Attachments (including meeting recording)
Status | OPEN | IN PROGRESS | ON HOLD | DONE | CANCELLED |
---|
Agenda Items
START RECORDING
Title | Raised By | Status | Last discussed | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Next week's meeting | Jimmy will be OOO on 8/29, need someone to host/record this call. | |||
2 | Helm Chart Common Templates | OPEN |
-
OOM-1936Getting issue details...
STATUS
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/91553 https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/aai/oom/+/91550 Use of common templates in the helm charts and have it driven from the values.yaml since all the helm charts are identical except the following things such as volumes, volume mounts, ConfigMap and secrets. The goal is to extract all that information in the values.yaml file and use common templates to enable more consistency. In each of the individual helm charts, we have a filebeat sidecar container, when creating a new helm chart, they just have to say if their chart should enable it or not in the values.yaml. | ||
3 | Kubernetes job problem | IN PROGRESS | 2019-08-14 | Message to discuss list: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/topic/32859796 We have a Dublin environment that had a Cassandra problem which caused the graphadmin-create-db-schema job to fail repeatedly. Question 1. Is there an ONAP-built-in monitoring solution for the shared Cassandra database? The Cassandra problem was a combination of: However, Kubernetes showed node-0 and node-2 still "Running" and apparently healthy (zero restarts), with node-1 in CrashLoopBackOff (many restarts). The Cassandra problems have been manually fixed now, but should ONAP have a monitoring solution built-in to detect it?
Deleting the failed job pods cleaned up the list but did not prompt any new job pods to be created. I think the job has now hit its backoff limit, so it no longer runs, even though we have since fixed the Cassandra problem. The rest of AAI pods are obviously waiting for that job to complete before they can progress out of Init state. Update:
| |
4 | BYOQ DSL wiki | OPEN | Referring to https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/cloud-region-fromVnf Wiki page says that output is: vserver vnfc tenant cloud-region but stored-queries.json definition includes: .createEdgeTraversal(EdgeType.COUSIN, 'vserver', 'pserver').store('x') So the output should also include "pserver"? Also, the wiki page shows The formatting of the traversal suggests that only cloud-region would be returned, which is inconsistent with the sections above on the same page. Which one is correct for this case? This is my attempt at a translation of the Gremlin query into DSL query: { "dsl":"generic-vnf*('vnf-id',‘id number') > [ vnfc* > vserver* > [ pserver*, tenant* > cloud-region* ] , vserver* > [ pserver*, tenant* > cloud-region* ] ]" } Please confirm whether this is accurate and correct. | ||
5 | Jenkins jobs | IN PROGRESS | 2019-08-08 | El Alto branch is failing but master branch is passing. Ubuntu node works but Centos node fails. Problem with releasing artifacts, since self-release is blocked, but LF cannot help with release. aai-common 1.5.2 appears in nexus, but it looks different from 1.5.1, missing the ".asc" files which appear to be GPG signatures.
| |
6 | AAI schema UML diagram | IN PROGRESS | 2019-08-08 | 2019-08-12 AAI Information Model Reverse Engineering
| |
7 | Review of AAI El Alto backlog | IN PROGRESS | 2019-07-25 | Getting issues... | |
8 | AAI-EVENT configuration | OPEN | While investigating and responding to https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/topic/32651336 discovered that topic name "AAI-EVENT" appears in some configuration property files but also hard-coded into some Java files. Is this topic name intended to be fully configurable or not? e.g. | ||
9 | AAI Alpine conversion | Dmitry Puzikov (Deactivated) | IN PROGRESS | 11th July 2019 | After some delay we were able to deploy ONAP with minimized AAI images and perform
|
10 | New UI Features / Historical Tracking | William Reehil | OPEN | The AT&T team has done an exciting POC at a sprint-a-thon event that they would like to share with the community. | |
11 | Alternative meeting system | OPEN | |||
12 | Review El Alto proposals | IN PROGRESS | AAI Epics/Stories in JIRA: Getting issues... | ||
13 | 2 Types of logging in A&AI WS | ON HOLD | 1st Nov 2018 | There are 2 types of logging in the services
Is that correct? Shouldn't there be just 1 type? 1st Nov: After Casablanca release investigate logging guidelines and figure out what library to use in order to unify logging within A&AI 26th Nov: See also ONAP Application Logging Specification - Post Dublin 29th Nov: how does this fit with - LOG-877Getting issue details... STATUS ? 28th May: Stela Stoykova is fixing - AAI-2462Getting issue details... STATUS . Are there more that should be done for El Alto? | |
14 | AAI Standalone UI Access/setup | IN PROGRESS | 2019-05-23 | - AAI-2418Getting issue details... STATUS
tried with below URL, http://<IP>:9517/services/aai/webapp/index.html response: Whitelabel Error PageThis application has no explicit mapping for /error, so you are seeing this as a fallback. | |
15 | Dublin Branching | IN PROGRESS | 2019-05-09 | El Alto runs Jun - Sep - technical debt and S3P/deployability release Frankfurt starts in Sep As of now, master will accept feature development for Frankfurt We tag dublin at release time (early June) The Dublin branch becomes El Alto (similar to a Dublin Maintenance Release) El Alto changes will be cherry picked back to master | |
16 | GraphGraph demo | Former user (Deleted) | IN PROGRESS | 2nd May 2019 | |
17 | AAI Modeling Multi-part key for schema elements | IN PROGRESS | 25th Apr 2019 | From https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/topic/31317665 Discussion:
| |
18 | Return codes and messages for WS | IN PROGRESS | 25th Apr 2019 | Is there a guide for the description of the error message and the error codes? How are new error states (message + code) added?
