Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

BRIDGE: https://zoom.us/j/661303200?pwd=TFdRd0c2MTJUem8xa252UGJHTE1Mdz09

Passcode: 209247

We will start our meetings by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.

AttendedProxy (w/ @name)Gov. HolidayDid Not Attend

...

Agenda Items

Presented By

Presos/Notes/Links/

Release Status

Weekly status

Release Status

Istanbul: Test criteria for certifying the release

Integration Criteria for Stability/Resiliency Testing

  • what is the criteria that the TSC believes should be the threshold?
  • DT looking at test cases that can be unstreamed
  • Resiliency testing is a bit chaotic - intentional "breaking" of components in the stack
  • Stability Test Run - Success Rate between 85-90%?

#AGREED TSC approves that for Istanbul we maintain the current stability/resiliency acceptance criteria until  community members raise an improvement request to be assessed for the next release.

Security Testing:

  • discussion with SECCOM - belief is that security should be at 100% to certify a release.
  • sometimes false positives and unmaintained projects impact the ability to pass
  • 9 pods currently failing root pod test
  • exception lists need to be better documented - exceptions are excluded from testing.
  • example:  ESR is not excluded and no exception has been filed yet.
  • #AGREED since  the TSC is approving unmaintained projects in a release the exception filing should be made by the TSC itself.
  • Moving closer to CII Silver badging - Silver not yet a requirement

Infrastructure health check 

  • belief this should also be 100%


  •  Eric Debeau will created the slides & Andreas Geißler will present @ PTL meeting on  
    View file
    nameONAP-Integration-Test-Criteria.pptx
    height250

RelEng/Infrastructure

  • Tickets- Open showstoppers:
  • Tickets- Waiting on Community:
  • Migration Status / Upcoming Changes

Andrew Grimberg

  • Review of OOM Migration to  GitLab  
  • Namespace acquisition is WIP - someone has squatted on it.

PTL Updates

Krzysztof Opasiak

Discussion about scanning dockert containers

  • scancode.io and infrastructure to run it on is needed
  • License Compliance. - Talk was accepted for ONE Summit.
  • Currently set up as an internal resource - need a public resource to run it on
  • Need feedback from other folks 

Subcommittee Updates

Arch, Ctrl-Loop, Lab, Modeling, Seccom, Requirements



LFN Cross-Organization Updates

MAC, SPC, TAC, EUAG, LFN Board

  • GB meeting was on the 21st- reviewed the LFN Operations survey and a separate survey specific to the GB members themselves
  • LFN Membership meeting was yesterday - 2 sessions to accommodate different time zones.
    • Materials will be made available to the registered member contacts on file. Please reach out to them for the slides and the recording links.

TCC / ONAP Liaison Update



Task Force Update
CNF, Wiki 2.0, ONAP Enterprise


Next ONAP Enterprise meeting is scheduled on August 4th, 2021

  • SABRES (Secure, Adaptive, roBust, Resilient, and Efficient Slices) presented by Dr Eric Kline
  • Proposal of SABRES Integration into ONAP E2E Network Slicing call flows

TSC Activities and Deadlines

  • Honolulu Awards
  • Action items from June LFN event identified during the daily summaries calls - Plenary: Daily Summaries 
  • TSC 2.0 - kenny is still, still making edits (sad) (sad) (sad)

Upcoming Events & Housekeeping

<Available Slot>



...