Attending
Sofia Wallin Andreas Geißler Thomas Kulik Timo Perala Eric Debeau
Topics, Notes, Status and Follow-Up Tasks
Topic | Notes / Status / Follow-up |
---|---|
| Sofia to send an email to discuss informing about this |
| Any nominations? No nominations yet. To be tracked the upcoming weeks. |
| Jira ticket walkthrough,
Invite Jessica to the next meeting for discussion around enabling voting jobs for warnings. |
| Current date is set to March 11th. Date needs be updated in the composite release note |
| For future collaboration and facilitation we will ask for a time slot in the arch subcommittee meeting to inform and educate how to work with docs. https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/doc/+/115497 |
| Follow up with Jessica. Any news from RTD on feature adding. When the build jobs are failing on RTD can we get feedback in Jenkins? |
| David McBride will join to discuss this further. Active projects vs maintenance projects. |
| Problem statement: The conf.py with the intersphinx mapping has different settings/configurations. Some projects refer to the latest branch and some stable/Frankfurt. After migrating we did see that some projects refers to latest even when choosing Frankfurt on RTD. Could this be because of the configuration or is the configuration based on whether the projects have created a release branch or not? Sofia Wallin From what I learned from Aric, we do not need to change the branch in each repo whenever a project creates their branch. The branch= foo in the conf.py only applies to the default rtd theme, it doesn't do anything for the theme ONAP is using. All projects need to have build the stable branch before we can switch the main doc to be the next release branch. |
@Aarna Networks | Final review. Rama presented their project summary. Feedback, We need to ensure that we mark or remove outdated/moved content from the wiki |
| Many links ara managed in RTD
There is a problem when a documentation linkes to a repo => the branc is not indicated. As result, the link points to the latest release Propostion to provide guidelines to be then presented for PTL Many links are broken => need to include a test in JJB and provide information about broken links Feedback has been given, positive output. Next step, bring to PTL Sill required from the project to test |