| |
19 | Purpose of fields in AAI | IN PROGRESS | 18th April 2019 | Dénes Németh wrote in - AAI-1104Getting issue details... STATUS : In think it would be good to answer what is the meaning of the field (collection of PEMs of the CA xor URL) Questions: 1. Is AAI intended to strictly prescribe how the fields are used and what contents are in the values? Even if (1) is true, AAI is not really in any position to enforce how clients use the data, so really (2) is always true and we need to consult the original producers of the data and the ultimate consumers of the data to document their intended meanings. How do we push to have documentation on the purpose and meaning of the fields in AAI? Where does all this documentation go? Should the documentation be backed up by validation code? See also discussion about AAI in 2018-11-28 ExtAPI Meeting notes 29th Nov: Started on new wiki page AAI Schema Producer-Consumer Pairings 18th Apr: Can we have this documentation go into ONAP in a generic way? 24th Apr: See also questions about "sw-version" in https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/5G+-+PNF+Plug+and+Play?focusedCommentId=63996633#comment-63996633 | |
20 | range query | IN PROGRESS | 7th Feb 2019 |
| |
21 | Schema-service roadmap | ON HOLD | 21st Mar 2019 | 31st Jan 2019: The schema-service is ready. Currently it provides file-sharing capabilities in terms of schema/edgerule files. In order for GraphGraph to take advantage of the schema parsing/processing in schema-service additional abstractions have to be implemented on top of the crude file2string functionality currently in schema-service.
GraphGraph needs the following functionality: Venkata Harish Kajur and Manisha Aggarwal What is missing in schema service that is needed in graphgraph is the following:
20. Mar 2019: Open questions for schema-service:
21st Mar 2019: Based on William Reehil comments https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/AAI+Schema+Service?focusedCommentId=45299262#comment-45299262 what is "our future proposed functionality"? | |
22 | New AAF Certificates at startup | Jimmy Forsyth | ON HOLD | 24th Jan 2019 | - AAI-2476Getting issue details... STATUS AAF will generate certificates to the be used by the containers at startup; AAI services should use the run-time generated certs instead of the ones that are in the repos or oom charts. In dublin the services will mount a volume with certificates. This is on the roadmap for Dublin as a feature.
12th June 2019: Jonathan Gathman demonstrated aaf-hello functionality at DDF event |
23 | AAI HAProxy and 2-way-TLS | ON HOLD | 29th Nov | Technical solution to either decommission the proxy or make design changes to AAF to enable client side certificates. After VF2F we will know if this is a requirement in Dublin. We discuss after this date. question raised: MSB - would client authentication be supported?
| |
24 | AAI Backup and Restore | ON HOLD | 10th Jan 2019 | FREEMAN, BRIAN D asked on Re: Backup and Restore Solution: ONAP-OOM : what would be the approach to backup an entire ONAP instance particualarly SDC, AAI, SDNC data ? would it be a script with all the references to the helm deploy releases or something that does a helm list and then for each entry does the ark backup ? What is the AAI strategy for backup and restore? What is the overall ONAP strategy for backup and restore? Should it be unified with the data migration strategy as per "Hbase to Cassandra migration" on 2018-11-14 AAI Meeting Notes?
Jimmy didn't directly raise the topic but there was movement - Keong Lim asked "if istio service mesh is a no-go, is there a replacement for secure onap communications? is backup/restore/upgradability included in s3p?" Michael O'Brien replied that a reference tool set for backup and restore was introduced in Casablanca: Backup and Restore Solution: ONAP-OOM Mike Elliott said he would look at Brian's question, AAI will provide support as needed. | |
25 |
There were errors rendering macro:
- An unknown error occurred.