/
OOM Meeting Notes - 2017-08-02

OOM Meeting Notes - 2017-08-02

Agenda:

  • Update / Progress

  • TOSCA based orchestration demo

    • @Arthur Berezin presented concepts

    • Cloudify provides a consistent TOSCA model for app deployment

    • How does it integrate with Openshift or rancher? Answer: the operator will be allowed to chose options. Provides the flexibility of deployment.

    • Team agreed that the deployment mechanism must be a choice for the operator - nothing forced by the OOM platform.

    • Q: It seems you are wrapping a 50 lines file in a 500 lines file. Why? A: To provide consistent app descriptors across deployment mechanisms (openstack, bare metal, K8S, etc). 

    • Need to understand between K8S and Cloudify. Are we preventing K8S to perform its job by adding Cloudify on top? A: Cloudify is decoupled from K8S. We are delegating a portion of the orchestration to K8S. Cloudify is adding value on top of K8S, and letting K8S do what it does best: container orchestration.

    • Goal of Cloudify is really to use a TOSCA based approach to deploying applications.

    • @John Ng presented the AT&T progress on Cloudify

      • AT&T needs to bring the code upstream earlier

  • M2 functionality freeze

  • Next objectives

    • Team agreed that making 1.1 working in Kubernetes is the top priority

    • Fix the ZOOM meeting for next meeting.

    • @Arthur Berezin will share blueprint as seed code.

    • Need to allow people to push code that is not working

    • Team agreed that we should use an Upstream first approach to OOM (got a few +1's on the call on this one). Same concept should be applied to ONAP wide. @David S to bring issue to TSC tomorrow.

    • @John Ng will reach out to internal AT&T team members to see how soon the code can be uptreamed. The idea is to make sure we create a community around OOM. We need to avoid 100k commits.