Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Next »


2020 TSC Recordings

2020 TSC Decisions

Anti-Trust Policy

We will start our meetings by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.

Attendance 

AttendedProxy (w/ @name)Gov. HolidayDid Not Attend

Attendance is taken purely upon #info in Zoom Chat 

Alla.Goldner

AMDOCS

djhunt

IBM

Andreas Geißler proxy Marc Fiedler

DT

Lingli Deng

China Mobile

Bin Yang

WindRiver

Murat Turpçu 

Turk Telecom

cl664y@att.com proxy: ChrisC

AT&T

Former user (Deleted)

Reliance Jio

Ciaran Johnston

Ericsson

Olivier Phenix

Bell Canada

Davide Cherubini

Vodafone

Ranny Haiby 

Samsung

Dong Wang

China Telecom

Seshu Kumar Mudiganti

Huawei

Eric Debeau

Orange

Srinivasa Addepalli

Intel

Fernando Oliveira

Verizon

Timo Perala

Nokia

Time
(mins)

Agenda Items

Presented By

Presos/Notes/Links/

45

Release Status

David McBride


  • Honolulu
    • Schedule proposed
      • Please review and send feedback to David McBride .  Be prepared to vote on the schedule on Nov 19. 
    • TSC Initial Feedback on Requirements
      • Honolulu Release Requirements - 3 Use cases; 13 functional requirements (2 submitted post deadline) and 12 non functional requirements (1 submitted post-deadline)
      • M1 approval field was used to provide some feedback - only 4 functional requirements are candidate to be approved
      • Any new requirement submitted after Oct 16th, 2020 (Honolulu Deadline Submission) will be reviewed for the Istanbul release except Guilin requirement left-overs
      • Missing Honolulu Impact View per Component and a lot of information to understand the requirements, company commitments etc. - Please use the Requirement Template
      • Missing company commitments, specially for non functional requirement (30 mins PTL practice might not cover all the needs)
      • REQ-428 - Is it aligned with the Modeling Subcommittee?
      • Request to adopt a phasing approach for the Use Cases to avoid large number of components impacted within a release
      • Automated Test Cases are required for the Use Cases - have you factorized this as part of your company's engagement?
      • EUAG priorities? No new use case but continuity of former use cases i.e. 5G SON, Network Slicing, CCVPN, CNF
  • ACTIONS - No later than Nov 12th, 2020:
    • Subcommittees to follow up with the respective requirement owners and ensure that the remaining information is provided 
    • How does the TSC want to proceed with the first 4 approved requirements?
    • Guilin left-overs - start to meet Requirement Subcommittee for review

5

RelEng/Infrastructure

Jessica Gonzalez

  • Tickets- Open showstoppers:
  • Tickets- Waiting on Community:
  • Migration Status / Upcoming Changes

5

PTL Update



5

Subcommittee Update

Arch, Ctrl-Loop, Modeling, Seccom, Requirement



5

EUAG Update



5

TCC / ONAP Liaison Update



5

TAC Update



5

Task Force Update

CNF, Maintenance, ONAP Enterprise



10

TSC Activities and Deadlines

cl664y@att.com

Proposal to cancel the TSC meeting on Nov 26 due to the Thanksgiving holiday in the U.S.

5

Upcoming Events

Linux Foundation
  • LFN Developer & Testing Forum - Feb 1 - 4 (tentative)
    • Awaiting confirmation by the LFN TAC

Action Items

  •  

Zoom Chat Log 


  • No labels