PTL 2022-02-14

  • Zoom bridge: https://zoom.us/j/283628617?pwd=aWM3WjliUkFtcGFPUEdEMStIRll1UT09  passcode: 248130 
  • PTL Recordings
  • Antitrust Policy Notice

We will start our meetings by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.

Agenda

START RECORDING

Duration

Agenda Item

Requested byNotes / Links
1 hour

Cross-project discussions

Reminder:  Unmaintained Projects meeting today at 8 a.m. (Pacific).

If you would like to attend, but haven't received the invitation, please let me know.

LF IT Support


  • Tickets- Open showstoppers:
    • follow-up to Nexus3 instability 
    • IT-23485 IT-23559  Tickets will close on Monday

Michał Jagiełło reports that testing issues related to Nexus3 instability have been resolved

  • Tickets- Waiting on Community:
  • Migration Status / Upcoming Changes
    • Discussion of a couple of CI-MAN commits which are pending review. - Seshu and Jess to talk off-line

Liquibase licensing

Testing Environment

Intel → UNH-IOL Lab

Volunteers to test project workloads in new lab?

Testing Improvement



CSIT Review



ToolChain Improvement



Documentation

Other Improvement suggestion



Subcommittee Updates for PTLs



Sharing Best Practices



IF TIME ALLOWS ....
15 minsRelease status

Jakarta Release

Istanbul Maintenance Release

  • Proposed release date - Feb 17
    • Day-for-day slip for outstanding Jira issues or ongoing x-testing instability
    • Release note
  • Status of daily testing on Istanbul branch?

Sylvain Desbureaux reports that we should have new test results in the next day or two

5 minsUpcoming Events


10 minsRemaining Action Items




AOB

List of ACTIVE repos associated with projects in unmaintained state.  Should these be moved to READ_ONLY?

onap_tables_220214_ij_unmaintained_but_with_repos_not_set_to_readonly.xlsx

Team agreed that repos should be moved to read only.  No need to get approval from the TSC since the associated projects were already approved by the TSC to move to unmaintained status.  This is just cleanup work from that approval. Repos were associated with subprojects, so were missed when the unmaintained project repos were originally archived.

  • Thomas Kulik submit support ticket to LFIT requesting that active repos associated with unmaintained projects be moved to read only (PTL 02/14/22).
  • Thomas Kulik to review process for managing project transition to unmaintained status and recommend changes so that subproject repos are also moved to read only in the future (PTL 02/14/22).

Zoom Chat Log 


Action Items