Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 17 Next »

BRIDGE: https://zoom-lfx.platform.linuxfoundation.org/meeting/94501391330?password=c2f4cfa9-d9f5-4156-9ab2-c141fcdf671f

Passcode: 209247


Antitrust Policy Notice

We will start our meetings by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.

AttendedProxy (w/ @name)HolidayDid Not Attend

Attendance is taken purely upon #info in Zoom Chat 

DT
China Mobile
Ericsson
Individual
AT&T
CloudLinux/TuxCare

Guanyu Zhu (zhuguanyu)

Huawei


China Telecom


Antitrust Policy Notice


Agenda Items

Presented By

Presos/Notes/Links/



Strategy (45 minutes)

ONAP takeaways


We are encouraging ONAP consumers to share with us their feedback, so we could prioritize our activities and make ONAP better suited their needs and requirements.

LFN Cross-Organization Updates

MAC, SPC, TAC, EUAG, LFN Board

Byung-Woo Jun

LJ Illuzzi

Discussions between Arpit Joshipura, Byung-Woo Jun, Jill Lovato, Louis Illuzzi and Sunny Cai:

  • Highlight the value proposition of ONAP, including overall statistics (e.g., contributors, LOC, etc.) over its lifetime.

  • Provide deployment examples with links to DT, CMCC, China Telecom, Huawei, Ericsson, AT&T, TATA, Capegemini and others: hope we can finish our input for LFN by February 20th. 

    • Byung-woo to do internal review 

    • DT plans to deploy selected components into production environment (TNAP) this year - discussed during D&TF last year and in several TSC meetings

    • China Mobile & GenAI, @Keguang He , please summarize how China Mobile uses ONAP

    • China Telecom - using fork of ONAP (?) (presentation from 2024), @Dong Wang , please summarize how China Telecom uses ONAP

    • AT&T use case; Dan Timoney, please summarize how AT&T uses ONAP

    • What is Ericsson doing and why? Byung-Woo Jun , please summarize how Ericsson uses ONAP

      • got input from Ramesh Murugan Iyer for Policy (Thanks!!!),  and Toine Siebelink plans to provide his input for CPS
      • Ramesh's input for Policy:
        • Ericsson's new SMO offering is known as EIAP (Ericsson Intelligent Automation Platform) where the non-Real time RIC features in that are provided by EIC (Ericsson Intelligent Controller) component. EIAP aims to provide advanced automation and orchestration capabilities for diverse RAN environments (both traditional and ORAN).

          Refer : https://www.ericsson.com/en/ran/intelligent-ran-automation/intelligent-automation-platform

          Policy-clamp component from ONAP Policy Framework plays a major role inside EIC functionality in EIAP. Policy-clamp is responsible for the lifecycle management of rApps in EIC. It works together with EIC adapter microservices for the complete lifecycle management of rApps.  

          Apart from this, EIAP is also interested to use the opa-pdp component from ONAP's Policy Framework in their coordination-management component . This is at the initial level of discussion at the moment. But opa-pdp has a strong potential to be used in the coordination-management use case. 

    • Huawei, @zhuguanyu , please summarize how Huawei uses ONAP

    • Capgemini, Viresh Navalli, please summarize how Capgemini uses ONAP 
    • Tata, please summerize how Tata uses ONAP
  • Emphasize the product integration of ONAP

  • Use headlines like: "From Control loops and Intent-based to full AI Orchestration and Management." 

  • Highlight security contributions, such as those provided during the OPS 5G project by US Government for Networking slicing

    • Byung-woo Jun plans to add details about ONAP's service mesh and Ingress architecture and implementation

    • Mitre, NSA might be able to provide some info 

  • Address past criticisms of ONAP being too large and complex by emphasizing recent efforts, such as "streamlining microservices and modules, archiving legacy software, etc."

    • Byung-Woo Jun explained the ONAP Streamlining Evolution initiative to address these concerns

    • Has gone from a full “platform” to a collection of “network automation components”

  • This is one shot we get. Let's make it BIG!

  • Arpit's input:

LF GenAI Commons

Byung-Woo Jun

TCC / ONAP Liaison Updates



Task Force Updates



ONAP DTF Days 2025

Byung-Woo Jun
  • Byung-Woo Jun, created a page for ONAP DTF DAYs 2025; we plan to collect ONAP DTF session topics here before presenting them to LFN, and schedule for the event.

RelEng/Infrastructure

Byung-Woo Jun

Paweł Pawlak

Kevin Sandi ?

Matthew

  • LF IT migrating CI pipeline to GitHub actions - may take to the end of fall or later, once ONAP is completed for GitHub Actions , we will do security review. Last update from Matt is that LF IT is continuously shipping one project at a time. 

    4/2: in progress

    At the TSC Jess mentioned Q4'24? or rather beginning of 2025.

