...
Duration 90 minutes - https://zoom.us/j/661303200
@4pm CET/10am EST/7am PST/10pm China Time/7.30pm India Time
...
| Agenda Items | Presented By | Time | Notes/Links | JIRA Tasks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Dublin Release RC2 Follow-up Sign-Off? |
| 40 mins | Milestone Status
Release Details
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- xx out of 29 are completed
- xx out of 29 are in progress - blockers and/or documentation
|
JIRA Query - Remaining |
526 Items status != Closed AND status != Done AND project != "Sandbox Project" AND project != CI-Management AND project != "ONAP TSC" and fixVersion = "Dublin Release" ORDER BY key ASC, priority DESC, updated DESC | aaf/authz | ||
| Any Infrastructure Improvement/Plan | Linux Foundation | 5 mins | Global-jjb update - 11 of 29 projects complete!
Dockerhub migration - proposed start 2019-07-22
Contributor License Agreements (CLA)
Any LF showstopper |
Open
#76359: Need help with the info.Yaml changeCompleted #76345: Please help release Usecase-UI repos for Dublin Release #76359: Need help with the info.Yaml change | ||||
| PTL Update - Integration | 10 mins | In ODL, for instance, during release time-frame a few folks are granted “Supercommitter” rights, empowering them with merge rights on all repos. That way, when version number changes, or bug fix validated but no one to merge, etc., these set of people can take care of merging the needed patches and getting the release forward. Given our current structure in ONAP, where the integration team as to “vouch” for the state of ONAP before its release, it could make sense having Integration’s committer given such right. Suggestion: Integration Committers - 1 in APAC, 1 in EMEA & 1 in NAR to cover all the time-zones Scope: Code and Documentation Successful Story with OOM Alexis/Brian will prepare a detailed proposition to be reviewed by TSC | Carried forward from May 30 | |
| PTL Update - Portal | 5 mins |
Congratulations Lorraine Welch ! | |
| Subcommittee Update - CVC |
| 30 mins | Alignment to El Alto
|
| Carried forward from May 30 | ||||
| Frankfurt Release |
| 5 mins | Frankfurt Activity's plan proposal from M0 to M1 | Carried forward from May 30
|
| TSC Activities and Deadlines | Congratulations to Alla Goldner being elected as our ONAP Strategic Planning Committee (SPC) representative | |||
| Incoming ONAP Events | 5 mins |
Any remaining open question?
|
...
|
...
Zoom Chat Log Anchor zoom zoom
| zoom | |
| zoom |
06:52:06 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #topic rollcall
06:55:46 From Catherine Lefevre : #info, Catherine Lefevre, ONAP TSC
06:57:47 From Timo Perala (Nokia) : #info Timo Perala, Nokia
06:57:53 From Andreas Geissler (Deutsche Telekom) : #info Andreas Geissler (DT)
06:59:47 From Achilles De Villa : #info Achilles Devilla, Reliance Jio, proxy Ning So
06:59:57 From Eric Debeau : #info Eric Debeau, Orange
07:00:21 From Ciaran Johnston : #info Ciaran Johnston, Ericsson, proxy Stephen Terrill
07:00:41 From ALLAGO : #info Alla Goldner, Amdocs
07:00:46 From Adrian O'Sullivan : #info Adrian O’Sullivan, Huawei, proxy Chaker
07:01:04 From bin.yang@windriver.com : #info Bin Yang, Wind River
07:01:41 From Alexis de Talhouët : #info, Alexis de Talhouët, Bell Canada
07:02:43 From Viswa ( Verizon ) : #info Viswa, Verizon
07:03:31 From Jason Hunt : #info Jason Hunt, IBM
07:04:46 From Milind Jalwadi : #info Milind Jalwadi, TechMahindra
07:04:54 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #topic Dublin Release
07:05:13 From Yipan Deng (Intel) : #info proxy Yipan Deng, Intel Corp. (Proxy for Srinivasa Addepalli)
07:05:18 From Catherine Lefevre : Congrats MUSIC Team !
07:05:23 From Bharath Balasubramanian : Thanks!
07:05:59 From Davide Cherubini : #info Davide Cherubini, Vodafone
07:06:32 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : @Jim recommends RC2 is complete
07:07:22 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #AGREED The TSC approves RC2 as complete
07:08:36 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : - Sign off on the release not ready
07:09:35 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : - please remember to release a new image to integration after making a bug fix
07:10:18 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : -SECCOM still waiting on 6 project updates
07:10:57 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : -Integration blockers
07:12:28 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #ACTION @Yipan to follow up on OPTFRA-512 Due tomorrow
07:16:18 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : -Integration status
07:17:56 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : --vCPW w/ TOSCA @Yipan says that this should be moved to El Alto.
