Page Comparison

General Information:

• Date and Time: 2019, June 24th, 9pm~10pm Beijing Time, 9am~10am US Eastern
• Meeting Room: https://zoom.us/j/645982535
• Meeting Recording: zoom_0.mp4
• Meeting Chat Log: meeting_saved_chat.txt

Agenda:

• PNF software version proposal update
• AAI reverse engineering discussion

Material:

• ONAP R6+ Onboarding VNF/PNF package format, non-MANO artifacts set definition and PNF package mapping

Minutes:

• PNF software version proposal update
  • the detailed proposal has been updated on page ONAP R6+ Onboarding VNF/PNF package format, non-MANO artifacts set definition and PNF package mapping
    • options for file directories:
      • option 1: a single directory containing all ONAP non-MANO artifacts (i.e., files)
      • option 2: each category of ONAP non-MANO artifacts may have one dedicate directory
      • maybe option 2 is preferred
    • file name needs feedback
    • what would be like if a package including both MANO and non-MANO artifacts
      • example is available on 5G - PNF Pre-Onboarding & Onboarding
      • non-MANO artifacts have a tag in the manifest
        • should MANO artifacts also have a tag in the manifest? 
    • CSAR structure
      • currently only support option 1, not precluding option 2 in the future
    • security aspectes
      • VNFSDK has done some implementations, some are left for Frankfurt release, may need further check
  • ONAP hasn't fully established the registration process with ETSI (ETSI ask to provide more examples to show how to use the registry/artifacts)
    • Andrei/Michela are working on it
  • Andrei suggest to keep track of updates to the non-MANO artifacts
    • wiki pages are created per release now
  • Next step:
    • try to finalize the open questions this week
    • ask for a poll (if the proposal is ready) on next week's modeling subcommittee call
• AAI reverse engineering discussion
  • problems: AAI has a large data model, not sure which part are common to be put into IM
  • AAI data model visualization results:
    • PlantUML:
      • AAI OXM Schema UML
      • AAI EdgeRules UML
    • Papyrus:
      • Reverse-engineering AAI data model to Papyrus information model
  • Jacquiline's view: point to AAI's UML model, IM team working on part of the model which are considered as "common"( ? )
    • AAI can update their own model simultaneously
    • figure out the common model is not feasible
  • Keong: AAI's data model is designed to be shared, though which projects are using the model isn't documented well; track DMaaP events/AAI logs could be helpful
    • AAI Schema Producer-Consumer Pairings
  • Andy: analysis of APIs would be helpful
  • Questions:
    • could we make the assumption AAI provides a common model for the runtime?
      • seems yes
      • IM may help provide mappings between AAI model and standards
  • Keong and Jacquiline would help give presentations on the tools and results of AAI reverse engineering next week