Page Comparison

...

Test Planning for OOF Optimization Service Design Framework (OOF-OSDF)

The test structure here has been adapted from Policy Team's CSIT Functional Test Cases created by Pamela Dragosh

Anchor
Abbreviations for OOF OSDF Tests Abbreviations for OOF OSDF Tests

Abbreviations

...

Used

The following abbreviations are used in the functional test case description below since there

...

may be substantial repetition

...

along with clarification notes associated with some terms:

Anchor
OOF Beijing Release Functional Test Cases OOF Beijing Release Functional Test Cases

OOF-OSDF Beijing Release CSIT Functional Test Cases 

...

Id	Description	Pre-conditions	Test Steps	Expected Results
A: Health Checks

A.1:

for OOF-OSDF

Component Health Checks

Components and Dependencies (Policy and OOF-HAS API)

A.

1a

1

Perform

healthcheck

health check for the OOF-OSDF components using

Healthcheck

Health Check API   OSDF

(OF

Manager

)OSDF application component (OSDF application server) should be up and running

[OSDF Manager] EMULATORS-OR-SERVICES-ARE-UP Server and authentication details should

 

be configured at $OOF_HOME/config/feature-healthcheck.properties	SIMPLE-GET-HEALTH-CHECK-API	HTTP-200-TRUE
A.2

: OOF-OSDF Dependencies Health Checks

Test whether dependencies (external components) such as Policy, and other OOF components (e.g. HAS API) respond to health checks.

A.2aPerform healthcheck

CHECK-REQ-OR-OPTIONAL Perform health check for the following external components and OOF components using

Healthcheck

Health Check API: Policy (external component) OOF-HAS API

Service configuration file(s) should be available and loaded.

Services should be up and running.

(OOF component)	[Policy Emulator] [OOF-HAS API – container or emulator] EMULATORS-OR-SERVICES-ARE-UP	SIMPLE-GET-HEALTH-CHECK-API	HTTP-200-TRUE NOTE: Per comment and discussion with Ramki, removing this cell TODO: Retain this cell till 19 Feb 2018 and then remove it.
B:

Tests Related to

Fetch Data from Emulators (valid and invalid data

sets

, via GET and POST)

B.1

: Check Requests covering Valid and Invalid Data

Testing whether dependencies (mostly external components such as Policy, A&AI, Multi Cloud, etc., and in some cases other OOF containers) are available and return expected data. The external components will be mock emulators, while internal components may be mock or real.

2

Retrieve data from mock emulators for the following components or links via emulators:

• OSDF → HAS (POST template)
• OSDF → HAS (GET status/solution)
• OSDF → Policy
• HAS → Multi Cloud
• HAS → A&AI (clarify)
• HAS → DMaaP (clarify)
  
• HAS → MUSIC
• Interactions among HAS internal components (when using separate Docker containers)

Emulator configuration file should be available and loaded.

Emulator services should be up and running.

For some internal component testing, emulators may be replaced by real systems when convenient

API – specific to each component

Method - POST in most cases; GET in some cases

Endpoint: http://<host>:<port>/<specific-API>

Notes:

1. Split these into individual cells and expand

Should receive expected data

TODO: Expand individual cases as separate cells within this section

C: Tests Related to Data from Emulators (valid and invalid data sets)

B.2:

B.1: Checking Dependencies (Mostly external components) via Emulators

Testing whether dependencies (mostly external components such as Policy, A&AI, Multi Cloud, etc., and in some cases other OOF containers) are available and return expected data. The external components will be mock emulators, while internal components may be mock or real.

