The content of this template is expected to be fill out for M1 Release Planning Milestone.
Overview
Project Name | Enter the name of the project |
---|---|
Target Release Name | Guilin |
Project Lifecycle State | Incubation. Refer to ONAP Charter, section 3.3 Project Lifecycle for further information |
Participating Company | AT&T, Amdocs, Orange, Huawei, ZTE, Nokia, IBM, TechMahindra, Fujitsu |
Scope
What is this release trying to address?
The scope of the Guilin Release of AAI will address Platform Maturity Requirements, as well the approved use cases.
Highest priority will be assigned to support security and platform maturity requirements. As next highest priority, AAI will support the approved use cases. Best-effort additional development will continue to support additional features not included in the approved use cases.
AAI R7 Guilin Release: TSC must have requirements
Requirements
Use Cases:
USE CASE REQUIREMENTS | DESCRIPTION & DISCUSSION |
---|---|
E2E Network Slicing | WIKI PAGE: E2E Network Slicing Use Case in R7 Guilin JIRA: - REQ-342Getting issue details... STATUS , - AAI-2916Getting issue details... STATUS , - AAI-2917Getting issue details... STATUS IMPACT: (see Jiras) Impacts to mS to extract fields from SDC. Need to investigate. E2E Slicing. Key contact: Swaminathan Seetharaman |
Configuration & Persistency Service | WIKI PAGE: Configuration & Persistency Service R7 JIRA: Test Only IMPACT: Test Only |
Intent Based Networking | WIKI PAGE: Intent-Based Network JIRA: - REQ-329Getting issue details... STATUS IMPACT: INVESTIGATION. Identified A&AI. Contact Huang ZongHe . Presented at the Architecture S/C. Possibly moved to POC status: Linked to:
-
ONAPARC-589Getting issue details...
STATUS
Arch S/C recordings: ONAPARC 2020 Meetings (Copy) Presentation https://jira.onap.org/secure/attachment/16127/16127_ONAP_Proposal_IBN+V1.7.pptx |
CC VPN Transport Slicing | WIKI PAGE: Guilin release - functional requirements proposed list#ccvpnTransportSlicingCCVPN-TransportSlicing An End-to-End 5G Network Slice consists of RAN, Transport and Core network slice sub-nets. This requirement is devoted to the realization Transport Slice sub-nets. It implements TN NSSMF, of which the functionality includes the modeling, orchestration and assurance of a Transport Slice. While TN NSSMF is a self-contained entity and thus this requirement can be independent, ensuring the integration with the E2E Network Slicing is an important aspect of this requirement. Standards-based interfaces and architectural framework (e.g., ETSI ZSM, IETF) are used by this requirement. Storing Slice ID, and which Element participating in the Slice. Swaminathan Seetharaman ; https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/display/LN/2020+June+Virtual+Recordings JIRA: - REQ-347Getting issue details... STATUS , - AAI-2920Getting issue details... STATUS IMPACT: |
PNF Software Upgrade | WIKI PAGE: Support xNF Software Upgrade in association to schema updates JIRA: - REQ-324Getting issue details... STATUS , - AAI-2935Getting issue details... STATUS IMPACT: Lead: Zu Qiang , Support xNF Software Upgrade in association to schema updates. VNF S/W version into A&AI. Done in eComp? ported to ONAP (confirmed) (from Chris Rapposelli-Manzo). Email sent from Lukasz to Zu Qiang Generic-VNF object in A&AI will have software-version attribute. It should be optional and should be of string type. Exemplary values are: "1.0", "1.0.1", "2.0.0" It is in the S/W but Not in Swagger file yet (version 19). Perhaps swagger not generated yet. How is the swagger file updated? Targeted for V20? still needs to generated and published. (will be other changes too) |
CNF Orchestration | JIRA: - REQ-341Getting issue details... STATUS IMPACT: DDF Presentation: https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/download/attachments/40370243/CNF%20Orchestration%20through%20ONAP.mp4?api=v2 Provide CNF orchestration support through integration of K8s adapter in ONAP SO
Led by Seshu Kumar Mudiganti Srinivasa Addepalli Lukasz Rajewski |
ETSI Alignment | WIKI PAGE: Guilin release - functional requirements proposed list and model planning page: ONAP R7 Modeling High Level Requirements JIRA: - REQ-334Getting issue details... STATUS IMPACT: Note: if AAI needs some minor schema changes for ETSI modeling, one of the ETSI-Alignment participating companies will update the AAI schema. It is part of the user stories. Fernando Oliveira leading this work. Byung-Woo Jun |
Multi-Tenancy | WIKI PAGE: ff JIRA:
-
REQ-340Getting issue details...
