Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Current »

General Information:

  • Date and Time: 2019, Nov 11th, 10pm~11pm Beijing Time, 9am~10am US Eastern
  • Meeting Room: https://zoom.us/j/645982535
  • Meeting Recording: 
  • Meeting Chat Log:

Agenda:

  • Agenda bashing - 5 minutes
    • items for checking:
      • modeling glossary: gendoc templates check
      • ves spec: IM update check
  • License model proposal discussion - Kevin, 30 minutes
  • Modeling Process discussion - Ben, 20 minutes

Material:

Minutes:

  • Agenda bashing:
    • modeling glossary:
      • Kevin has started working on the gendoc templates
      • will first focus on class, datatypes and enumerations; would discuss whether to add attributes afterwards
    • ves spec update:
      • 7.1.1 update hasn't been finalized
      • current updates only have a minor affect on UML: modify association names, which is kind of "invisible" from the diagrams
      • would wait for spec to finalize first, then have a review for the updates on the UML diagram; could go for a quick review and approval if only association names are changed
  • Discussed items:
    • License model proposal:
      • the main problem is besides the SDC implementation, R6 also has a discussion for license use case, and the two are not aligned
      • Michela suggest to start with a discussion of use case before discussing models, to understand better how AT&T would like to have for license management in ONAP
      • Not all models in the current proposal are relevant for Ericsson and Nokia's use case, e.g., number of instances
      • what's the purpose of IM
        • document the implementation
        • design a common model that would be agreed by the community, i.e., drive future usage
      • vendor may prefer to have their own license management entity
      • next steps:
        • get service provider involvement
        • have a dedicate meeting to present E&N's proposal (no regular meeting for now)
        • utilize use case subcommittee calls for discussion, reach out to more service providers (like Orange); Timo could ask Alla
      • topics for modeling subcommittee:
        • use of stereotypes
        • different review process for models reflecting the implementation vs model for future design
    • Modeling Process:
      • no time for discussion
      • continue next week
  • No labels