Passcode: 209247
We will start our meetings by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.
Attended | Proxy (w/ @name) | Holiday | Did Not Attend |
---|
Attendance is taken purely upon #info in Zoom Chat
| DT |
| | China Mobile |
| Ericsson |
| | Individual |
| AT&T |
| | Individual |
| Huawei |
| | Windriver |
| China Telecom |
|
|
|
| Agenda Items | Presented By | Presos/Notes/Links/ |
---|
Strategy (45 minutes) | ONAP takeaways |
| We are encouraging ONAP consumers to share with us their feedback, so we could prioritize our activities and make ONAP better suited their needs and requirements. |
LFN Cross-Organization UpdatesMAC, SPC, TAC, EUAG, LFN Board |
|
|
TCC / ONAP Liaison Updates |
|
|
Task Force Updates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations (40 minutes)
| TSC Activities and Deadlines |
|
|
Release Status | Byung-Woo Jun | - Oslo related Wiki under creation by Byung, Release Planning: Oslo
- O-parent removal from Oslo
- Ericsson presented their O-parent removal experience last TSC meeting
- Prepared for its instruction documents for other PTLs
- Will open Jira ticket(s) for O-parent removal from other projects in Oslo, as needed
- should we create a global requirement or should each PTL create its Jira ticket for O-parent removal?
- ARCCOM: open for requirement/architecture reviews
|
RelEng/Infrastructure | | - ONAP SonaCloud reports/scans still include some deprecated projects (e.g., MSB, DMaaP MR) - LF IT
- Need the main New Delhi pages for links - RTD doc; Thomas
Pending tikect opened by Marek: https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/desk/portal/2/IT-25573 - Kevin Sandi - a workaround solution will be tried;
- Marek / Matthew - automatic building solution is needed; escalate this?
- Kevin/Matt/Kevin - create a ticket and try a solution (maybe Github action helps? PoC??)
- Some action plans and updates next week
- Kevin and Marek are working on it, testing and deployment. will report its status - 90% is working; WIP; scheduled for next week update
Kevin: Jenkins' sandbox; security patching is working fine; downtime would be 30 mins; will notify the downtime by email to ONAP community - WIP Thomas Kulik - issues with Portal-NG and other documentation - IT-26899 Project is not created in RTD - Kevin; found a root cause; almost done, pushed the fixes; Marek: Verifying of fixing; will follow up when Thomas Kulik and Fiete Ostkamp back - next week report; related to RTD pipeline? need further testing Ticket opened by Tony: IT-26848 - Tony is checking on it, still has issues; Kevin will work on it; Thomas will check; should not block any? will work; report its staus next week |
PTL Updates | | - Policy-GUI deprecation in Oslo release has been initiated by Ramesh
- Policy team confirmed that "Policy-gui is currently not being used by any external components in ONAP. And policy-gui is dependent only on the policy-parent repo as its parent ."
- ARCCOM approved its deprecation, ONAPARC-804 - Policy-GUI deprecation in Oslo CLOSED
- OOM confirmed that it has no dependencies - checked
- At the TSC meeting July 11th, TSC handles it by email vote.
- AP: Sandra will send email vote to TSC for Policy-GUI deprecation. (due date: July 24th).
- TSC vote
- Project Gold Badging
- CPS got the gold badging
- Policy is working on it? Policy team got editing permissions for gold badging wiki pages
- What other components do we want to get the gold badging? PTLs need to follow the http://tlhansen.us/onap/onap.html tool for gold badging
|
Subcommittee UpdatesArch, Lab, Modeling, Seccom, Requirements, OOM | | - Two new UUI requirement/architecture reviews for Oslo will be done in end of July / August.
- Initiated DMaaP DR deprecation, which means ONAP deprecate the entire DMaaP from Oslo,
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System Jira |
---|
serverId | 4733707d-2057-3a0f-ae5e-4fd8aff50176 |
---|
key | ONAPARC-805 |
---|
|
- OOM - needs to analyze its dependencies
- TSC - needs to approve DMaaP DR deprecation and the entire DMaaP from Oslo
|
| OOM Update | | - General OOM update for Oslo: an alternative for ArgoCD-based deployment, in addition to the current deployment
|
| Open Source Security / SECCOM / ARCCOM | | CISA report on memory safe code: Other related articles: https://stackoverflow.blog/2024/03/04/in-rust-we-trust-white-house-office-urges-memory-safety/
2 actions: - OpenSSF- add/update their guidelines; Tony; WIP
- ONAP - impact assessment and reviewing if there are opportunities to remove those languages.
Added memory safe code guidance to the architecture security review template, ONAP Component Architecture Review Template
|
Events & Meetings (5 minutes) | Upcoming Events & Housekeeping |
| |
...