Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: test plan updates


Table of Contents

Overview

Project NameEnter the name of the project
Target Release NameHonolulu 
Project Lifecycle StateMature. Refer to ONAP Charter, section 3.3 Project Lifecycle for further information
Participating Company AT&T, Nokia, Ericsson, Wipro,  ChinaMobile,  T-Mobile

Scope

What is this release trying to address?

...

TBCTBC
REQ#DCAE Commit StatusDCAE Impact AssessmentDCAE JIRA #
REQ-422 - Bulk PM / PM Data Control ImprovementsYES

PMSH enhancement for dynamic filter/subscription change


Commitment from Ericsson

DCAEGEN2-2541 
NA (Backlog)YES

MOD updates 
- New Enhance MOD UI/catalog and deployment (POC)


Commitment from AT&T

DCAEGEN2-2313


NA (Backlog)YES

Generic mechanism to attach K8S ConfigMaps to DCAE apps. through spec/bp-gen/plugin  (VES and DFC)


Commitment from Nokia

DCAEGEN2-2539

NA (Backlog)YES

BP-gen Enhancements

  • Fix issues/bug noted in Guilin testing
  • Adjust BP-gen to support native Kafka topics
  • Adjust BP-gen to support DFC component spec

Commitment from Nokia

DCAEGEN2-2458

NA (Backlog)TBCStretch

VESCollector Enhancements – Event publish order issue 


Commitment from Nokia

DCAEGEN2-1483

NA (Backlog)?Stretch 

Plugin path/load optimization: Taking release from PATH on raw/plugin repo location (rely on version) and update bootstrap/cloudify build


DCAEGEN2-2337

NA (Backlog)?Stretch Eliminate use of Consul service discovery in DCAEDCAEGEN2-1786NA

Honolulu POC (

...

DCAE impact)

...

DCAEGEN2-2230

Honolulu POC (DCAE impact)

DCAE Commit TBC 
REQ#REQ#DCAE Commit StatusDCAE Impact AssessmentDCAE JIRA #
REQ-479 - DCAE Transformation to support HelmYES
  • Bootstrap component migration
  • Platform sidecar (policy)
  • Configuration management (Design)
  • MOD helm onboarding (Design)

Commitment from AT&T, Independent Contributors

DCAEGEN2-2488

REQ-478 - PoC - TOSCA Defined Control Loop on Honolulu ReleaseNOTBANeed more info
REQ-470 - DCAE extension for collecting files from HTTP serversYES

DFC Enhancement 

Commitment from Nokia

DCAEGEN2-2517 

...

TBC (based on resource)
REQ#DCAE Commit StatusDCAE Impact AssesmentDCAE JIRA #
REQ-443 - CONTINUATION OF CII BADGING SCORE IMPROVEMENTS FOR SILVER LEVEL TBCStretchTBA
DCAEGEN2-2570
REQ-441 - LOGS MANAGEMENT - PHASE 1: COMMON PLACE FOR DATANOTBANeed more info
REQ-439 - CONTINUATION OF PACKAGES UPGRADES IN DIRECT DEPENDENCIESYES

Tcagen2, DFC, RESTConf, VES, InventoryAPI, MOD-runtimeAPI, Mapper, PM-Mapper, PRH, SON-Handler


DCAEGEN2-2551
REQ-432 - IPv4/IPv6 dual stack support in ONAP (Honolulu)YES

 CFY Plugin to support IPv6 service exposure + VES Spec updates 


Commitment from Nokia

DCAEGEN2-2477





Global Requirements

REQ#DCAE Commit StatusDCAE Impact AssesmentDCAE JIRA #
REQ-438 - COMPLETION OF JAVA LANGUAGE UPDATE (v8 → v11)
TBC (based on upstream depenency)MOD/genprocessor 
YES

Require exception for MOD/genprocessor/designtool/nifi-registry

Risk #6 (Honolulu Risks)

DCAEGEN2-2381

DCAEGEN2-2428

REQ-437 - COMPLETION OF PYTHON LANGUAGE UPDATE (v2.7 → v3.8
TBC (based on resource)
YES


  • Cloudify upgrade to 5.1 community version 


Commitment from T-mobile, Independent contributon 


Risk #7 (Honolulu Risks)

DCAEGEN2-2494

DCAEGEN2-2427


DCAEGEN2-1546

Note: The above commitment is consistent with Honolulu Impact View per Component (as of 1/19/2021) 

New Services introduced for this release 

...

 Platform Maturity (i.e., S3P items)  Guilin   Honolulu Release Platform Maturity


 Green color → Target level ( details see Platform Maturity below)

      • Performance:  Level 1
      • Stability: Level 2
      • Resiliency: Level 2
      • Security: Level 1+
      • Scalability: Level 1
      • Manageability: Level 1+
      • Usability: Level 1+             

...

In addition to existing platform/service component, following new components are targeted for Honolulu.

