Please find below the Minutes of Meetings and recording for the SECCOM meeting that was held on 25th of February 2020.
| Jira No | Summary | Description | Status | Solution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seshu | As Seshu did not join us, next week slot will be provided (if needed). | |||
| Guilin SECCOM priorities | P1: -Updates of the languages (java from v8 -> 11 and Python 2.7 -> to 3.x) – Interns from LFN could be gained -Updates of directly dependent software components (Here we are thinking about benefiting from LFN Interns that could support projects in their packages upgrades, in addition the new version of Nexus-IQ is able to display components with direct and indirect dependencies, we should define priorities, release manager should help in coordination between projects) -Automated security testing – containers not running as root – SDNC example P2: -Secrets management -No root access to the DB from main application container Currently we have some pods (i.e. OOF) that require root access to their mariadb-galera instance for main application to work. This is obviously a security issue. Each application should have its own DB account that allows to access only its own DB. -All config files inside the main container should be ReadOnly There are some weird design like in APPC where main container modifies properties provided by the user at runtime. I believe that application configuration should be read only. P3: -Increase of code coverage (to be honest in Frankfurt release it seems that not that much happened – I am not sure if each project proposed % feasible for them and followed the actions to achieve this -CII badging P4: -High Priority SECCOM initiative: service mesh recommendation -SECCOM initiative: OJSIs to be solved -SECCOM initiative: https communication We shall continue efforts for projects ongoin e.g. connectivity matrix, VNF Security requirments, CMPv2 etc. | Based on brainstorming session we agreed on the following list with topics grouped together. | List to be presented to PTLs and TSC . Efforts on service mesh to be continued to have a real alternative to AAF which is failing as of today. We hope AAF would be better with new PTL John but service mesh alernative should be explored with: certificates, mTLS, sidecar. | |
| SECCOM chair and vice chair elections | Confirm that the correct voting member for your company is on the Security Sub-committee Members list | Waiting for Kenny's feedback | Amy contacted Kenny to get information about process scheduling - February time frame?. | |
| Secrets encryption | Exchanges Tony-Krzysztof were done around the documentation. There should be a documentation on OOM charts (from OOM team to the projects) - as of today there is no such documentation at all. This is the area for improvement in the next release. | In Progress | Krzysztof to document in OOM including master password that has to be set at the deployment time. | |
| AAF client certificate | Feedback that Ramesh has putted few certificates to OOM repo resources. why not used aitomated certificates generation by AAF - feedback that those are not SSL certificates and automated certificates generation is only on server side and client side certificates have to be hardcoded in the repo!. We should not have any single certificate within OOM repo or any container image. Jonathan\s responses for hardcoding passwords are not clear... | Jonathan to be addressed and John Freney - new AAF PTL with Amy's support to clarify - to be followed-up offline.. | It looks very weird - to be further investigated with AAF team. Mutual TLS = both sides can use the same certificate. | |
| VNF Security Requirements | Amy asked for +2 for the reviewed items. | Jiras to be updated with comments (+2s) | ||
| Scripts for automatic Jira tickets creation for direct dependency components upgrades | PTL presentation on 10th of February. PTLs are concerned with many Jira tickets generated. No news. | Meeting with Ittay, Pierre and Pam to be organized. by Amy. | ||
| Bi-weekly meetings for security guidelines | Thursday's meeting slot is finally valid for Harald and invitation was sent to SECCOM distribution list.. | Data proposal was sent by Harald to seccom distribution list. | ||
| Upcoming F2F meetings | Decide which meeting(s) SECCOM wants to focus on Start collecting topics for the meeting(s) | In Progress | ||
| OUR NEXT SECCOM MEETING CALL WILL BE HELD ON 3RD OF MARCH'20 |