07:18:20 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #ACTION @Yipan to follow up on this tomorrow.
07:18:28 From Lingli : #info Lingli, CMCC
07:20:15 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : --5G PFN pre-onboarding
07:21:43 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : @Ben @Brian - do not believe this is a blocker
07:22:06 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #ACTION @Ben follow up due tomorrow
07:23:17 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : --Scaleout
07:24:44 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : --- @Yuiry believe it is working - testing still needed
07:26:05 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #ACTION @ScottB will report on status at PTL meeting
07:26:16 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : --CCVPN
07:28:01 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #ACTION @Seshu will follow up tomorrow
07:29:09 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : --BBS
07:31:50 From Eric Debeau : #info we tested end to end service deletion and it is working for vfw use-case
07:31:59 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : @David P-C phase 2 - E@E service termination can probably be pushed to El Alto
07:32:48 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : -difference may be the use of PNF resources
07:33:26 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #ACTION @David to follow up @ PTL meeting
07:35:16 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : --consistent ID cloud region
07:35:40 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #ACTION @Bin to follow up at PTL meeting
07:36:01 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : -SO-1995 needs to be added to the list.
07:37:32 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : --SOL004 package security
07:38:40 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #ACTION @Ciaran to follow up
07:39:22 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : --HPA vsec
07:39:37 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #ACTION @Yipan to follow upo
07:40:55 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : --Please cut your Dublin Branches!!!
07:43:53 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #topic Infrastructure / RelEng
07:44:23 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : --reminder global-jjb due July 19
07:45:10 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : --CLAs take effect July 1
07:45:33 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #topic supercommitters
07:46:17 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : -OOM supercommitter working well
07:48:53 From Keong : would supercommitters be elected?
07:51:58 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : -discussion of how to measure success,
07:52:25 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : -@Mike E says this has been extremely helpful.
07:54:01 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : -several suggestions of a trial
07:54:35 From Keong : can the teams be more geographically distributed for better timezone coverage?
07:55:02 From Eric Debeau : #info ok for the supercommitter proposal
07:58:20 From Keong : do supercommitters need to meet the normal committer criteria as well?
08:00:36 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #ACTION @Alexis and @Brian F to put together a formal proposal at next week's TSC meeting
08:02:26 From Manoop Talasila - AT&T : #TSC thanks for Lorraine’s approval
08:02:44 From Brian : who is zoom htip ? cant seem to reply to them
08:03:29 From Sai seshu : Sorry that's me Seshu... :)... Brian
08:03:55 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : #topic VNF Validation
08:04:05 From Sai seshu : It's the common zoom login that we use that pops up
08:04:17 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : @Lincoln reviewed the slides attached to the minutes
08:07:37 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : -discussion of alignment of the ONAP VVP program
08:08:13 From Steven Wright : ONAP VVP project is different - this is LFN OVP ...
08:09:01 From Viswa : Which program OVP or VVP provides the certification for ONAP-Compliant VNF ?
08:09:25 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : -VNFRQTS and VVP are feeders to the OVP
08:09:51 From Viswa : When a SP import a VSP in SDC, which program kicks in to verify the certification of VSP ?
08:10:40 From Kenny Paul (LFN) : -Technical communitys still define the criteria
08:13:14 From Steven Wright : If anyne has input in requirments for VNF certification, then please contribute to VNFRQTS
08:13:26 From Eric Debeau : #info Heather presented OVP during the last ONS
08:14:37 From Steven Wright : If you are interested to write tests for VNF packages - please contribute to VVP or VNFSDK as these will fold into the LFN OVP
08:14:45 From Adrian OSullivan a00252210 : agree with Catherine, I'd like to see how ONAP and other LFN projects fit in with OVP and CVC, what is the hierarchy
08:16:11 From Viswa : Same question in different way : If a vendor ask us where to go to get their VNFs ONAP-Certified, where should we guide them? VVP or OVP ?
08:17:35 From Eric Debeau : #info https://www.lfnetworking.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/55/2019/04/OPNFV_ONAP_OVP_Web_040319.pdf
08:17:57 From Steven Wright : @viswa, ONAP VVP provides tests for a VNF's HEAT template, but does not issue a certificate or logo. LFN OVP provides a process to otain a logo
08:20:34 From Viswa : @Steven Thanks. So answer to my question is OVP ?
08:21:49 From Brian : Linkage between OVP and ONAP needs to be improved since two things will happen 1) ONAP code will be used to test VNFs that operators care about and the OVP team doesnt really talk to integration team and 2) it really should be an ONAP validated VNF not an OVP validate VNF
08:27:43 From Eric Debeau : @Brian. THe link is there as OVP is based on VVP and VNFSDK tools.
