Strategy (45 minutes) | ONAP takeaways |
| We are encouraging ONAP consumers to share with us their feedback, so we could prioritize our activities and make ONAP better suited their needs and requirements. |
|---|
LFN Quality and Security TAC | Byung-Woo Jun | - Byung-Woo Jun is an LFN Quality and Security TAC member
- Will update with input from the LFN Quality and Security TAC
|
LFN TAC Update | N.K. Shankaranarayanan | |
LFN Cross-Organization Updates | Byung-Woo Jun LJ Illuzzi | Discussions between Arpit Joshipura, Byung-Woo Jun, Jill Lovato, Louis Illuzzi and Sunny Cai: Highlight the value proposition of ONAP, including overall statistics (e.g., contributors, LOC, etc.) over its lifetime. ONAP messaging 2025 - Report the ONAP message 2025 to LFN TAC on March 19.
ONAP, Nephio and O-RAN WG11 Security Discussion topics, Nephio ONAP and O-RAN WG11 security-OpenSource..pdf |
TCC / ONAP Liaison Updates |
|
|
Task Force Updates |
|
|
LFN Board Meeting Update - ONAP Evolution Proposal | Byung-Woo Jun LJ Illuzzi Ranny Haiby | - Approved this proposal by LFN board
- ONAP TSC, ARCCOM, OOM, PTLs and SECCOM need to formalize processes for making semi-standalone projects (architecture, CI/CD, Project Release Cycle, Normalized APIs, Security, documentation)
Our proposals (Byung discussed them with Arpit, Ranny): - ONAP Organization Chart.
- The ONAP function will have a more descriptive namespace / prefix for external clients.
- For the time being, the OOM provides a lot of useful services for the ONAP projects. Therefore, the common services and OOM would be included by default. However, the telecom operators could choose alternative integration options; for example, if telecom operators prefer to use their own security, secure communications and CD (ArgoCD, Flux), we do not preclude those integration choices. We plan to provide comprehensive documentation on this.
- Strimzi, Istio, Keycloak, ONAP CI/CD pipeline, ArgoCD and Flux)
- Current common helm chart repo needs to be separated per project
- The ONAP TSC, ARCCOM and SECCOM oversee ONAP projects to ensure best practices, a uniform architecture, and security.
- The ONAP Documentation team will continue to provide official ONAP documentation for the time being
- Currently, ONAP project functions are decoupled from security, secure communication and deployment, giving operators flexibilities..
- ONAP projects will be further modularized, meaning that sub-components can be selected during the build. This modularization will provide operators with greater integration flexibility based on their use cases.
- ONAP projects need to minimize their dependencies to other projects.

The concept of elevating ONAP modules to semi-standalone entities was presented to the board and got positive feedback. One request that did come up was to clarify the evolution of the integration tests that are currently part of the ONAP-wide release process (will they still exist in some form to ensure interoperability between the independent modules?). The next step would be executing the necessary changes in the ONAP CI/CD system. I see that @Byung-Woo Jun already has a sessions planned for the ONAP DTF Day (https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/wiki/x/mICKBg) to discuss the next level of details. @LJ Illuzzi and I will of course support from the LF side. - Also, credits go to Ciaran Johnston and Christian Olrog
- Byung-Woo Jun,
At the ONAP DTF days, I plan to present the ONAP TSC roadmap and Architecture evolution, covering this concept. Working with DT and other ONAP participating companies, I have outlined how ONAP will enable the individual build and deployment of ONAP components under the ONAP Streamlining evolution; i.e., ONAP already supports these capabilities. The current OOM enhancements led by Andreas Geissler for ONAP CI/CD and ONAP architecture, leveraging Argo CD were tested during the Oslo release by DT and ARCCOM. Now, DT plans to contribute to ONAP CI/CD further by using both Argo CD and Flux during the Paris release. Additionally, China Telecom, China Mobile and DT have integrated several core ONAP components, referred to as Lightweight ONAP solutions, for their 5G and upcoming 6G. Over the past couple of years, under the ONAP Streamlining evolution led by me (Byung), we have established a solid foundation, which has proven to be valuable. Furthermore, ONAP TSC and ARCCOM have already discussed the possible integration solutions by leveraging individually built ONAP components. We are currently in the process of formalizing integration procedures and developing use cases for higher-level solutions. Additionally, I proposed the Runtime CI/CD for ONAP, and it will be part of my ONAP DTF Days presentations. I fully agree with this direction, and we are proud of the foundational work achieved through this evolution. More to come… We have seen the future 😊 I plan to present the evolution to the ONAP DTF Days, and I look forward to collaborating with you all. - Kudos to all ONAP contributors!!! Thanks!