AreaActual LevelTargeted Level for current ReleaseHow, EvidencesCommentsPerformance11
    • Level 0: no performance testing done
    • Level 1: baseline performance criteria identified and measured  (such as response time, transaction/message rate, latency, footprint, etc. to be defined on per component)
    • Level 2: performance improvement plan created 
    • Level 3: performance improvement plan implemented for 1 release (improvement measured for equivalent functionality & equivalent hardware)
Stability2

2

    • Level 0: none beyond release requirements
    • Level 1: 72 hour component-level soak test (random test transactions with 80% code coverage; steady load)
    • Level 2: 72 hour platform-level soak test (random test transactions with 80% code coverage; steady load)
    • Level 3: track record over 6 months of reduced defect rate
Resiliency22
    • 0 – none
    • 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)
    • 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)
    • 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)
Security1

1+  (Most DCAE components are complaint; will address remaining in Honolulu based on resource availability)

    • Level 0: None
    • Level 1: CII Passing badge
      • Including no critical and high known vulnerabilities > 60 days old
    • Level 2: CII Silver badge, plus:
      • All internal/external system communications shall be able to be encrypted.
      • All internal/external service calls shall have common role-based access control and authorization using CADI framework.
    • Level 3: CII Gold badge 
Scalability1

1

    • Level 0: no ability to scale
    • Level 1: supports single site horizontal scale out and scale in, independent of other components
    • Level 2: supports geographic scaling, independent of other components
    • Level 3: support scaling (interoperability) across multiple ONAP instances
Manageability1

1+  (Except logging, all other requirements are met)

  • Level 1:
  • All ONAP components will use a single logging
    DeliverableRepository Maven Group ID

    Components Description

    ONAP Dependencies

    List the other ONAP projects you depend on.

    DCAE depends on the the following components as part of the general ONAP architecture:

    • AAI: DCAE MS retrieves and updates VNF data from/to AAI
    • DMaaP: Message bus for communication with other components in the solution
    • Policy - For managing application configuration policy
    • CLAMP - For CL flow related MS instantiation and configuration
    • OOF - For SON handler support

    Architecture

    High level architecture diagram

    At that stage within the Release, the team is expected to provide more Architecture details describing how the functional modules are interacting.

    Indicate where your project fit within the Amsterdam architecture diagram_1.0.0.pptx.

    Block and sequence diagrams showing relation within the project as well as relation with external components are expected.

    Anyone reading this section should have a good understanding of all the interacting modules.

    Image Removed

     

    Platform Maturity

    Refering to 2017-06-28 CII badging for ONAP.pptx and Platform Maturity Requirements (aka Carrier Grade), fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.

    Components Description

    KPI Computation MS 

    https://git.onap.org/dcaegen2/services/tree/components/kpi-computation-ms (introduced as new subproject under existing repo)

    REQ-440 

    VES-OpenAPI-Manager

    https://gerrit.onap.org/r/admin/repos/dcaegen2/platform/ves-openapi-manager  (New repo)

    REQ-433

    DCAE-service-policy-Sync 

    https://git.onap.org/dcaegen2/deployments/tree/dcae-services-policy-sync  (introduced a new subproject/module under existing repo)

    REQ-479

    ONAP Dependencies

    List the other ONAP projects you depend on.


    DCAE depends on the the following components as part of the general ONAP architecture:

    • AAI: DCAE MS retrieves and updates VNF data from/to AAI
    • DMaaP: Message bus for communication with other components in the solution
    • Policy - For managing application configuration policy
    • CLAMP - For CL flow related MS instantiation and configuration
    • OOF - For SON handler support

    Architecture

    High level architecture diagram

    At that stage within the Release, the team is expected to provide more Architecture details describing how the functional modules are interacting.

    Indicate where your project fit within the Amsterdam architecture diagram_1.0.0.pptx.

    Block and sequence diagrams showing relation within the project as well as relation with external components are expected.

    Anyone reading this section should have a good understanding of all the interacting modules.



    Image Added


     

    Target Architecture (REQ-479)


    Image Added

    Platform Maturity

    Refering to 2017-06-28 CII badging for ONAP.pptx and Platform Maturity Requirements (aka Carrier Grade), fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.

    AreaActual LevelTargeted Level for current ReleaseHow, EvidencesComments
    Performance11
      • Level 0: no performance testing done
      • Level 1: baseline performance criteria identified and measured  (such as response time, transaction/message rate, latency, footprint, etc. to be defined on per component)
      • Level 2: performance improvement plan created 
      • Level 3: performance improvement plan implemented for 1 release (improvement measured for equivalent functionality & equivalent hardware)
    Stability2

    2




      • Level 0: none beyond release requirements
      • Level 1: 72 hour component-level soak test (random test transactions with 80% code coverage; steady load)
      • Level 2: 72 hour platform-level soak test (random test transactions with 80% code coverage; steady load)
      • Level 3: track record over 6 months of reduced defect rate
    Resiliency22
      • 0 – none
      • 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)
      • 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)
      • 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)
    Security1

    1+  (Most DCAE components are complaint; will address remaining in Honolulu based on resource availability)



