TSC 2024-06-27

TSC 2024-06-27

Passcode: 209247

We will start our meetings by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.

Attended

Proxy (w/ @name)

Holiday

Did Not Attend

Attended

Proxy (w/ @name)

Holiday

Did Not Attend

Attendance is taken purely upon #info in Zoom Chat 

@Andreas Geißler

DT

 

@Keguang He 

China Mobile

@Byung-Woo Jun 

Ericsson

 

@N.K. Shankaranarayanan 

Individual

@Dan Timoney 

AT&T

 

@Paweł Pawlak 

Individual

@Dan Xu 

Huawei

 

@Seshu Kumar Mudiganti

Windriver

@Dong Wang

China Telecom

 

 

 

 

Agenda Items

Presented By

Presos/Notes/Links/

 

Agenda Items

Presented By

Presos/Notes/Links/



Strategy (45 minutes)

ONAP takeaways

 

We are encouraging ONAP consumers to share with us their feedback, so we could prioritize our activities and make ONAP better suited their needs and requirements.

LFN Cross-Organization Updates

MAC, SPC, TAC, EUAG, LFN Board

 

 

TCC / ONAP Liaison Updates

 

 

Task Force Updates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operations (40 minutes)


TSC Activities and Deadlines

@Byung-Woo Jun 

ONAP component mature state, Mature State Projects

Now, we are handling ONAP component individually under ONAP Streamlining, exposing the components to users. CPS is the first case that TSC approved the mature state after ONAP Streamlining. Should we keep the projects under the list as "mature", or should we certify them again? Several components are deprecated.

Gold badging is a separate process from the project maturity in LFN?

  • CPS got the gold badging

  • Policy is working on it. SECCOM will review it once Policy team is ready, following http://tlhansen.us/onap/onap.html 

  • What other components do we want to get the gold badging? 

Release Status

@Byung-Woo Jun 

Oslo release has started, Release Planning: Oslo. (Kick off : May 30)

RelEng/Infrastructure

@Amy Zwarico @Jessica Gonzalez 

Amy Zwarico , created the following draft of repos to be removed from Jenkins (will be discussed this at ONAP SECCOM tomorrow):

  • Draft of repos to be removed from Jenkins:

CLI

  • cli

DMaaP Message Router

  • dmaap-messagerouter-dmaapclient

  • dmaap-messagerouter-messageservice

ExtAPI

  • externalapi-nbi

Holmes

  • holmes-common

  • holmes-engine-management

  • holmes-rule-management

Modeling

  • modeling-etsicatalog

  • modeling-yang-kit

MSB

  • msb-apigateway

  • msb-discovery

  • msb-java-sdk

  • msb-swagger-sdk

NBI (=ExtAPI)

  •  

OOF

  • optf-has

  • optf-osdf

VFC

  • vfc-gvnfm-vnflcm

  • vfc-gvnfm-vnfmgr

  • vfc-gvnfm-vnfres

  • vfc-nfvo-driver-svnfm-huawei

  • vfc-nfvo-driver-vnfm-gvnfm

  • vfc-nfvo-lcm

VNFSDK

  • vnfsdk-dovetail-integration

  • vnfsdk-functest

  • vnfsdk-refrepo

  • vnfsdk-validation

 VVP

  • vvp - CLM is already removed; need to archive its repo

@Jessica Gonzalez - done

Atlassian cloud migration

 

 

https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/desk/portal/2/IT-25573

PTL Updates

 @Ramesh Murugan Iyer 

@Byung-Woo Jun 

  • Policy GUI deprecation request by Ramesh Murugan Iyer for Oslo

    • The deprecation transition steps have been started, Project State: Unmaintained,

    • Ramesh provided the dependencies list to ARCCOM (@Byung-Woo Jun )

      • "Policy-gui is currently not being used by any external components in ONAP. And policy-gui is dependent only on the policy-parent repo as its parent ."

    • Plan to report this to PTLs, OOM and SECCOM next week before TSC voting

 Subcommittee Updates

Arch, Lab, Modeling, Seccom, Requirements

@Byung-Woo Jun 

  • Open for Oslo Requirement/Architecture review

Events & Meetings

(5 minutes)

Upcoming Events & Housekeeping

 

Zoom Chat Log 

 


Zoom auto-transcript service - These are often translated incorrectly and can be misleading. They are NOT Authoritative!   Information as to why .
They are included here as a time stamp cross-reference for the recording only!  The notes above this line and the actual recordings are authoritative.