- We need documentation for formalizing this new evolution. such as each each project documentation, API, security, release cycle, etc.
|
ONAP DTF Days 2025 | Byung-Woo Jun | - Byung-Woo Jun, created a page for ONAP DT&F DAYs 2025 - Planning; we plan to collect ONAP DTF session topics here before presenting them to LFN, and schedule for the event.
- Finalize the session topics and event schedule - TSC plans to decide today..
- LJ Illuzzi, TSC provides three potential dates. will set up for virtual meeting event, zoom, registration... next week meeting...
|
TSC Strategy | Byung-Woo Jun TSC | From the Paris release, TSC needs to discuss ONAP focus areas and strategies / roadmaps - TSC members to add thoughts
Let's discuss more this year for Paris + Any questions or feedback? Brainstorm: - Ensure ONAP core components are focused and operate independently, from build to runtime
- DT finishes Argo-CD and Flux based component independent deployment
- optimizing code for Flux
- DT is productizing some of the selected ONAP core components early next year in their TNAP production environment
- Declarative and Intent-based component operations by the Repository-based Network Automation : see the ideas from ONAP Architecture Evolution - 2025.pdf
- Make ONAP core components more autonomous and ready for use by both ONAP, LF and other external users
- During New Delhi and Oslo releases, CPS and Policy achieved the OpenSSF Gold Badging status. Kudos to the team!
- Continue to promote/facilitate other ONAP core components for the Gold Badging status (e.g., UUI, SDNC) - Ramesh, Toine, Byung will invite Fiete to give him a list of work items for gold badging.
- Incorporate more GenAI capabilities and use cases to the ONAP components, and promote the adoption of open-source LLM models and frameworks aligned with LF AI & Data and GenAI Commons
- Collaborate with LF AI & Data GenAI Commons and Nephio GenAI for 5G and 6G
- Open-source based models and controls
- AI-Based Control Loop
- AI Model-As-A-Service
- ETSI ISG NFV compliance for AI?
- Foster inter-community collaboration with other LF communities, such as O-RAN and Nephio
- SDNC enhancements (which is used by O-RAN OAM as is)
- Resource-based Orchestration Pattern (leveraging CD and Operator)
- Energy saving / monitoring ; N.K. Shankaranarayanan, rAPP in SMO is monitoring energy; it is an industry trend.
