This page captures a draft of the recommendations of the working group on the project maturity reviews in July 2020.
Guidelines used by the working group (above and beyond criteria in the technical community document):
- Committer diversity - prefer 3 or more companies represented; if only 2, then need diversity in companies contributing
- S3P requirements not considered as gating for "mature" phase
- "Mature" phase criteria are more about projects being "active"
Presentation shared at TSC meeting.
Recordings of the working group meetings:
maturity_rvw_working_group_20200721.mp4
maturity_rvw_working_group_20200722.mp4
| Project Name | Recommended Disposition on moving from incubation to mature (approve, decline, revert) | Comments (for approve: improvements that could be made, for decline: steps needed to get to approve, for revert: information needed for recommendation) |
|---|---|---|
| AAI | approve | recommend improving committer diversity where possible |
| CCSDK | approve | continue improvements in code coverage, S3P, etc. |
CLAMP | decline | strong project, but need to improve company diversity in both committers and contributors |
| CLI | decline | need participation in the most recent release; need to document architecture review |
| DCAE | approve | continue improvements in code coverage, S3P, etc. |
| DMaaP | approve | recommend improving committer diversity where possible; recommend an updated architecture review |
| External API Framework | approve | improve wiki documentation on release content; continue improvements in code coverage, S3P, etc. |
| Holmes | decline | need participation in the most recent release; need to increase contributor and committer diversity; need recent architecture review |
| Modeling | approve | |
| MSB | revert | please add information on contributors/committers/companies by release; please add information on deployment/use of MSB by operators or others |
| MultiCloud | ||
| ONAP Portal | decline | need to improve company diversity in committers; please add information on review by architecture subcommittee; please add information on deployment/use of ONAP Portal by operators or others |
| OOF | approve | recommend improving committer diversity where possible; recommend an updated architecture review for any components not already reviewed (CMSO?) |
| Policy Framework | approve | |
| SDC | approve | conduct a more current architecture review with a focus on overlap of DCAE-D with DCAE-MOD. |
| SDNC | please update the wiki page with the new committers, | |
| SO | approve | please add information on test coverage; please add information on deployment/use of SO by operators or others |
| Usecase UI | approve | recommend improving committer diversity where possible |
| VFC | recommendation for future is to avoid bulk commits and & focus on steady contributions and commits. | |
| VNFSDK | revert | please document the review with the architecture subcommittee; please ensure that all committers are active |
| VVP | decline | need to improve company diversity in committers; please add information on review by architecture subcommittee; |