Page Comparison

...

• Update / Progress
  • Michael O'Brien discussed with the Policy team. 
    
    • Policy team using Vagrant
    • They need ONAP 1.1.1 to work. Team agreed that making 1.1 working in Kubernetes is the top priority
    • 20170814: the 20170810 tagged master is working so far
  • DCAE Gen 2 dependency
    • AT&T has code available for DCAE gen 2. 
    • Should be available in a few weeks
    • It was agreed that the OOM team will require to make DCAE work on OOM, and then work on DCAEg2 when ready
  • Borislav Glozman has committed code for config management secrets management that is needed for non-Rancher deployment (defect 

    Jira Legacy
    server System Jira serverId 4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176 key OOM-3

    )
    
    • Commits have been done more than a week ago. Need committers to review and approve
    • Mandeep KhindaMike Elliott agreed to review by EOW
  • Michael O'Brien - (deprecated as of 20170508) - use obrienlabs has started contributing to the code but is not currently a committer. 
    
    • Add to committer list
    • 20170814: status - I was able to commit no issue.  

      Jira Legacy
      server System Jira serverId 4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176 key OOM-5

       in review/merge-conflict fix, 

      Jira Legacy
      server System Jira serverId 4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176 key OOM-62

       I will use a non-ONAP dockerhub for now.(thanks Mike Elliott)
• TOSCA based orchestration demo
  • Arthur Berezin presented concepts
  • Cloudify provides a consistent TOSCA model for app deployment
  • How does it integrate with Openshift or rancher? Answer: the operator will be allowed to chose options. Provides the flexibility of deployment.
  • Team agreed that the deployment mechanism must be a choice for the operator - nothing forced by the OOM platform.
  • Q: It seems you are wrapping a 50 lines file in a 500 lines file. Why? A: To provide consistent app descriptors across deployment mechanisms (openstack, bare metal, K8S, etc). 
  • Need to understand between K8S and Cloudify. Are we preventing K8S to perform its job by adding Cloudify on top? A: Cloudify is decoupled from K8S. We are delegating a portion of the orchestration to K8S. Cloudify is adding value on top of K8S, and letting K8S do what it does best: container orchestration.
  • Goal of Cloudify is really to use a TOSCA based approach to deploying applications.
  • John Ng presented the AT&T progress on Cloudify
    
    • AT&T needs to bring the code upstream earlier
• M2 functionality freeze
• Next objectives
  • Team agreed that making 1.1 working in Kubernetes is the top priority
  • Fix the ZOOM meeting for next meeting.
  • Arthur Berezin will share blueprint as seed code.
  • Need to allow people to push code that is not working
  • Team agreed that we should use an Upstream first approach to OOM (got a few +1's on the call on this one). Same concept should be applied to ONAP wide. David S to bring issue to TSC tomorrow.
  • John Ng will reach out to internal AT&T team members to see how soon the code can be uptreamed. The idea is to make sure we create a community around OOM. We need to avoid 100k commits.

...