Navigation

Schema and Code Proposals

Item 1. Notify ExtAPI so it does not need to poll AAI

In AAI, when the "orchestration-status", "service-instance-location-id", "input-params" for a Service Instance changes, notify ExtAPI so it does not need to poll AAI

• AAI does have precedent for publishing events to DMaaP
• ExtAPI to be updated to consume events from DMaaP
• need to get agreement about topic configuration
• Discuss with Adrian OSullivan and Ludovic Robert, to confirm whether existing AAI-EVENT topic in DMaaP suffices for this requirement

• From Jimmy Forsyth (AT&T) to Everyone: 01:51 AM
  @Brian, yes, AAI sends notification on all changes to DMaaP to the AAI_EVENT (or maybe it’s AAI-EVENT) topic

• AAI-1996 - Getting issue details... STATUS
• EXTAPI-98 - Getting issue details... STATUS
• James Forsyth  Can you please send us the details on what the format of the events are that are sent to DMaaP are from A&AI. For example is there only one topic called AAI-EVENT topic and any change on a service-instance is emitted to DMaaP.
 So regardless if the change is to orchestration-status or some other parameter, the AAI-EVENT is emitted. All pointers to any associated documentation, notes or code snippets appreciated.

In the case you are interested in, the service-instance can be CREATED, UPDATED, or DELETED (which you find in “action” in the event-header) either as a standalone object or as part of a nested structure.  You can use the top-entity-type to tell you which is the containing object, and then use that to determine if a service-instance might be impacted by the operation.  In the case of a service-instance update, the top-entity-type will be either customer, service-subscription, or service-instance.

For a customer or service-subscription, you would then look for a service-instance child object - in the example above, the service-instance would be in the position of the p-interface on a service-subscription and in the position of sriov-pf on a customer.  All of that depends on how the client uses the interface, and AAI has no control over it.  Since users can perform the operation at any of the 3 levels (with a DELETE object, sometimes there are rules about cascading deletes, I’d have to figure out of the customer/service-subscription/service-instance object hierarchy is subject to any of those rules (like it might not let you delete the service-subscription until all the service-instances are gone first; I just don’t recall the rules off the top of my head).

{
    "cambria.partition": "AAI",
    "entity": {
        "fqdn": "test.onap.org",
        "hostname": "pserver-onap",
        "in-maint": false,
        "p-interfaces": {
           "p-interface": [
               {
                   "in-maint":true,
                   "interface-name":"p-interface-02-test",
                   "resource-version":"1547072232613",
                   "sriov-pfs":{
                       "sriov-pf":[
                           {       
                       "pf-pci-id": "sriov-02-test",       
                       "resource-version":"1547072232613"
                           }
                       ]
                   }
               },
               {
                   "in-maint":true,
                   "interface-name":"p-interface-test",
                   "resource-version":"1547072232613",
                   "sriov-pfs":{
                       "sriov-pf":[
                           {
                              "pf-pci-id": "sriov-test",
                              "resource-version":"1547072232613"
                           }
                       ]
                   }
               }
           ]
        },
        "resource-version": "1547072232618"
    },
    "event-header": {
        "action": "CREATE",
        "domain": "ONAP",
        "entity-link":"/aai/v14/cloud-infrastructure/pservers/pserver/pserver-onap",
        "entity-type": "pserver",
        "event-type": "AAI-EVENT",
        "id": "ece20816-1c1b-4f22-9192-62459ee170c5",
        "sequence-number": "0",
        "severity": "NORMAL",
        "source-name": "jimmy-curl",
        "timestamp": "20190109-22:17:12:660",
        "top-entity-type": "pserver",
        "version": "v14"
    }
}

Regarding the "input-parameters", it was added for CCVPN use case (originally as "customer-requests") and there is an example in the comments of: AAI-CCVPN Schema Proposal for Casablanca Release For convenience, the comment is copied below: 

{
    "service":{
        "name":"ONAP_223531",
        "description":"ONAP_1546",
        "serviceInvariantUuid":"4a09419a-c9fd-4a53-b1bd-b49603169ca1",
        "serviceUuid":"1bd0eae6-2dcc-4461-9ae6-56d641f369d6",
        "globalSubscriberId":"test_custormer",
        "serviceType":"example-service-type",
        "parameters":{
            "locationConstraints":[
 
