Information for PTL
This template is to be filled out for any project wishing to move to the "Mature" phase of the ONAP project lifecycle.
Once completed, remove this info box and the send the link for this page to onap-tsc@lists.onap.org to initiate the maturity review.
Per the ONAP Technical Community Document, the metrics for maturity review are:
›Successful participation in releases: The project demonstrates stable output (code base, documents) within its history of releases in accordance with the release policy.
›Architecture has been reviewed by the Architecture Committee
›Project is active and contributes to ONAP: The project demonstrates a stable or increasing number of contributions across recent releases. Contributions are commits which got merged to a repository of an ONAP project or a related upstream project. Commits can for example be patches to update the requirements document of a project, code addition to an ONAP or upstream project repository, new test cases and so forth.
›Mature artifacts produced: The project demonstrates that the artifacts produced by the project are deployable (where applicable) and have been successfully deployed, configured and used by end users (typically, service providers).
Review Submission Date: 07-06-2020
Project Description
Active and Available Inventory (AAI) is the ONAP subsystem that provides real-time views of Resources and Services and their relationships. AAI not only forms a registry of active, available, and assigned assets, it also maintains up-to-date views of the multidimensional relationships among these assets, including their relevance to different components of ONAP.
This project targets a logically centralized reference point for service and resource details serving other ONAP components and non-ONAP systems to enable fulfillment, closed loop, reporting, and other operational use cases. A&AI is critical to ONAP as the existing sources of truth do not provide a cross domain view and are not designed to serve this information to multiple clients.
Project Landing Page: Active and Available Inventory Project
Project Meeting Minutes: AAI Weekly Status Meeting
Leadership Resources
Role | Name | Linux Foundation Login (LFID) | Email Address |
---|---|---|---|
PTL | wreehil | wr148d@att.com | |
Committers | Manisha Aggarwal | ma9181 | ma9181@att.com |
Venkata Harish Kajur | vk250x | vk250x@att.com | |
James Forsyth | jimmydot | jf2512@att.com | |
@Steven Blimkie | sblimkie | Steven.Blimkie@amdocs.com |
Project & Release History
- How long the project has been an active: At launch
- Release Participation: Release Amsterdam through Frankfurt
- Engagement levels for past releases (up to 3):
- Commits per Release: see below
- Contributors per Release: see below
Companies per release: see below
Statistics taken from Bitergia : AAI Bitergia
Release name and timeframe | commits | contributors | companies |
---|---|---|---|
Amsterdam ( 1/1/2017 to 11/16/2017 ) | 812 | 67 | 11 |
Beijing ( 11/17/2017 to 6/7/2018 ) | 921 | 71 | 14 |
Cassablanca ( 6/8/2018 to 11/30/2018 ) | 748 | 70 | 15 |
Dublin ( 12/1/2018 to 7/9/2019 ) | 717 | 61 | 16 |
El Alto ( 7/10/2019 to 10/24/2019 ) | 201 | 18 | 8 |
Frankfurt ( 10/25/2019 to 6/18/2020 ) | 550 | 48 | 13 |
Use Cases: All use cases for various releases supported by A&AI can be seen here: Proposed Use Cases & Functional Requirements
Architecture Alignment
Artifact Information
- AAI GUI Documentation
- AAI REST API Documentation
- AAI Design Documentation
- AAI Repositories
- AAI project team members, contributed, in all ONAP releases, in the successful completion of integration team testing (various use cases see Proposed Use Cases & Functional Requirements)
- AAI is used by AT&T and Amdocs in production (may be others, Tech Mahindra, Bell Canada, Huawei, China Mobile, Orange, Yoppworks have shown interest and contributed)
Other Information
Code Coverage stats - https://sonarcloud.io/organizations/onap/projects?search=aai
- AAI Bitergia
James Forsythpresented "Visualizing the schema" at one of the DDFs
James Forsyth presented a report on community efforts for visualization at the Stockholm DDF
As a collaboration of ONAP partners working toward a standards-based data model for ONAP, graphgraph schema visualization and papyrus was worked with the modeling subcommittee.