Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 20 Next »

BRIDGE: https://zoom.us/j/661303200?pwd=TFdRd0c2MTJUem8xa252UGJHTE1Mdz09

Passcode: 209247

We will start our meetings by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.

AttendedProxy (w/ @name)Gov. HolidayDid Not Attend

Attendance is taken purely upon #info in Zoom Chat 

Time
(mins)

Agenda Items

Presented By

Presos/Notes/Links/

30

Release Status

Honolulu Release (M3 Feature Freeze)

  • Honolulu Milestone Status 
    • at 81% for projects
    • at 78% for the requirements (11 out 17)
  • M2 Exceptions - Architecture Review - Completed?
  • Honolulu Milestone and Requirements Exception Requests          
    • Exceptions must be submitted no later for March 4th
  • Discussion of delta between code reviews completed versus container delivery
    • Support needed from TSC to support PTLs with clarity on dates when things are due
  • DMaap Super-Committer Rights? (Need a ticket #)
  • Dec8ision on M3 being deferred until the PTL meeting on                            

Next Steps:

  • Finalize remaining tasks (projects and req. owners) prior the next PTL Call (3/1)
  • SECCOM to review inputs provided by teams i.e. Exceptions, CII Badging prior RC0
  • OOM to work with project teams on containers
  • Kick-Off Pair-Wise Testing & RC0 activities
  • RC0 issues published - scheduled for March 11
  • Honolulu M3 Lesson Learned: RC0 for improvements but not for new features code
  • Ciaran Johnston , follow-up with Fiachra Corcoran about IT Ticket concerning Super Committer rights
Time permitting

TSC 2.0

Continued discussion from TSC 2021-02-18

Discussion points

  • Company diversity
  • Level of contribution
  • Reserved seats
    • Seshu Kumar Mudiganti suggest carrier contributions
    • djhunt by type?
    • Alla.Goldner perspective that the EUAG is where influence of carriers can be made
    • Ranny Haiby as long as person wants to actively contribute to the TSC should be open to all - look at individual contribution not company contribution
    • Chaker Al-Hakim when a company joins ONAP is there an expectation may be that they have the right to TSC representation - djhunt note at the Platinum members get a GB and TAC seat
  • Number of members
  • Carrier & Vendor parity
  • Attendance - quorum adjustments?

5

Upcoming Events & Housekeeping

Guilin Award results on 3/4

Committer representative to the GB

Call for ONAP MAC Representative

CNF Task Force: OVP/ONAP Discussions postponed to March 9th, 2021









































Action Items

  •  

Zoom Chat Log 



Zoom auto-transcript service - These are often translated incorrectly and can be misleading. They are NOT Authoritative!   Information as to why .
They are included here as a time stamp cross-reference for the recording only!  The notes above this line and the actual recordings are authoritative. 


  • No labels