	Retrieve response corresponding to "valid request" from HAS-API emulator OSDF → HAS (POST data)	[OOF-HAS API – container or emulator]EMULATORS-OR-SERVICES-ARE-UP	SIMPLE-GET-POST-TO-EMULATORS-OR-SERVICES TODO: Payload for OSDF-HAS request (based on SO-OOF/HAS Request Example below in section on payloads; dr_patel_an to add the payload; Shankaranarayanan Puzhavakath Narayanan to review) TODO: Endpoint and ports	Should receive a "request accepted" type response, following which we query status and the status should be a valid one (translating, translated, solving, solved, solution not found, etc.)
B.2	Retrieve response corresponding to "valid policy query" from Policy emulator OSDF → Policy (POST query data)	[Policy] EMULATORS-OR-SERVICES-ARE-UP	SIMPLE-GET-POST-TO-EMULATORS-OR-SERVICES TODO: Payloads and Endpoint	Should receive response for valid policy query TODO: Payloads
B.3	CHECK-REQ-OR-OPTIONAL OSDF → Policy (bad result) OSDF → HAS (GET; bad status) Moved to another cell OSDF → HAS (GET; solution found)	[Policy Emulator] [OOF-HAS API – container or emulator] EMULATORS-OR-SERVICES-ARE-UP	SIMPLE-GET-POST-TO-EMULATORS-OR-SERVICES TODO: Payloads and Endpoint	Should receive corresponding responses TODO: Payloads NOTE: Per comment and discussion with Ramki, removed tests for "malformed" requests (open to adding them later on as needed). Moved the remaining one to a separate cell. TODO: Retain this cell till 19 Feb 2018 and then remove it.
B.4	Retrieve response corresponding to a decision from Conductor (i.e. "done" with either a solution found or no solution found): OSDF → HAS (GET; solution found OR no solution found). Since we cannot guarantee whether a solution can be found (it is dependendent on dynamic state of the cloud instance), it may be better to merge it to a "solution found OR no solution found" – i.e. Conductor is done processing and gave a decision	[Policy Emulator] [OOF-HAS API – container or emulator] EMULATORS-OR-SERVICES-ARE-UP	SIMPLE-GET-POST-TO-EMULATORS-OR-SERVICES TODO: Payloads and Endpoint	TODO: Check format of response and valid status messages
C: Run Complete Requests for Different Applications
C.1	SO → OSDF → HAS (well formatted request)	[Policy Emulator] [OOF-HAS API – container or emulator] EMULATORS-OR-SERVICES-ARE-UP	SIMPLE-GET-POST-TO-EMULATORS-OR-SERVICES TODO: Payloads, Endpoint, and Call-Back URL	Should receive a valid Conductor reponse TODO: Payloads
C.2	CHECK-REQ-OR-OPTIONAL SO → OSDF → HAS (mal-formatted request or a data error so that the request goes through OSDF but fails at Conductor)	[Policy Emulator] [OOF-HAS API – container or emulator] EMULATORS-OR-SERVICES-ARE-UP	SIMPLE-GET-POST-TO-EMULATORS-OR-SERVICES TODO: Payloads, Endpoint, and Call-Back URL	Should receive a RequestError or an error from Conductor TODO: Payloads NOTE: Per comment and discussion with Ramki, removing this cell TODO: Retain this cell till 19 Feb 2018 and then remove it.
C.3	SO → OSDF → HAS → OSDF → Call Back URL A valid request sent from SO to OSDF, which results in a valid template sent from OSDF to HAS. OSDF will then poll HAS till a decision is made (i.e. "done" with either a solution found or no solution found; it is probably difficult to ensure a solution is guaranteed – it is great if a solution is found, and it is OK for testing purposes even if there if no solution in some cases)	[Policy Emulator] [OOF-HAS API – container or emulator] [SO-OOF-OSDF call-back receiver] EMULATORS-OR-SERVICES-ARE-UP	[Policy Emulator] [OOF-HAS API – container or emulator] EMULATORS-OR-SERVICES-ARE-UP	Should receive a "done" type Conductor reponse (either successful in finding a solution or failed to find a solution, but Conductor made a decision either way) TODO: Payloads

