...
| Practice Area | Checkpoint | Yes/No | Evidences | How to? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security | Has the Release Security/Vulnerability table been updated in the protected Security Vulnerabilities wiki space? | Table in in the protected Security Vulnerabilities wiki space corresponds to the latest NexusIQ scan | PTL reviews the NexusIQ scans for their project repos and fills out the vulnerability review table | |
| Has the project committed to enabling transport level encryption on all interfaces and the option to turn it off? | Requirements and test cases for transport layer encryption have been created for all interfaces not currently supporting encryption. | |||
| Has the project documented all open port information? | ||||
| Has the project provided the communication policy to OOM and Integration? | Recommended Protocols | |||
| Do you have a plan to address by M4 the Critical and High vulnerabilities in the third party libraries used within your project? |
| |||
| Architecture | Has the Project team reviewed the APIs with the Architecture Committee (ARC)? | Architecture walkthrough to understand how each project contributes on Release Use Case. ARC to organize the walkthrough. | ||
| Is there a plan to address the findings the API review? | Link to plan | The plan could be as simple as a Jira issue to track the implementation of findings or a documented plan within the wiki. | ||
| Does the team clearly understand that no changes in the API definition is allowed without formal TSC review and approval? | NA | In the case some changes are necessary, bring the request to the TSC for review and approval. | ||
Is there any changes in the scope, functionalities, deliverable, dependency, resources, API, repositories since M1 milestone? | If Yes, please a link to the evidence of these changes. | Critical point to understand is that change is inevitable, and that right timing and clear communication to the community will ease the process of accepting changes. | ||
| Provide link to the API Documentation. | ||||
| Release Management | Are committed Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Closed" in Jira board? | Provide Link to Project backlog | ||
| Are all tasks associated with Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Closed" in Jira? | ||||
| Have all findings from previous milestones been addressed? | Provide link to JIRA findings | |||
| Development | Is there any pending commit request older than 36 Business hours in Gerrit? | |||
| Has the project team reach the Automated Unit Test Code Coverage expectation? (Refer to artifacts available in Sonar) | Goal: 55% for Incubation project in the current release | Guidance on Code Coverage and Static Code Analysis Tools: Sonar | ||
| Do you have a plan to address by M4 the Critical and High vulnerabilities in the third party libraries used within your project? | Ensure by M4 the Nexus-IQ report from “Jenkins CLM” shows 0 critical security vulnerability. Open the Nexus-IQ report for the details on each repo. | |||
Are all the Jenkins jobs successfully passed ( Merge-Jobs)? | Provide link to evidence | |||
| Are all binaries available in Nexus? | Provide link to evidence | |||
| Integration and Testing | Have 50% of System Integration Testing Use Cases been implemented successfully in Jenkins? | Provide link to evidence | ||
| Has the project code successfully passed the Daily Build process? | Goal is to ensure the latest project commit has not broken the Integration Daily Build | |||
Has the project passed the Integration Sanity Tests? | Yes/No | Integration sanity tests in Dublin Release cover:
http://onapci.org/grafana/d/8cGRqBOmz/daily-summary?orgId=1
No Integration Blocking Issue with no workaround: Dublin Release Integration Test Blocking Issues |
...