Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

"The project MUST have performed a security review within the last 5 years. This review MUST consider the security requirements and security boundary." – Best Practices Badging Criterion


Please fill in the survey questions for each of the following sections. In all cases, answer the questions from the point of view for YOUR application within ONAP.

For each one, additional information on the question is available to be read by clicking the arrow following the question.

Most items in this questionnaire are related to specific Best Practices Badging Criteria. The name of the associated criterion is listed at the end of the toggled "additional information" section, along with an indication of the badging level of the question, P=passing, S=silver and G=gold.


Once the security review is completed, the application owner can update the gold level badging question "security-review" as having been accomplished.


CPS-1140 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Security Knowledge

Know Secure Design

Do the committers and PTL know how to design secure software? Do the reviewers of OJSI tickets know secure design?

Your Answers-Please ExplainSECCOM Feedback / Recommendations
Yes, the majority of the CPS team & PTL are aware of security best practices and are experienced in mitigation and vulnerability resolution

Implement Secure Design

Do the committers and PTL apply secure design principles when reviewing software for merging?

Your Answer-Please ExplainSECCOM Feedback / Recommendations
Yes CPS team/PTL/committers review and look for security issues and recommend fixes before merging

Know Common Errors

Do the committers and PTL understand commonly found errors (and how to counter or mitigate them)? Do they apply these principles when reviewing software for merging?

Your Answers-Please ExplainSECCOM Feedback / Recommendations
Yes, the CPS team & PTL are aware of common security risks and how to mitigate them. There is also security checks in our CI pipeline

No Leaked Credentials

Do the committers and PTL verify that there are no non-test credentials and no non-test private keys in code to be merged?

Your Answer-Please ExplainSECCOM Feedback / Recommendations

We do have clear text default credentials in our docker-compose files if not provided (Only used for testing)


The user should override credentials and strategy around these 


Security Documentation

Documentation Architecture

Does your project have an architecture or high level design documented?

If so, please provide a URL to the pages on wiki.onap.org or onap.readthedocs.io that have the architecture or high level design. If not, please describe the high level design here using one or more paragraphs.

Your Answer-Please DescribeSECCOM Feedback / Recommendations
Yes, CPS architecture doc can be found @ https://docs.onap.org/projects/onap-cps/en/latest/architecture.html 

Documentation Security

Does your project have a description of what a user of your project can and cannot expect in terms of security from the software produced by the project, (In other words, what are its 'security requirements'?)

If so, please provide a URL to the page(s) on wiki.onap.org or onap.readthedocs.io. If not, please describe the security requirements here using one or more paragraphs.

Your Answer-Please DescribeSECCOM Feedback / Recommendations
None available

Assurance Case

Does your project actually meet its documented security requirements?

If so, please provide a URL to the page(s) on wiki.onap.org or onap.readthedocs.io that describe how the project meets its security goals. If not, please describe here (using one or more paragraphs) how the project meets its security goals.

Your Answer-Please DescribeSECCOM Feedback / Recommendations
None available

Vulnerability Mitigation

Vulnerabilities Critical Fixed

Have you closed all issues filed against your project in sonarcloud that are CRITICAL or BLOCKERs?

Vulnerabilities Fixed 60 Days

Are all vulnerabilities that are reported against your project, either through an OJSI ticket or publicly from CVE reports, fixed within two months of being reported?

Your Answer-Please ExplainSECCOM Feedback / Recommendations

Yes. Critical vulnerabilities/issues are compiled by SECCOM periodically and CPS project team resolves them in-time for current/prev release.

We also check sonarcloud reports on a weekly basis and if needed action is taken.



Non-Cryptographic Software Questions

The following are a few issues regarding your project's software as delivered that are not cryptographic-related.

Input Validation

Does your application accept input from potentially untrusted sources? If so, do you ensure that the input is valid before processing it?

Your Answer-Please ExplainSECCOM Feedback / Recommendations

We will receive a lot of models and data from NEs... are these trusted? 

Subscriptions also?


Hardening

Does your project apply hardening mechanisms so that software defects are less likely to result in security vulnerabilities?

Your Answer-Please ExplainSECCOM Feedback / Recommendations

Need to discuss from java/RESTful viewpoint


CPS does not have a UI and does not use javascript



Cryptographic-specific Software Questions

The following questions all deal with cryptographic issues.

Crypto Call – Generic

Does your software implement any cryptographic functions, such as hash functions, instead of calling on software specifically designed to implement cryptographic functions?

Your Answer-Please ExplainSECCOM Feedback / Recommendations
N/A

Crypto Random - Generic

Does your software use random information? If so, does it use a cryptographically secure random number generator?

Your Answers-Please ExplainSECCOM Feedback / Recommendations

CPS does generate random UUIDs for notifications.


CPS uses built in java libraries (java.util.UUID) for UUIDs.


Crypto Weaknesses

Does your software depend on any cryptographic algorithms or modes that have known serious weaknesses?

Your Answer-Please ExplainSECCOM Feedback / Recommendations
N/A

Crypto Working

Does your software depend on any cryptographic algorithms that are known to be broken?

Your Answer-Please ExplainSECCOM Feedback / Recommendations
Not that the team is aware of

Crypto Keylength

Does your software generate any keys? If so, do they use any default key-lengths that are considered insecure?

Your Answers-Please ExplainSECCOM Feedback / Recommendations
No, we don't

Crypto Algorithm Agility

Does your software use cryptographic algorithms? If so, can a user of ONAP switch the algorithm if one is found to be broken?

Your Answers-Please ExplainSECCOM Feedback / Recommendations
This does not apply 

Crypto Certificate Verification

Does your software use HTTPS? If so, does it do certificate verification of the host certificates by default?

Your Answers-Please ExplainSECCOM Feedback / Recommendations

We have not switched to HTTPS. 


We are planning to switch using service mesh


Crypto Credential Agility

Does your software save or process authentication credentials or private cryptographic keys? If so, is that information stored separately from other information?

Your Answers-Please ExplainSECCOM Feedback / Recommendations
No we don't

Crypto TLS1.2

Does your software support HTTPS? If so, is the minimum version allowed TLS1.2?

Your Answers-Please ExplainSECCOM Feedback / Recommendations

We have not switched to HTTPS. 


We are planning to switch using service mesh


Crypto Used Network

Does your software have network communications inbound or outbound? If so, do you support secure protocols for all such network communications?

Your Answers-Please ExplainSECCOM Feedback / Recommendations

CPS only communicates with components within ONAP


Not sure what is considered to be inbound and outbound communications

What is the boundary?


Crypto Verification Private

Does your software use outbound HTTPS connections? If so, does it perform certificate verification before sending HTTP headers with private information (such as secure cookies)

Your Answers-Please ExplainSECCOM Feedback / Recommendations

We have not switched to HTTPS. 


We are planning to switch using service mesh


  • No labels