  • What is the current status of this?
  • Kevin Sandi, the LF Team, Matt and Kevin, plans to work on this; Please update the status

GenAI and Nephio White Paper

Byung-Woo Jun
  • Sana Tariq from Telus is leading this effort, with Byung and other contributors also contributing to the paper. LF is preparing for the publication.
  • Link: GenAI and Nephio White Paper

ONAP, O-RAN SC, Nephio collaboration on O-RAN SMO

N.K. Shankaranarayanan 

TSC Strategy

Byung-Woo Jun

TSC

From the Paris release, TSC needs to discuss ONAP focus areas and strategies / roadmaps

    • TSC members to add thoughts

Let's discuss more this year for Paris +

Any questions or feedback? 

Byung-Woo Jun presented the brainstorm at the TSC meeting this week.

Brainstorm:

  • Ensure ONAP core components are focused and operate independently, from build to runtime
    • DT finishes Argo-CD based component independent deployment
      • Argo-CD is a DT choice, but ONAP can allow other CDs, e.g., Flux (need contributors)
      • DT plans to productize some of the selected ONAP core components early next year in their TNAP production environment
    • Declarative and Intent-based component operations by the Repository-based Network Automation : see the ideas from ONAP Architecture Evolution - 2025.pdf
  • Make ONAP core components more autonomous and ready for use by both ONAP, LF and other external users
      • During New Delhi and Oslo releases, CPS and Policy achieved the OpenSSF Gold Badging status. Kudos to the team!
      • Continue to promote/facilitate other ONAP core components for the Gold Badging status (e.g., UUI, SDNC)
  • Incorporate more GenAI capabilities and use cases to the ONAP components, and promote the adoption of open-source LLM models and frameworks aligned with LF AI & Data and GenAI Commons
    • Collaborate with LF AI & Data GenAI Commons and Nephio GenAI for 5G and 6G
    • Open-source based models and controls
    • AI-Based Control Loop
    • AI Model-As-A-Service 
    • ETSI ISG NFV compliance for AI?
  • Foster inter-community collaboration with other LF communities, such as O-RAN and Nephio
    • SDNC enhancements (which is used by O-RAN OAM as is)
    • Resource-based Orchestration Pattern (leveraging CD and Operator)
    • Energy saving / monitoring 
  • Ensure the security of ONAP components and operations 
    • The latest security mechanism for communications (service mesh enhancements leveraging Istio and coming Ambient Mesh)
    • Deprecate unused sub-components and mitigate security vulnerabilities
  • Define a secure LFN CI/CD pipeline by leveraging OpenSSF-associated reference tools

Operations (40 minutes)








TSC Activities and Deadlines

Byung-Woo Jun
  • Updated ONAP Main Page update with Oslo.
    • ONAP Wiki 
    • The Architecture Overview for Oslo link does not work
    • louis li, and LT plan to update the onap.org site for the oslo release. 

PTL Updates

PTLs

Note: PTLs, thank you very much for closing the package update. 
Note: SO, SDC, MultiCloud and DCAE (without PTLs) are open; DT offered their help on  SDC, MultiCloud and DCAE. Thank you very much!!!
Note: Seshu and Sanket will check the SO package upgrade.

PTL Update

Fiete Ostkamp

Andreas Geißler

Keguang He

Byung-Woo Jun

Paris Release Status

Byung-Woo Jun

GoLang Job issues

murali parthasarathy k

Kevin Sandi

Deena Mukundan

Subcommittee Updates

Arch, Lab, Modeling, Seccom, Requirements

  • TLS 1.3 support thru the Service Mesh and Ingress Gateway? The current TLS 1.2 is broken. 

SECCOM

Paweł Pawlak

OOM Update

Andreas Geißler
  • OOM updates, charts changes such as SDC, policy-opa-pdp patches
  • Argo CD deployment
  • MR removal from DFC in DCAE (vresh navalli),
  • DB-operator use  issue (shrikant dhakalu tarale); some parts were fixed
  • Tata is testing Docker Image handling implemented by the Integration team; some issues on testing; Andreas Geißler is investing this; will give some updates

ONAP Youtube

Events & Meetings

(5 minutes)

Upcoming Events & Housekeeping

LJ Illuzzi

Byung-Woo Jun

  • KubeCon+CloudNativeCon, and Open Networking & Edge Summit, next April 2025 in London
  • Open Networking & Edge Summit Registration: https://events.linuxfoundation.org/open-networking-edge-summit-europe/register/
    • There are no community sessions for this event. It’s a 100% curated agenda. There will be keynotes by LFN and LFE, and strategy sessions.
  • LFN's KubeCon + CloudNative Con EU sponsorship that enables us to host Cloud Native Telco Day, we will have a booth onsite at the main KC + CNC show floor,  April 2-4. 

    Call to Action- LFN is looking for both community members to help staff the booth, as well as project or collaborative demos that we can showcase in the booth.


  • 2025 LFN Events- as per the guidance of LFN Governing Board
    • All projects can have a virtual dev event (with LF help) to focus on upcoming releases and strategy

    • A series of virtual workshops around a specific topic (to be determined by the TAC) - eg Domain Specific AI, Security, etc

Zoom Chat Log 


Zoom Meeting Recordings




Zoom auto-transcript service - These are often translated incorrectly and can be misleading. They are NOT Authoritative!   Information as to why .
They are included here as a time stamp cross-reference for the recording only!  The notes above this line and the actual recordings are authoritative. 


  • No labels