Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 11 Next »

Agenda:

  • Update / Progress
    • Michael O'Brien discussed with the Policy team. 
      • Policy team using Vagrant
      • They need ONAP 1.1.1 to work. Team agreed that making 1.1 working in Kubernetes is the top priority
      • 20170814: the 20170810 tagged master is working so far
    • DCAE Gen 2 dependency
      • AT&T has code available for DCAE gen 2. 
      • Should be available in a few weeks
      • It was agreed that the OOM team will require to make DCAE work on OOM, and then work on DCAEg2 when ready
    • Borislav Glozman has committed code for config management secrets management that is needed for non-Rancher deployment (defect  OOM-3 - Getting issue details... STATUS )
      • Commits have been done more than a week ago. Need committers to review and approve
      • Mandeep KhindaMike Elliott agreed to review by EOW
    • Michael O'Brien - (deprecated as of 20170508) - use obrienlabs has started contributing to the code but is not currently a committer. 
      • Add to committer list
      • 20170814: status - I was able to commit no issue.   OOM-5 - Getting issue details... STATUS  in review/merge-conflict fix,  OOM-62 - Getting issue details... STATUS  I will use a non-ONAP dockerhub for now.(thanks Mike Elliott)
  • TOSCA based orchestration demo
    • Arthur Berezin presented concepts
    • Cloudify provides a consistent TOSCA model for app deployment
    • How does it integrate with Openshift or rancher? Answer: the operator will be allowed to chose options. Provides the flexibility of deployment.
    • Team agreed that the deployment mechanism must be a choice for the operator - nothing forced by the OOM platform.
    • Q: It seems you are wrapping a 50 lines file in a 500 lines file. Why? A: To provide consistent app descriptors across deployment mechanisms (openstack, bare metal, K8S, etc). 
    • Need to understand between K8S and Cloudify. Are we preventing K8S to perform its job by adding Cloudify on top? A: Cloudify is decoupled from K8S. We are delegating a portion of the orchestration to K8S. Cloudify is adding value on top of K8S, and letting K8S do what it does best: container orchestration.
    • Goal of Cloudify is really to use a TOSCA based approach to deploying applications.
    • John Ng presented the AT&T progress on Cloudify
      • AT&T needs to bring the code upstream earlier
  • M2 functionality freeze
  • Next objectives
    • Team agreed that making 1.1 working in Kubernetes is the top priority
    • Fix the ZOOM meeting for next meeting.
    • Arthur Berezin will share blueprint as seed code.
    • Need to allow people to push code that is not working
    • Team agreed that we should use an Upstream first approach to OOM (got a few +1's on the call on this one). Same concept should be applied to ONAP wide. David S to bring issue to TSC tomorrow.
    • John Ng will reach out to internal AT&T team members to see how soon the code can be uptreamed. The idea is to make sure we create a community around OOM. We need to avoid 100k commits.


  • No labels