...
| Duration | Agenda Item | Requested by | Notes / Links | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
START RECORDING: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 15 | Co-chair
| 1) Email Polls: 2021 Modeling Subcommittee Decisions Approved the Initiation Poll on: CNF A&AI Data Model See Slides 4&5: Simplified K8s Resource Model Email Poll on Simplified Kubernetes Resource Data Model whether the “Simplified Kubernetes Resource Data Model (CNF AAI Data Model)” is ready to be moved to the “Clean” state. The related wiki page can be found at: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Simplified+K8s+Resource+Model And Slides 4 & 5 in the presentation describe the scope of the proposal for Istanbul: https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/103421962/CNFO%20-%20Simplified%20CNF%20AAI%20Model%20v1.5.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1624292553000&api=v2 Please submit only 1 vote per company to this email list. The polling period will be open until 14:00 UTC on 6 July 2021. We will address rough consensus during the 6 July 2021 Modeling Subcommittee weekly call. To vote: Please reply to this email (to onap-modelingsub@lists-onap-org) with: “YES”; “NO”; or “Abstain” to indicate: YES: The proposed model IS ready to move to the “Clean” State NO: The proposed model IS NOT ready to move to the “Clean” State Abstain: No opinion on this topic (Please only vote once per company) The chairs strongly recommend that clear rationale be expressed along with any “No” vote. Result: Yes: 3 (AT&T, Ericsson, Verizon), No: 0 2) Modeling current activity status. Provide the dash board of current status and how to involve: See: Modeling Current Activity Status Please keep updated Please capture modeling requirements for R9 here: ONAP R9 Modeling High Level Requirements Proposed Istanbul Release Schedule: Release Planning: Istanbul In JIRA, ONAPMODEL is the "project" we are using to capture Modeling Subcommittee release requirements. 3) Other Assess using newer version of Papyrus (2020-06) (Eclipse is integrated into package) Can access model and generate GenDoc, Seems to work Will check to see if there is a newer released version Is Gendoc being worked on? GenDoc in new version of Papyrus looks pretty good Tracy mentioned that O-RAN Alliance is interested in Papyrus about modeling. 1) experience in 3GPP SA5 5G network resource information model. 2) question about tooling between UML and YANG. Future mutual informal panel between ONAP and ORAN about modeling tool. Schedule discussions with Benjamin Cheung; Scott Mansfield; Martin Skorupski New way of generating documentation with Papyrus Jacqueline Beaulac [Ericsson] (with Scott Mansfield) Action item: we are about to make decision to move to the new version of Papyrus, Jacqueline Beaulac [Ericsson] volunteer to send email to call for comments in 2 weeks either during the call or in the list. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 |
| AAI Reverse Engineering status a new ticket is created:
Issues need to be resolved a new ticket will be created by Jacqueline to synchronize the version of openmodel. May need to use a newer version of Papyrus Got the file to load in Papyrus (thanks Scott Mansfield) Perhaps update AAI to remove hanging references. Explore next steps. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
...