- Ensure the security of ONAP components and operations
- The latest security mechanism for communications (service mesh enhancements leveraging Istio and coming Ambient Mesh)
- Deprecate unused sub-components and mitigate security vulnerabilities
- Define a secure LFN CI/CD pipeline by leveraging OpenSSF-associated reference tools
|
Operations (40 minutes)
| TSC Activities and Deadlines |
| |
|---|
Paris Release Status | Byung-Woo Jun | |
RelEng/Infrastructure | Paweł Pawlak Byung-Woo Jun | Paweł Pawlak, needs a help from LF IT. LJ Illuzzi,will check it later, maybe next week |
RelEng/Infrastructure | Byung-Woo Jun LJ Illuzzi | |
RelEng/Infrastructure | Matthew Watkins | FYI, we have a GitHub reusable workflow that implements OpenSSF scorecard badging here: https://github.com/lfit/releng-reusable-workflows/blob/main/.github/workflows/reuse-openssf-scorecard.yaml FYI, we have a GitHub reusable workflow that implements OpenSSF scorecard badging here: https://github.com/lfit/releng-reusable-workflows/blob/main/.github/workflows/reuse-openssf-scorecard.yaml …and results for our repo here: https://scorecard.dev/viewer/?uri=github.com/lfit/releng-reusable-workflows Implementing it simply requires it to be added to gerrit-merge.yaml in your repository, so that it runs in GitHub when Gerrit changes are merged to the HEAD branch. Raise a support ticket/request in JIRA SD if you would like this implemented for your repository: https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/desk/portal/2 |
GoLang Job issues | murali parthasarathy k Kevin Sandi Deena Mukundan | |
Subcommittee UpdatesArch, Lab, Modeling, Seccom, Requirements | | - Will work on architectural changes for the self-standalone projects
- ARCCOM is working on the ONAP marketing catch points and architecture for the Paris release.
- PTLs, please plan for the ARCCOM reviews for your new features, requirements and enhancements for Paris.
- More ONAP Streamlining documentation, ONAP Streamlining Evolution and its sub-wiki pages.
- Runtime CI/CD collaboration and discussions with participating companies.
|
SECCOM | | - Upcoming presentation proposals from the 5G SBPs community:
- QORE: Quantumized Core Solution- Beyond 5G core solution integrated with post quantum cryptography. Proposal to be present on the March 25 SECCOM meeting.
- more work on quantumized core solution...
- Gold badging consultation to AAI?? aiming for AAI Silver for now
- Runtime CI/CD presentation by Lincoln Lavoie from UNH at the SECCOM meeting on March 4, 2025.
- Byung-Woo Jun, This could be a good study/investigation for ONAP Runtime CI/CD
- waiting for Lincoln's presentation slide deck
- Paweł Pawlak, possible E2E testing scenarios; program tests;
- Byung-Woo Jun, Should we work on the secure ci/cd for LFN?
|
| Byung-Woo Jun | |
OOM Update | Andreas Geißler | |
O-RAN Update | N.K. Shankaranarayanan | - Any O-RAN Update?
- ORAN F2F in Paris; O-RAN alliance focus group - more collaboration with OAI, OSC; try to make linkages between OSC and O-RAN Alliance (standardization body); ONAP is for SMO; SMO (FACOM and ...) and O-Cloud; ONAP needs to focus on intent-based and AI for SMO; AI-events for RAN and mobile?
Link to OSC sessions at O-RAN Paris Feb 2025 meeting: https://lf-o-ran-sc.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/EV/pages/284327937/2025-02+O-RAN+F2F+Paris (see demos on Nephi/OAI O-Cloud, OSC SMO plan, progress in O-RAN M-plane enablement) - LFN TAC, page status update; ONAP will check with the governing board what we need to do...
|
OpenSSF - Policy Gold badging | Ramesh Murugan Iyer | |
Events & Meetings (5 minutes) | Upcoming Events & Housekeeping | LJ Illuzzi Byung-Woo Jun |
LFN just issued a press release to announce the near-final speaker/session line-up for Open Networking & Edge Summit. Please take a look at both the PR and the updated agenda. This year's lineup is one of the best yet, with a broad representation of thought leaders from across the globe and across organizations (including many from this group - thank you!) Please spread the word about the event across your organizations and professional networks; here is a 20% Friends and Family discount code that you are welcome to share with your networks: ONE2520D
LFN's KubeCon + CloudNative Con EU sponsorship that enables us to host Cloud Native Telco Day. LFN will have a booth onsite at the main KC + CNC show floor, April 2-4. Call to Action- LFN is looking for community members to help staff the booth, as well as project or collaborative demos that we can showcase in the booth.
Reach out to Jill Lovato if you want to volunteer at the LFN booth or have a project or collaborative demo to showcase at the booth jlovato@linuxfoundation.org
|