30 mins

Cross-project discussion

• This meeting is reduced to 30 minutes

• host: @Byung-Woo Jun

O-RAN OSFG Fall 2025 Workshop

@Byung-Woo Jun

• @Byung-Woo Jun , presented the ONAP status and ongoing work in relation to O-RAN activities at the O-RAN OSFG Fall 2025 Workshop. The focus will include ONAP semi-standalone projects and individual deployments that can help facilitate adoption within OSC.

  • SDNC and OOM can be used in OSC

  • A GitOps-based onboarding plan could be an interesting approach to ensure consistent architecture across LFN.

• Reports:

  • As you know, the O-RAN OSFG Workshop was held last week at UNH, where I presented the topic of ONAP and OSC SMO collaboration (see attached).

    @Byung-Woo Jun presented it in a way that would capture the attention of the OSC key players. Based on the feedback and discussions, it seems our work is being recognized and appreciated by the OSC leadership. Notably, David Kinsey and others suggested moving the OSC SMO functions into ONAP - leveraging ONAP functions for OSC SMO. More discussions are needed, but this is now a real possibility.

    From my perspective, the current OSC SMO continues to face challenges in producing high-quality applications and lacks robust security support. I highlighted that ONAP’s modular components are already close to production quality, with flexible pick-and-choose capabilities. For example, DT has elevated several core ONAP components to production grade in their environment. I also emphasized that the ONAP security architecture (Service Mesh, Ingress Gateway, etc.) could significantly enhance the quality and reliability of the OSC SMO if adopted.

    We’ll see how things develop from here.

  • Expecting some discussions between the ONAP PTLs and TSC and the key OSC stakeholders.

  • OSC SMO collected ONAP logging architecture.

     

ONAP TSC LFN Budget 2026

@LJ Illuzzi

We are working on the 2026 LFN budget. Each LFN project is asked to provide budget requests for specific line items the project will need. This is the same process that has been used in the past and I added some input below. The LFN Board will be reviewing and approving the budget on its Oct 24 meeting.

 Target completion by Oct 9

DoD & Georgia Tech AI-based Anomaly detection

@Byung-Woo Jun

• DoD & Georgia Tech’s AI-based 5G anomaly detection demo, leveraging ONAP DCAE and other related components, is scheduled for the SECCOM meeting on September 30th.

• zoom: https://zoom-lfx.platform.linuxfoundation.org/meeting/97787508835?password=8196aa9a-a50a-4ae9-84ee-3de1fd3b35b8

• time: 8am EDT (12PM UTC)

• meeting recording: https://zoom.us/rec/share/3S-ZrpyhW_3QCn-9x8f4F4kkuqkVhQGdWYVxMSz6Bti7IM6Oh-PFYAJO0Hz9zY-u.c8KXVMetEyFNuIlI

• wiki and source code: https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/DW/pages/299499552

• @Muddasar Ahmed camara could be a model - to be investigated

•  

LFN TAC Update

LFX Insight incorrect contributor

@Toine Siebelink

https://insights.linuxfoundation.org/project/onap/repository/https:-gerrit.onap.org-r-cps/contributors?timeRange=past365days&start=2024-09-22&end=2025-09-22&widget=active-contributors

https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/desk/portal/4/SUPPORT-37700

• some contributor lists are not correct

• @Toine Siebelink , will create a ticket

• https://insights.linuxfoundation.org/project/onap/contributors?timeRange=past180days&start=2025-03-26&end=2025-09-22&widget=active-contributors

•  

WIP : Juansebastian Arias is working on it with Toine

@Toine Siebelink , the ticket was closed, but the solution is not correct yet. Plans to open a new ticket???

@Matt Watkins , shared the report, https://modeseven-lfit.github.io/gerrit-reports/projects/onap/report.html

Github action migration

@Kevin Sandi

• What is the current status?

• Setting up github action for ONAP

• PTLs, please review and put your input for Kevin.

  • https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/DW/pages/413499424

  • WIP

ONAP Repository Activity Report

@Matt Watkins

https://modeseven-lfit.github.io/gerrit-reports/projects/onap/report.html

ONAP White paper for Paris and 2025+

@Byung-Woo Jun

PTLs

TSC

• After the Paris release, we plan to publish a white paper on the ONAP semi-standalone evolution and key highlights from the Paris release.

