PTL 2025-03-03
We start our meetings by mentioning the project's Antitrust Policy, which you can find linked from the LF and project websites. The policy is important where multiple companies, including potential industry competitors, are participating in meetings. Please review and if you have any questions, please contact your company legal counsel. Members of the LF may contact Andrew Updegrove at the firm Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the LF.
Agenda
START RECORDING
Duration | Agenda Item | Requested by | Notes / Links |
|---|---|---|---|
30 mins | Cross-project discussion |
|
|
ONAP and LFN Collaboration | @Byung-Woo Jun | Discussions between Arpit Joshipura, Byung-Woo Jun, Jill Lovato, Louis Illuzzi and Sunny Cai:
| |
LFN Board Meeting Update - ONAP Evolution Proposal | @Byung-Woo Jun @LJ Illuzzi @Ranny Haiby | The concept of elevating ONAP modules to semi-standalone entities was presented to the board and got positive feedback. One request that did come up was to clarify the evolution of the integration tests that are currently part of the ONAP-wide release process (will they still exist in some form to ensure interoperability between the independent modules?). The next step would be executing the necessary changes in the ONAP CI/CD system. I see that @Byung-Woo Jun already has sessions planned for the ONAP DTF Day (https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/wiki/x/mICKBg ) to discuss the next level of details. @LJ Illuzzi and I will of course support from the LF side.
At the ONAP DTF days, I plan to present the ONAP TSC roadmap and Architecture evolution, covering this concept. Working with DT and other ONAP participating companies, I have outlined how ONAP will enable the individual build and deployment of ONAP components under the ONAP Streamlining evolution; i.e., ONAP already supports these capabilities. The current OOM enhancements led by Andreas Geissler for ONAP CI/CD and ONAP architecture, leveraging Argo CD were tested during the Oslo release by DT and ARCCOM. Now, DT plans to contribute to ONAP CI/CD further by using both Argo CD and Flux during the Paris release. Additionally, China Telecom, China Mobile and DT have integrated several core ONAP components, referred to as Lightweight ONAP solutions, for their 5G and upcoming 6G. Over the past couple of years, under the ONAP Streamlining evolution led by me (Byung), we have established a solid foundation, which has proven to be valuable. Furthermore, ONAP TSC and ARCCOM have already discussed the possible integration solutions by leveraging individually built ONAP components. We are currently in the process of formalizing integration procedures and developing use cases for higher-level solutions. Additionally, I proposed the Runtime CI/CD for ONAP, and it will be part of my ONAP DTF Days presentations. I fully agree with this direction, and we are proud of the foundational work achieved through this evolution. More to come… We have seen the future 😊 I plan to present the evolution to the ONAP DTF Days, and I look forward to collaborating with you all.
We (CMCC) find the semi-standalone entity concept highly valuable. Building on this direction, we hope to evolve the UUI component into a semi-standalone entity integrated with large models and MaaS capabilities, while maintaining compatibility with the ONAP-wide CI/CD process. | |
ONAP DTF Days 2025 | @Byung-Woo Jun |
| |
ETSI NFV Liaison Report | @Keguang He @Byung-Woo Jun |
| |
GenAI and Nephio | @Byung-Woo Jun |
| |
TSC Strategy and Plans | @Byung-Woo Jun | PTL input? Byung-Woo Jun presented the brainstorm at the TSC meeting this week. Brainstorm:
| |
Paris Release Update | @Byung-Woo Jun PTLs
|
| |
Paris Architedcture | @Byung-Woo Jun |
| |
Security | @Amy Zwarico @Paweł Pawlak @Byung-Woo Jun |
| |
GoLang Job Issues | @murali parthasarathy k @Deena Mukundan @Ramesh Murugan Iyer @Kevin Sandi |
| |
RelEng/Infrastructure | @Kevin Sandi | For Paris @Toine Siebelink , created a new ticket, https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/desk/portal/2/IT-27475 .
| |
OOM Update | @Andreas Geißler |
| |
NexusIQ V Spreadsheet | @Amy Zwarico |
| |
Testing Environment |
|
| |
Testing Improvement |
|
| |
CSIT Review |
|
| |
ToolChain Improvement |
|
| |
Documentation |
|
| |
Other Improvement suggestion |
|
| |
Sharing Best Practices |
|
| |
IF TIME ALLOWS .... | |||
15 mins | Release status |
|
|
5 mins | Upcoming Events | @LJ Illuzzi @Byung-Woo Jun
|
Reach out to Jill Lovato if you want to volunteer at the LFN booth or have a project or collaborative demo to showcase at the booth
|
10 mins | Remaining Action Items |
|
|
Zoom Recordings
Zoom Chat Log