(Presumably this will move under Beijing)WIP: DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR COMMENTS
The content of this template is expected to be fill out for M1 Release Planning Milestone.
follow
Platform Maturity Requirements (aka Carrier Grade)
fill Beijing Release Platform Maturity
| Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
Use the "Copy" and "Move" options (available under the ..., top right of this page) to duplicate this template into your project wiki. |
| Table of Contents | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Overview
| Project Name | Enter the name of the project |
|---|---|
| Target Release Name | Beijing |
| Project Lifecycle State | Incubation |
| Participating Company | Amdocs, AT&T, Bell |
Scope
What is this release trying to address?
Provide an ELK implementation for ONAP as described on https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/debug-application-cluster/logging-elasticsearch-kibana/
| Jira Legacy | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Jira Legacy | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Use Cases
Use Case: Residential Broadband vCPE (Approved)
Minimum Viable Product
The MVP for Amsterdam will:
- Logging RI as a demo/reference for teams not currently running filebeat containers in their pods
Currently the following are using filebeat already (aai, appc, so, policy, portal, sdc, sdnc, vid) - Logging AOP based library for use by all component teams as a spring shared jar.
- Emit standardized, machine-readable logging output, correlated by transaction ID.
- Allow dynamic reconfiguration of logging providers.
- Provide a reference configuration for Elastic Stack, automatically deployed by Kubernetes and the ONAP Operations Manager.
- Provide reference configurations for shipping and indexing of ONAP logs to the ELK stack via filebeat.
- Provide standard Kibana dashboards for transaction traceability and general lucene spec log searches
- Logging RI as a demo/reference for teams not currently running filebeat containers in their pods
Functionalities
Epics
| Jira Legacy | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Stories
| Jira Legacy | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Longer term roadmap
Release Deliverables
Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.
Deliverable Name | Deliverable Description |
|---|---|
| Revised logging guidelines | Updates to What's New - ONAP Application Logging Guidelines reflecting new conventions and requirements. |
| Logging provider configuration defaults | Regularized configuration locations, simplifying deployment and customization. |
| Logging provider output defaults | Regularized output locations, simplifying deployment and customization, and the shipping and indexing of logs. |
| Logging provider migration | Optional standardization of logger providers, including upgrading from EOL Log4j 1.X. |
| Updated logging provider configuration(s) | Updated, standardized configurations for all logging providers and ONAP components - specific to OOM in the OOM repo. |
| Filebeat configuration | Reference configuration for Elastic Stack Filebeat shipping. |
| Logstash configuration | Reference configuration for Elastic Stack Logstash indexing. |
| Elasticsearch configuration | Reference configuration for Elastic Stack Elasticsearch. |
| Kibana configuration | Reference configuration for Elastic Stack's Kibana Discover UI. |
| Elastic Stack deployment | Automated OOM deployment of an Elastic Stack reference configuration, providing ONAP with an OOTB analytics platform. |
| Documentation | Other documentation supporting analytics configuration. |
Sub-Components
none
Architecture
High level architecture diagram
Filebeat agent microservice per component feeds logs via emptyDir persistent volumes from each component docker container to the ELK stack pod via the logstash container. These high level ELK paths are overlayed on a the reference vFirewall L4 use case of ONAP.
We fit in the overall architecture of ONAP as an OOM Kubernetes pod of 3 containers (ELK) and a per/microservice logstash container above - and below
Logging Architecture#OOMDeployment
Platform Maturity
Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.
| Area | Actual Level | Targeted Level for current Release | How, Evidences | Comments | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 0 | 0 |
| |||||||||
| Stability | 1 | 1 | OOM system up on cd.onap.info for > 72 hours at ~10 tx/sec
|
| ||||||||
| Resiliency | 2 (**) | 2 (**) |
| |||||||||
| Security | 0 | 0 |
| |||||||||
| Scalability | 1 | 1 |
| |||||||||
| Manageability | 1 | 1 |
| |||||||||
| Usability | 0 | 1 |
|
** Standard OOB OOM Kubernetes resilience/stability
API Incoming Dependencies
List the API this project is expecting from other projects.
Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.
Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.
| API Name | API Description | API Definition Date | API Delivery date | API Definition link (i.e.swagger) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| To fill out | High level description of the API | Date for which the API is reviewed and agreed | To fill out | Link toward the detailed API description |
API Outgoing Dependencies
API this project is delivering to other projects.
| API Name | API Description | API Definition Date | API Delivery date | API Definition link (i.e.swagger) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EELF | AT&T EELF | 20170201 | Beijing Relase |
Third Party Products Dependencies
Third Party Products mean products that are mandatory to provide services for your components. Development of new functionality in third party product may or not be expected.
List the Third Party Products (OpenStack, ODL, RabbitMQ, ElasticSearch,Crystal Reports, ...).
| Name | Description | Version |
|---|---|---|
| JAX-RS | Java API for Restfull Service | 2.0 |
In case there are specific dependencies (Centos 7 vs Ubuntu 16. Etc.) list them as well.
Testing and Integration Plans
Unit testing is via each developer deploying their change locally on their OOM deployment
Integration CD testing hourly via the following framework exercises the ELK stack pods in OOM
http://jenkins.onap.info/job/oom-cd/
reported on http://kibana.onap.info:5601/app/kibana
Work to formalize the CI/CD framework is being done via
| Jira Legacy | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gaps
This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.
| Gaps identified | Impact |
|---|---|
| To fill out | To fill out |
Known Defects and Issues
Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.
| Jira Legacy | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Risks
List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).
| Risk identified | Mitigation Plan | Contingency Plan |
|---|---|---|
| To fill out | To fill out | To fill out |
Resources
Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.
Release Milestone
The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.
Team Internal Milestone
This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.
It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.
| Date | Project | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|
| To fill out | To fill out | To fill out |
Documentation, Training
- Contributions: Logging Guidelines, the wiki and read-the-docs content.
- Highlight the team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset
- High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.
- Documentation includes items such as:
- Installation instructions
- Configuration instructions
- Developer guide
- End User guide
- Admin guide
- ...
| Note | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
The Documentation project will provide the Documentation Tool Chain to edit, configure, store and publish all Documentation asset. |
Other Information
Vendor Neutral
If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.
Free and Open Source Software
FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.
Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.
Charter Compliance
The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.
.