08:29:12 From Brian : @Eric - ONAP team has been running the tests on VNFs so not clear how OVP team is working with the rest of ONAP since they will be moving into "instantiation" tests using an instance of ONAP somewhere as part of the next phase validation
08:31:52 From Eric Debeau : Today, OVP is only focusing on a MVP testing the VNF descriptor. I agree that for next phases, we need more relationships.
08:31:56 From Alexander Vul : The intent of ETSI NFV standards was to converge on a set of normative APIs, data formats, and packaging in order to optimize the automation story both from developer and operator perspective
08:33:03 From Alexander Vul : We now seem to be undoing this, by proliferating different packaging formats and different VNF descriptor encodings...
08:33:25 From Eric Debeau : The intent of ONAP is to converge on an open automation platform based
08:33:42 From Alexander Vul : @Eric - Orange is leading most of this standardization in ETSI
08:33:55 From Eric Debeau : ETSI/NFV has also defined 2 flavors with TOSCA and Yang.
08:34:12 From Alexander Vul : Sure… That was the beginning of the end…
08:34:51 From Alexander Vul : Now there are pending changes to support HEAT and K8S, and who knows what else down the line..
08:35:34 From Alexander Vul : So if ONAP is to ever be ETSI compliant we would potentially need to support a whole bunch of encoding formats, which will require SO to bloat…
08:36:11 From Eric Debeau : The reality is there...The cloud infra to host VNF are based on OPenStack and K8S.
08:36:38 From Alexander Vul : Today they are, rest assured that tomorrow they won’t be
08:37:25 From Eric Debeau : An alternative is to translate TOSCA based descriptors to HOT or Helm. To be discussed in DDF
08:37:43 From Alexander Vul : Or the inverse… which is easier
Zoom Attendance Log
| Anchor | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TSC Members Attendance based on Zoom Chat Log: xx%89%
| AMDOCS | 1 | Alla Goldner |
| AT&T | 1 | Catherine Lefevre |
| Bell Canada | 1 | Alexis de Talhouët |
| China Mobile | 1 | Lingli Deng |
| China Telecom | Yan Chen | |
| DT | 1 | Andreas Geissler |
| Ericsson | 1 | Ciaran Johnston, proxy for Stephen Terrill |
| Huawei | 1 | Adrian O'Sullivan, proxy for Chaker Al-Hakim |
| IBM | 1 | Jason Hunt |
| Intel | 1 | Ypan Deng, proxy for Srini Addepalli |
| Nokia | 1 | Timo Perala |
| Orange | 1 | Eric Debeau |
| Reliance Jio | 1 | Achilles de Villa, proxy for Ning So |
| Tech Mahindra | 1 | Milind Jalwadi |
| Turk Telecom | Murat Tupcu | |
| Verizon | 1 | Viswa Kumar Skand Priya |
| Vodafone | 1 | Davide Cherubini, proxy for Susana Sabater |
| WindRiver | 1 | Bin Yang |
...
TSC Decisions
...
Action Items:
- Yipan Deng to follow up on OPTFRA-512. Due
- Yipan Deng to follow up on vCPW w/ TOSCA. Due
- Benjamin Cheung to follow up on 5G PFN pre-onboarding. Due
- Scott Blandford to follow up on Scaleout / CDS at PTL meeting. Due
- Seshu Kumar Mudiganti to follow up on CCVPN. Due
- David Perez Caparros to follow up on BBS @ ptl meeting. Due
- Bin Yang to follow up on consistent ID cloud region at PTL meeting. Due
- Ciaran Johnston to follow up on SOL004. Due
- Yipan Deng to follow up on HPA sec. Due
- Alexis de Talhouët FREEMAN, BRIAN D to put together a formal proposal for supercommitters at next week's TSC meeting. Due
- Former user (Deleted) Rerun tool and discard readonly repos from branch list
- Former user (Deleted) to put forward an email waiver vote for MUSIC
- cl664y@att.com will compile the information on which companies block SSH to gerrit
- Collect feedback about Frankfurt Activity's plan proposal from M0 to M1 (TSC-129)
- Adolfo Perez-Duran meet with SECCOM on a recommended version and work with PTLs
- El Alto M3 checklist improvements for the security questions. Paweł Pawlak
- (SECCOM): Review Vulnerabilities that require significant rework, architecture change as "TSC MUST Have" candidates for El Alto
- Brian, Jess, Paul) to create a timeline considering our ONAP release roadmap including steps required for the multi-arch pipeline
...