@Andreas Geißler

@Keguang He 

@Byung-Woo Jun 

@N.K. Shankaranarayanan 

@Dan Timoney 

@Paweł Pawlak 

@Dan Xu 

@Seshu Kumar Mudiganti

@Dong Wang

Strategy (45 minutes)

We are encouraging ONAP consumers to share with us their feedback, so we could prioritize our activities and make ONAP better suited their needs and requirements.

Operations (40 minutes)

@Byung-Woo Jun 

• Oslo related Wiki under creation by Byung, Release Planning: Oslo

• O-parent removal from Oslo

  • Ericsson presented their O-parent removal experience last TSC meeting

  • Prepared for its instruction documents for other PTLs

    • See Adheli's Removal instructions of O-Parent from Policy, Removal of O-Parent from Policy 

  • Will open Jira ticket(s) for O-parent removal from other projects in Oslo, as needed

    • should we create a global requirement or should each PTL create its Jira ticket for O-parent removal?

      • decision: each PTL creates their Jira ticket for O-parent removal. 

• ARCCOM: open for requirement/architecture reviews

• ONAP SonaCloud reports/scans still include some deprecated projects (e.g., MSB, DMaaP MR) - LF IT

  • @Paweł Pawlak , issued an LF IT ticket, https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/desk/portal/2/IT-26974

  • @Jessica Gonzalez  cleaned SonaCloud reports and @Kevin Sandi added his comments.

  • @Jessica Gonzalez  removed the sonar reports for the following components:

  • CLI

  • DMaaP Message Router

  • dmaap-messagerouter-dmaapclient

  • dmaap-messagerouter-messageservice

  • ExtAPI

  • externalapi-nbi

  • Holmes

  • holmes-common

  • holmes-engine-management

  • holmes-rule-management

  • Modeling

  • modeling-etsicatalog

  • modeling-yang-kit

  • MSB

  • msb-apigateway

  • msb-discovery

  • msb-java-sdk

  • msb-swagger-sdk

• Update ONAP main pages for New Delhi release (wiki.onap.org, onap.org) - @Sandra Jackson 

https://docs.onap.org/en/newdelhi/release/index.html#onap-release-notes use for page update. 

Pending tikect opened by Marek:

https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/desk/portal/2/IT-25573

• Kevin Sandi - a workaround solution will be tried;

• Marek / Matthew - automatic building solution is needed; escalate this?

• Kevin/Matt/Kevin - create a ticket and try a solution (maybe Github action helps? PoC??)

• Some action plans and updates next week

• Kevin and Marek are working on it, testing and deployment. will report its status - 90% is working; WIP; scheduled for next week update

Kevin: Jenkins' sandbox; security patching is working fine; downtime would be 30 mins; will notify the downtime by email to ONAP community - WIP

Thomas Kulik - issues with Portal-NG and other documentation - 

IT-26899 Project is not created in RTD - Kevin; found a root cause; almost done, pushed the fixes;

Marek: Verifying of fixing; will follow up when @Thomas Kulik  and @Fiete Ostkamp back - next week report; related to RTD pipeline?  need further testing

Ticket opened by Tony: IT-26848 - Tony is checking on it, still has issues; Kevin will work on it; Thomas will check; should not block any? will work; report its staus next week

• Policy-GUI deprecation in Oslo release has been initiated by Ramesh

  • Policy team confirmed that "Policy-gui is currently not being used by any external components in ONAP. And policy-gui is dependent only on the policy-parent repo as its parent ."  

  • ARCCOM approved its deprecation, 

    
    ONAPARC-804 - Policy-GUI deprecation in Oslo CLOSED

  • OOM confirmed that it has no dependencies - checked

  • At the TSC meeting July 11th, TSC handles it by email vote.

    • AP: Sandra will send email vote to TSC for Policy-GUI deprecation. (due date: July 24th).

    • TSC vote 

• Project Gold Badging

  • CPS got the gold badging

  • Policy is working on it? Policy team got editing permissions for gold badging wiki pages

  • What other components do we want to get the gold badging? PTLs need to follow the http://tlhansen.us/onap/onap.html tool for gold badging

•  

  • #Agee Policy-GUI deprecation in Oslo release has been initiated by Ramesh

• Two new UUI requirement/architecture reviews for Oslo will be done in end of July / August.

• Initiated DMaaP DR deprecation, which means ONAP deprecate the entire DMaaP from Oslo, https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/ONAPARC-805

  • OOM - needs to analyze its dependencies

  • TSC - needs to approve DMaaP DR deprecation and the entire DMaaP from Oslo

• General OOM update for Oslo:  an alternative for ArgoCD-based deployment, in addition to the current deployment 

CISA report on memory safe code: 

• joint-guidance-exploring-memory-safety-in-critical-open-source-projects-508c.pdf, 

• The-Case-for-Memory-Safe-Roadmaps-508c.pdf
  
  

  
  
  

Other related articles: https://stackoverflow.blog/2024/03/04/in-rust-we-trust-white-house-office-urges-memory-safety/ 

• 2 actions:

  1. OpenSSF- add/update their guidelines; Tony; WIP

  2. ONAP - impact assessment and reviewing if there are opportunities to remove those languages.

     1. Added memory safe code guidance to the architecture security review template, ONAP Component Architecture Review Template

• Future alternative of ONAP networking option (@Andreas Geißler ):

  • ONAP "Networking" Options (>=Kohn)

  • Istio Control  Plan is written in GO, but Envoy Proxy is written in C++; this could be one of the reasons that ambient mash could be interesting - TBD

Events & Meetings

(5 minutes)

• Next LFN DTF schedule?

• Open Source Summit Europe, 16-18 September, Vienna, Austria,  https://events.linuxfoundation.org/open-source-summit-europe/program/schedule/?utm_campaign=Open%20Source%20Summit%20Europe%202024&utm_medium=email&_hsenc=p2ANqtz--PLfjC2kdB72Wx4XhOtjd6bwBvLLrdHV1DgPkYzqDK9cRnhL3sp2wYC4MtZWhqGGElYxHdkvMaIgDLVAx0ZQS2YsStnQ&_hsmi=311371508&utm_content=311371508&utm_source=hs_automation