      • Level 0: None
      • Level 1: CII Passing badge
        • Including no critical and high known vulnerabilities > 60 days old
      • Level 2: CII Silver badge, plus:
        • All internal/external system communications shall be able to be encrypted.
        • All internal/external service calls shall have common role-based access control and authorization using CADI framework.
      • Level 3: CII Gold badge 
    Scalability1

    1



      • Level 0: no ability to scale
      • Level 1: supports single site horizontal scale out and scale in, independent of other components
      • Level 2: supports geographic scaling, independent of other components
      • Level 3: support scaling (interoperability) across multiple ONAP instances
    Manageability1

    1+  (Except logging, all other requirements are met)



      • Level 1:
      • All ONAP components will use a single logging system.
      • Instantiation of a simple ONAP system should be accomplished in <1 hour with a minimal footprint
      • Level 2:
        • A component can be independently upgraded without impacting operation interacting components
        • Component configuration to be externalized in a common fashion across ONAP projects
        • All application logging to adhere to ONAP Application Logging Specification v1.2
        • Implement guidelines for a minimal container footprint
      • Level 3
        • Transaction tracing across components
    Usability1

    1+



      • Level 1:
        • User guide created
        • Deployment documentation
        • API documentation
        • Adherence to coding guidelines
      • Level 2:
      • Level 3
        • Consistent UI across ONAP projects
        • Usability testing conducted
        • API Documentation
      • Level 4

    ...

    List the API this project is expecting from other projects. Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.

    Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.

    API NameAPI DescriptionAPI Definition DateAPI Delivery dateAPI Definition link (i.e.swagger)
    SDC model distribution APIAPI for retrieving TOSCA model of close loopCurrently AvailableTo fill outCurrently AvailableLink toward the detailed API description
    Policy EngineAPI for retrieving configuration policy updatesCurrently AvailableCurrently AvailableNA
    Policy (PDP) API to push DCAE MS configuration/policy modelsCurrently AvailableCurrently Available
    A&AIAPI invoked for information enhancementsCurrently AvailableCurrently Available
    DMaaP Message RouterAPI for topic publish / subscribeCurrently AvailableCurrently Available
    DMaaP Bus ControllerDMaaP Bus Controller is a part of DMaaP that provides topic provisioning; this is the API for topic provisioning.Currently AvailableCurrently Available
     OOF

     PCI Optimization API http://{OOF-host}:{port}/api/oof/v1/pci

     http://{pcims-host}:{port}/callbackUrl Call back URL for SON-MS (to provide PCI optimization results)

     Currently Available Currently Available
     ConfigDB

    http://{ConfigDB-host/IP}:{port}/SDNCConfigDBAPI/getNbrList/{cellId}/{ts} (Get neighbor list for  a cell Id)

    http://{ConfigDB-host/IP}:{port}/SDNCConfigDBAPI/getPnfName/{cellId}/{ts} (Get the PNF name for a cell Id)
     Currently AvailableCurrently Available
    • API Outgoing Dependencies

    ...


    CPSUsed by SON-handler and/or Slice-Analysis MSM2R8 M2
    • API Outgoing Dependencies

    API this project is delivering to other projects.

    ...

    • Testing and Integration Plans

        • Unit Test addition will be enforced part of new code submission; all components are required to maintain 55% codecoverage at the minumum. 
        • Functional test plan
        • CSIT tests will continue to be supported for existing componentsPairwise testing will be components and new components
        • Pairwise testing will be done in the WindRiver Dev lab similar to what was done in last release
    • Gaps

    ...

    • Gaps

    This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release. List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.

    ...

    Jira Legacy
    serverSystem Jira
    columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
    maximumIssues20
    jqlQueryproject=dcaegen2 and issuetype in (bug) and fixversion='Honolulu Release' and status != 'Closed'
    serverId4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176

    • Risks

    List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).

    ...

    Cloudify support for Python 3.x not available currently, expected in by Aug 2020 timeframe. This impacts migration of Cloudify and associated plugins in Honolulu (REQ-373)

    ...

    • Resources

    ...

    '
    serverId4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176

    • Risks

    List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).

    Risk identifiedMitigation PlanContingency Plan

    With Cloudify 3.x support releated by Cloudify under 5.1.1, DCAE CM pod upgrade is targetted for H release. This will be major upgrade requiring extensive regression. For any issues identified - may need to coordinate with Cloudify which could span beyond H release timeframe

    Based on severity of issue - we'll assess if new continairs can be released for H release or if need to be withheld.None
    Due to upstream dependency on NIFI project, some of MOD (NiFI) components (designtool/gen-processor/nifi-registry) will remain in java 8Continue Guilin version

    DCAEGEN2-2428

    • Resources

    Please see the INFO.yaml files associated with each repo as the authoritative sources of information. https://gerrit.onap.org/r/admin/repos/q/filter:dcae


    • Release Milestone

    The milestones are defined at the Release Planning (legacy): Honolulu and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.

    ...