STATUS
IMPACT: Lead Olivier Phenix , Mike Elliott (AMdocs OOM) schema, multiple tenant pointing to same A&AI instance. Retreive operate on their own PNFs. (not available in A&AI yet). How to support multiple ONAP components on same cluster. Access Control. Can't tag PNFs. |
TSC MUST HAVES : AAI R7 Guilin Release: TSC must have requirements
Minimum Viable Product
- A&AI Core: Resources - CRUD REST API endpoints for A&AI inventory resources
- A&AI Core: Traversal - REST APIs for graph traversals. Some APIs use the Gremlin Server
- UI - An ONAP portal application used by operations for visualizing and searching
- Data Router: Makes decisions about workloads to be dispatched to search and tabular microservces. Includes logic to recognize and direct requests based on request archetypes.
- Search - Enable complex searches for sub graphs and functions that need to perform well across deeply nested structures using Elasticsearch. Used by the UI
- Cacher - The Response Caching Microservice (Cacher) is built to deliver multiple mechanisms of making API calls and populating the responses into a JSON datastore. The datastore is an embedded mongodb datastore, that stores cached API responses, which are updated via DMAAP events or can be synced by timed tasks or calls to the force sync endpoint.
- ESR - External System Registry component (provided community can deliver support, update vulnerable dependencies, and maintain the project)
Functionalities
List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.
Epics
Stories
Longer term roadmap
- In future release, AAI looks toward additional simplification of visualization of the data model
- Increased S3P, focusing on security and reducing turn around on 3rd party dependency vulnerabilities
- Historical Data Tracking down to the attribute-level
- Enhanced UI with animated state topology
- AAI looks toward geo-redundant clusters of the Cassandra database
- Tabular data views / aggregate views
Release Deliverables
Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note, etc) of this release.
Deliverable Name | Deliverable Description |
---|---|
A&AI resources | Executable. REST CRUD interface to graph database |
A&AI traversal | Executable. REST Interface for complex queries |
Data router | Executable |
Search-data-service | Executable |
Router-core | Library |
Sparky-fe | Library |
Sparky-be | Executable (AAI UI) |
Schema-service | Executable (delivers schema to other AAI mS) |
Graphadmin | Executable (graph administration functions) |
ESR | Exectuable |
OOM Config | Source code - configuration using AAI dockers in the k8 OOM environments |
Cacher | Executable - caching interface |
Sub-Components
See Resources and Repositories
Architecture
High level architecture diagram
At that stage within the Release, the team is expected to provide more Architecture details describing how the functional modules are interacting.
Indicate where your project fit within the ONAP Architecture diagram.
Block and sequence diagrams showing relation within the project as well as relation with external components are expected.
Anyone reading this section should have a good understanding of all the interacting modules.
Platform Maturity
Please fill out the centralized wiki page: Guilin Release Platform Maturity
AAI data is filled out
API Incoming Dependencies
List the API this project is expecting from other projects.
Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API freeze date.
Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.
API Name | API Description | API Definition Date | API Delivery date | API Definition link (i.e.swagger) |
---|---|---|---|---|
DMaaP | Eventing bus | |||
MSB | Service registry | |||
SDC | AAI Model loader consumes model objects | |||
AAF | Authentication / Authorization |
API Outgoing Dependencies
API this project is delivering to other projects.
API Name | API Description | API Definition Date | API Delivery date | API Definition link (i.e.swagger) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Third Party Products Dependencies
Third Party Products mean products that are mandatory to provide services for your components. Development of new functionality in third party product may or not be expected.
List the Third Party Products (OpenStack, ODL, RabbitMQ, ElasticSearch,Crystal Reports, ...).
Name | Description | Version |
---|---|---|
JanusGraph | Open-source, distributed graph database | 0.2.3 |
Cassandra | Open-source distributed storage system | 3.11 |
Docker | VM container | |
SpringBoot | Open-source Microservice application sever | 1.5.22 or 2.x |
ElasticSearch | Search framework | 6.8 |
HAPROXY | microservice front end | 1.8 |
Centos/Alpine | OS | See docker config files |
Testing and Integration Plans
Provide a description of the testing activities (unit test, functional test, automation,...) that will be performed by the team within the scope of this release.
TBD
Gaps
This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.
Gaps identified | Impact |
---|---|
To fill out | To fill out |
Known Defects and Issues
TBD
Risks
List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).
Please update any risk on the centralized wiki page - Guilin Risks
Resources
TBD
Release Milestone
The milestones are defined at the Guilin Release Planning and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.
Team Internal Milestone
This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.
It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.
Date | Project | Deliverable |
---|---|---|
To fill out | To fill out | To fill out |
Documentation, Training
Please update the following centralized wiki: Guilin Documentation
That includes
- Team contributions to the specific document related to he project (Config guide, installation guide...).
- Team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset
- High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.
- Documentation includes items such as:
- Installation instructions
- Configuration instructions
- Developer guide
- End User guide
- Admin guide
- ...
Other Information
Vendor Neutral
If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.
Free and Open Source Software
FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.
Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.
Charter Compliance
The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.