Example Request/Response Payloads for OOF-OSDF Functional Test Cases

{
  "requestInfo": {
    "transactionId": "xxx-xxx-xxxx",
    "requestId": "yyy-yyy-yyyy",
    "callbackUrl": "https://so:5000/callbackUrl",
    "sourceId": "SO",
    "requestType": "create",
    "numSolutions": 1,
    "optimizers": ["placement"],
    "timeout": 600
  },
  "requestParameters": { "customerLatitude": 32.89748, "customerLongitude": -97.040443, "customerName": "xyz" },
  "placementDemands": [
    {
      "resourceModuleName": "vGMuxInfra",
      "serviceResourceId": "vGMuxInfra-xx",
      "tenantId": "vGMuxInfra-tenant",
      "resourceModelInfo": {
        "modelInvariantId": "vGMuxInfra-modelInvariantId",
        "modelVersionId": "vGMuxInfra-versionId",
        "modelName": "vGMuxInfra-model",
        "modelType": "resource",
        "modelVersion": "1.0",
        "modelCustomizationName": "vGMuxInfra-customeModelName"
      },
      "existingCandidates": { "identifierType": "service_instance_id", "identifiers": ["87257b49-9602-4ca1-9817-094e52bc873b"] },
      "excludedCandidates": { "identifierType": "service_instance_id", "identifiers": ["1ac71fb8-ad43-4e16-9459-c3f372b8236d"] },
      "requiredCandidates": { "identifierType": "service_instance_id", "identifiers": ["7e6c3e57-62cd-44f6-aa88-d0896998f7ec"] }
    },
    {
      "resourceModuleName": "vG",
      "serviceResourceId": "71d563e8-e714-4393-8f99-cc480144a05e",
      "tenantId": "vG-tenant",
      "resourceModelInfo": {
        "modelInvariantId": "vG-modelInvariantId",
        "modelVersionId": "vG-versionId",
        "modelName": "vG-model",
        "modelType": "resource",
        "modelVersion": "1.0",
        "modelCustomizationName": "vG-customeModelName"
      },
      "existingCandidates": { "identifierType": "service_instance_id", "identifiers": ["21d5f3e8-e714-4383-8f99-cc480144505a"] },
      "excludedCandidates": { "identifierType": "service_instance_id", "identifiers": ["1ac71fb8-ad43-4e16-9459-c3f372b8236d"] },
      "requiredCandidates": { "identifierType": "cloud_region_id", "identifiers": ["TXAUS219"] }
    }
  ],
  "serviceInfo": {
    "serviceInstanceId": "d61b2543-5914-4b8f-8e81-81e38575b8ec",
    "serviceModelInfo": {
      "modelInvariantId": "vCPE-invariantId",
      "modelVersionId": "vCPE-versionId",
      "modelName": "vCPE-model",
      "modelType": "service",
      "modelVersion": "1.0",
      "modelCustomizationName": "vCPE-customeModelName"
    }
  },
  "licenseDemands": [
    {
      "resourceModuleName": "vGMuxInfra",
      "serviceResourceId": "vGMuxInfra-xx",
      "tenantId": "vGMuxInfra-tenant",
      "resourceModelInfo": {
        "modelInvariantId": "vGMuxInfra-modelInvariantId",
        "modelVersionId": "vGMuxInfra-versionId",
        "modelName": "vGMuxInfra-model",
        "modelType": "resource",
        "modelVersion": "1.0",
        "modelCustomizationName": "vGMuxInfra-customeModelName"
      },
      "existingLicenses": {
        "entitlementPoolUUID": ["87257b49-9602-4ca1-9817-094e52bc873b", "43257b49-9602-4fe5-9337-094e52bc9435"],
        "licenseKeyGroupUUID": ["87257b49-9602-4ca1-9817-094e52bc873b", "43257b49-9602-4fe5-9337-094e52bc9435"]
      }
    }
  ]
}

