Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 16 Next »

1- Project Overview

The Policy subsystem of ONAP maintains, distributes, and operates on the set of rules that underlie ONAP’s control, orchestration, and management functions.  See Policy Framework Project Proposal (5/11/17) for more information.

2- New component capabilities for Honolulu-R8

The following table lists the new functional requirements Policy is committing to support for the Honolulu Release:

Requirements

Notes

REQ-429 - Getting issue details... STATUS

stretch goal

REQ-441 - Getting issue details... STATUS

already done

REQ-439 - Getting issue details... STATUS


REQ-437 - Getting issue details... STATUS

already done

REQ-398 - Getting issue details... STATUS

support only

REQ-396 - Getting issue details... STATUS

already done

REQ-473 - Getting issue details... STATUS

POC


The following epics are in scope for Honolulu, though are not required:

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Refresh

Some of the epics are just investigative for Honolulu.

3- New or modified interfaces

The following changes will be made to the interfaces during the Honolulu release:

  • Add a new API to PAP to query the deployment status of all PDP/policy pairs
  • In the health check API, include information about the availability of dependent systems (e.g., A&AI, DB, DMaaP)

4- If they are modified, are they backwards compatible?

Yes

6- Interface naming

See ARC Policy Framework Component Description - Honolulu-R8.

7- Consumed API from other projects

See ARC Policy Framework Component Description - Honolulu-R8.

8- Published API

See ARC Policy Framework Component Description - Honolulu-R8.


9- Reference to the interfaces.

See https://docs.onap.org/projects/onap-policy-parent/en/latest/offeredapis.html.

10- What are the system limits?

No more than one PAP may be run at a time.

11- Involved use cases, architectural capabilities or functional requirements.

Policy is used in the following use cases:

  • vFW
  • vDNS
  • vCPE
  • CCVPN
  • 5G

12- Listing of new or impacted models used by the project

None

13-Test plan/Testing Strategy

  1. Unit Testing
    1. Continue to use junit for java tests
    2. Continue to use ??? for javascript tests
  2. Dev-to-Dev Testing  and
    1. Communication between Policy components will be tested via Policy-specific CSITs
    2. There are no plans for individual dev-to-dev testing with other ONAP projects.  There are no facilities within Policy to test an interface independent of a use case, nor can other systems provide "sunny-day" responses without being pre-configured.  As a result, dev-to-dev testing will take place as part of the integration testing of various use cases.  This is unchanged from previous releases.
  3. Integration
    1. Integration testing will be done using the integration lab with a full kubernetes installation

14- Any other details that are specific to this functional enhancement or UseCase.

None



  • No labels