
  • Namespace acquisition is WIP.

PTL Updates



Subcommittee Updates

Arch, Ctrl-Loop, Lab, Modeling, Seccom, Requirements



LFN Cross-Organization Updates

MAC, SPC, TAC, EUAG, LFN Board



TCC / ONAP Liaison Update



Task Force Update
CNF, Wiki 2.0, ONAP Enterprise


Next ONAP Enterprise meeting is scheduled on August 4th, 2021

  • SABRES (Secure, Adaptive, roBust, Resilient, and Efficient Slices) presented by Dr Eric Kline
  • Proposal of SABRES Integration into ONAP E2E Network Slicing call flows

TSC Activities and Deadlines

cl664y@att.com

  • Honolulu Awards
  • Action items from June LFN event identified during the daily summaries calls - Plenary: Daily Summaries 
  • TSC 2.0 - kenny is still, still making edits (sad) (sad) (sad)

Upcoming Events & Housekeeping

Kenny Paul

<Available Slot>



Action Items

  •  

Zoom Chat Log 


Zoom auto-transcript service - These are often translated incorrectly and can be misleading. They are NOT Authoritative!   Information as to why .
They are included here as a time stamp cross-reference for the recording only!  The notes above this line and the actual recordings are authoritative. 


  • No labels