{
  "transactionId": "xxx-xxx-xxxx",
  "requestId": "yyy-yyy-yyyy",
  "requestState": "completed",
  "statusMessage": "Success!",
  "solutions": {
    "placementSolutions": [
      {
        "resourceModuleName": "vGMuxInfra",
        "serviceResourceId": "some_resource_id",
        "identifierType": "service_instance_id",
        "identifier": "1ac71fb8-ad43-4e16-9459-c3f372b8236d",
        "assignmentInfo": [
          { "key": "cloudOwner", "value": "amazon" },
          { "key": "vnfHostName", "value": "ahr344gh" },
          { "key": "isRehome", "value": "False" },
          { "key": "cloud_region_id", "value": "1ac71fb8-ad43-4e16-9459-c3f372b8236d" }
        ]
      },
      {
        "resourceModuleName": "vG",
        "serviceResourceId": "some_resource_id",
        "identifierType": "cloud_region_id",
        "identifier": "2ac71fb8-ad43-4e16-9459-c3f372b8236d",
        "assignmentInfo": [
          { "key": "cloudOwner", "value": "amazon" },
          { "key": "cloud_region_id", "value": "1ac71fb8-ad43-4e16-9459-c3f372b8236d" }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "licenseSolutions": [
      {
        "resourceModuleName": "vGMuxInfra",
        "serviceResourceId": "some_resource_id",
        "entitlementPoolUUID": ["1ac71fb8-ad43-4e16-9459-c3f372b8236d", "834fc71fb8-ad43-4fh7-9459-c3f372b8236f"],
        "licenseKeyGroupUUID": ["1ac71fb8-ad43-4e16-9459-c3f372b8236d", "834fc71fb8-ad43-4fh7-9459-c3f372b8236f"],
        "entitlementPoolInvariantUUID": ["1ac71fb8-ad43-4e16-9459-c3f372b8236d", "834fc71fb8-ad43-4fh7-9459-c3f372b8236f"],
        "licenseKeyGroupInvariantUUID": ["1ac71fb8-ad43-4e16-9459-c3f372b8236d", "834fc71fb8-ad43-4fh7-9459-c3f372b8236f"]
      }
    ]
  }
}

Test Planning for OOF Homing and Allocation Service (OOF-HAS)

All Functional Test Cases described here below will be automatized in the CSIT ONAP integration environment. OOF-HAS is a data driven component, this means that test cases and related results have dependency on A&AI network database content. For this reason OOF-HAS Functional Test cases divided in 2 groups according to OOF-HAS functionality definition status and dependency from A&AI: Test cases marked in Green are those that will be delivered as first set of Functional Test cases as they have limited dependencies on A&AI data set, those marked in white will be scoped by ONAP Beijing delivery final test steps where all components have better stability in the scope of Beijing release.

Note: for the moment we consider the whole OOF component as the contribution of 2 Docker Containers:

-       OSDF : handling “R” interface, which is invoked by SO

-       OOF-HAS: handling the internal “R’” interface, which in invoked by OSDF

Appendix A: Overview of ONAP Testing Requirements

TODO

Appendix B: Overview of OOF Scope

TODO

Overview of OOF-OSDF Scope

General Description

The OOF-OSDF is meant to provide an environment for creating policy-driven optimization applications in a declarative manner easily. It also provides an execution environment for these models to be interpreted and run. Additionally, it supports external, custom optimizers such as the HAS application by providing various levels of functionality to the optimization applications. For example, the OSDF may fetch and translate policies for HAS, or it may fetch policies and data for another application.

Technical Description for OOF-OSDF Functionality related to OOF-HAS

The OOF-OSDF is provides the following functionality to support OOF-HAS:

1. Provide an end point for SO to make homing requests
2. Ensure authentication and validate the incoming request payload based on a model (Python Schematics model based on the SO-OOF API)
3. Fetch policies relevant to the SO's request (e.g. based on specific use case such as vCPE) and ensure that the policies are valid (well formed and contain required attributes)
4. Send response to SO that the request is accepted and is in processing (or send an error response)
5. Create a "template" (request payload) for OOF-HAS and submit the request to OOF-HAS
6. Periodically poll OOF-HAS for request processing status and optimization solution (with a configurable timeout) and validate the response based on a model (Python Schematics model)
7. Post the optimization solution to the call-back URL specified in the request from SO in the format defined by SO-OOF API (or send an error response)

Overview of OOF-HAS Scope

General Description

TODO

Technical Description for OOF-HAS Functionality 

TODO

Appendix C: Resources and Links

1. Notes on creating a CSIT test script: https://wikilf-onap.onapatlassian.orgnet/wiki/display/DW/Creating+a+CSIT+Test

2. Policy Team's CSIT Functional Test Cases by Pamela Dragosh. The OOF-OSDF test cases are adapted from that page.

3. Slides on Platform Maturity Requirements for Beijing Release: https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/16002054/Platform%20Maturity%20Level%20proposal%2013Dec2017v2.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1513625784000&api=v2
4. Current Individual Project Commitment for supporting Platform Maturity Requirements for Beijing Release: 

   https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/wiki/display/DW/Beijing+Release+Platform+Maturity

5. ONAP 4 level CI/CD architecture: Integration (5/11/2017)