• Jill Lovato also suggested hosting a webinar to support this.

• We can discuss which approach to prioritize—or consider doing both.

• @Byung-Woo Jun , White paper draft: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LlRhQp6okPEAKY7BfYOrz6rqCmj7seACW2SRwtMSW3U/edit?tab=t.0

• Plan to release it to the LFN Marketing this week

Paris Main Page Upgrade

@LJ Illuzzi

• update the ONAP wiki and onap.org pages for the latest ONAP release, Paris

• @LJ Illuzzi made the following changes, and handed off to the LF web team for changes.

  • onap.org is up-to-date - Done

  • onap wiki page needs to be updated

PTL report to TSC for Quebec

@Byung-Woo Jun

• CPS: working on the next release; continue on enhancements

• OOM: working on the gating pipeline

• Policy: released their first secure tag last tag; signed tag is automated by CI/CD

• Portal-NG:

• SO: springboot from 2.3 to 2.4

• UUI

• CCSDK/SDNC: some update on opendaylight for Quebec

• SDC: new images

• AAI: java 17 upgrade is done

• DCAE:

  • Will ask Georgia tech if they can do ONAP contribution directly? most likely not.

• MultiCloud: K8s pipeline is green, but one pipeline issue related golang; opened a ticket to LF IT, https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/desk/portal/2/IT-28681

  • @Fiete Ostkamp , is studying golang, plans to understand K8s pipeline. TBD

  • should be able to issue its image

• CDS

Quebec Cadence

@Byung-Woo Jun

• Open

  

Quebec Release Status

@Byung-Woo Jun

@Ramesh Murugan Iyer

@Matt Watkins

• Release Planning: Quebec

• https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/DW/pages/354123974 , will use this as the central wiki page for the key updates.

• OSC SMo use case collection??

• @Muddasar Ahmed 's suggestions

  • Requirement templates for security; automation using AI Agent? outside of traditional APIs?

  • from LF IT perspective, how much AI capabilities can be added into CI/CD (automation)

    • LF IT is investigating AI tools into GitHub and CI/CD - potential

  • get some meetings to discuss?

  • Ranny mentioned about Essedum use? (essedum vs. ONAP)

  • @Paweł Pawlak ,open a ticket for @Matt Watkins , https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/desk/portal/2/IT-28494

  • @Byung-Woo Jun will put IBM links here, https://research.ibm.com/blog/cryptographic-cbom-linux-foundation

  • https://research.ibm.com/blog/quantum-safe-cbomkit

  • Multi-tenant full stack separation/sharing on ONAP capabilities?

  • Georgia Tech AI-based security, https://github.com/gtri  

    • e.g., adding AI-based security features, leveraging ONAP (possibly DCAE, SDNC, and others)

    • - information will be available soon.

RelEng/Infrastructure

@Byung-Woo Jun

@LJ Illuzzi

• set up a monthly sync-up meeting

• So far, all of our suggestions are resolved.

ARCCOM Goals

Byung-Woo Jun

• ONAP and OSC SMO collaboration

Security

@Muddasar Ahmed

@Paweł Pawlak

• IBM donated CBOM. How to apply it to ONAP CI/CD?

• https://research.ibm.com/blog/cryptographic-cbom-linux-foundation

• https://research.ibm.com/blog/quantum-safe-cbomkit

• IBM presented the CBOM scanning tool to the SECCOM on July 8th

• SECCOM discussed it and will share the thoughts with LF IT

  • We may need project(s) for validation.

    • CCSDK/SDNC? - @Matt Watkins is working on it;

      • setting up testing environment; configured a sandbox; WIP

• Design NFs with PQC (e.g., serviceMesh with PQ-mTLS 1.3); may need user docs.

  • Byung’s action point, more to come; other members can contribute.

OOM Update

Fiete

• Gating issue; Ansible version 2.9; python version is not compatible with ansible. - fixed

• @Fiete Ostkamp , fixed

• SDC, helm validator… ; using springboot (migration) and others to simplify SDC. ; chart changing is ongoing;

IBM GenAI Doc

@Byung-Woo Jun `

https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/generative-ai

Testing Environment

Testing Improvement

CSIT Review

ToolChain Improvement

Documentation

Other Improvement suggestion

Sharing Best Practices

IF TIME ALLOWS ....

15 mins

Release status

5 mins

Upcoming Events

@Byung-Woo Jun