            ],
            "resources":[
                {
                    "resourceName":"vEPC_ONAP01",
                    "resourceInvariantUuid":"36ebe421-283a-4ee8-92f1-d09e7c44b911",
                    "resourceUuid":"27a0e235-b67a-4ea4-a0cf-25761afed111",
                    "resourceCustomizationUuid":"47a0e235-b67a-4ea4-a0cf-25761afed231",
                    "parameters":{
                        "locationConstraints":[
                            {
                                "vnfProfileId":"b244d433-8c9c-49ad-9c70-8e34b8dc8328",
                                "locationConstraints":{
                                    "vimId":"vmware_vio"
                                }
                            },
                            {
                                "vnfProfileId":"8a9f7c48-21ce-41b7-95b8-a8ac61ccb1ff",
                                "locationConstraints":{
                                    "vimId":"core-dc_RegionOne"
                                }
                            }
                        ],
                        "resources":[
 
                        ],
                        "requestInputs":{
                            "sdncontroller":""
                        }
                    }
                },
                {
                    "resourceName":"VL OVERLAYTUNNEL",
                    "resourceInvariantUuid":"184494cf-472f-436f-82e2-d83dddde21cb",
                    "resourceUuid":"95bc3e59-c9c5-458f-ad6e-78874ab4b3cc",
                    "resourceCustomizationUuid":"27a0e235-b67a-4ea4-a0cf-25761afed232",
                    "parameters":{
                        "locationConstraints":[
 
                        ],
                        "resources":[
 
                        ],
                        "requestInputs":{
 
                        }
                    }
                }
            ],
            "requestInputs":{
                "vlunderlayvpn0_name":"l3connect",
                "vlunderlayvpn0_site1_id":"IP-WAN-Controller-1",
                "vlunderlayvpn0_site2_id":"SPTNController",
                "vlunderlayvpn0_site1_networkName":"network1,network2",
                "vlunderlayvpn0_site2_networkName":"network3,network4",
                "vlunderlayvpn0_site1_routerId":"a8098c1a-f86e-11da-bd1a-00112444be1a",
                "vlunderlayvpn0_site2_routerId":"a8098c1a-f86e-11da-bd1a-00112444be1e",
                "vlunderlayvpn0_site2_importRT1":"200:1,200:2",
                "vlunderlayvpn0_site1_exportRT1":"300:1,300:2",
                "vlunderlayvpn0_site2_exportRT1":"400:1,400:2",
                "vlunderlayvpn0_site1_vni":"2000",
                "vlunderlayvpn0_site2_vni":"3000",
                "vlunderlayvpn0_tunnelType":"L3-DCI"
            }
        }
    }
}

Item 2. make use of "nodes query" to optimise some queries on AAI data

In client code using AAI API, make use of "nodes query" as shown in newly published documentation to optimise some queries on AAI data:

1. • https://docs.onap.org/en/latest/submodules/aai/aai-common.git/docs/AAI%20REST%20API%20Documentation/nodesQuery.html
     
   • Ludovic Robert For example instead of
     • "GET /aai/v11/customers/{customerId}service-subscription/{service_subscriptionId}service-instance API/{service-instanceId}"
     • use "GET /aai/v11/nodes/service-instances/service-instance/{service-instanceId}" instead

     • From Jimmy Forsyth (AT&T) to Everyone: 01:51 AM
       @Adrian the answers are yes, service-instance-id is unique in ONAP and you can query it directly with the nodes query (see link above)

   • See also  EXTAPI-194 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Item 3. Extra field in PNF to assist nomadic ONT scenario

Refer to discussion on https://groups.io/g/onap-bbs/topic/29523804 . Possible extra field in PNF to assist nomadic ONT scenario.  AAI-2151 - Getting issue details... STATUS

See also item 6 below:

Item 4. Change PNF unique key to be pnf-id

Change PNF unique key to be pnf-id instead of pnf-name attribute:  AAI-2096 - Getting issue details... STATUS  /  AAI-2148 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Item 5. Use “format” query parameter on Node Query to find service instance hierarchy

Refer to discussion  https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/15390 on https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/topic/29688799 and  EXTAPI-199 - Getting issue details... STATUS

1. 1. Get the full URL of the service-instance object when using the Nodes query to retrieve it.
   2. Pass query parameter "?format=resource_and_url" or "?format=simple"

Item 6. Specific decisions made for each attribute

Refer to BBS Modeling Model Design diagram for "HSIA CFS":

1. 1. Attributes and EdgeRules to add to "cp", "generic-vnf" and "pnf" (options TBD):  AAI-2154 - Getting issue details... STATUS
      1. Stavros Kanarakis  to add specific decisions made for each attribute based on the options described in JIRA

Item 7. Add robot test cases

• BBS use case related items added for AAI to https://gerrit.onap.org/r/gitweb?p=testsuite.git;a=tree;f=robot/resources/aai;hb=HEAD
• AAI-2184 - Getting issue details... STATUS

Item 8. Other current work

tbc

Possible Future Work

1. Referring to https://groups.io/g/onap-bbs/message/151: how to distinguish, from the AAI-EVENT alone, what part of the “service-instance” object changed, and what was it changed from.
2. tbc