SDN Controller Component Documentation – Montreal-R13
Page Status: Updated for Jakarta - Dec 7, 2021
Component Status: Reviewed Dec 7, 2021
Last Reviewed on: Dec 7, 2021
Certified by: @Dan Timoney
1. High Level Component Definition and Architectural Relationships
SDN-C / App-C:
Note: ONAP has two application level configuration and lifecycle management modules called SDN-C and App-C. Both provide similar services (application level configuration using NetConf, Chef, Ansible, RestConf, etc.) and life cycle management functions (e.g. Stop, resume, health check, etc.). They share common code from CCSDK repo. However, there are some differences between these two modules (SDN-C uses CDS only for onboarding and configuration / LCM flow design, whereas App-C uses CDT for the LCM functions for self service to provide artifacts storing in APP-C Database). SDN-C has been used mainly for Layer1-3 network elements and App-C is being used for Layer4-7 network functions. This is a very loose distinction and we expect that over time we will get better alignment and have common repository for controller code supporting application level configuration and lifecycle management of all network elements (physical or virtual, layer 1-7). Because of these overlaps, we have documented SDN-C and App-C together.
ONAP Controller Family (SDN-C / App-C) configures and maintains the health ofL1-7 Network Function (VNF, PNF, CNFs) and network services throughout their lifecycle
Configure Network Functions (VNF/PNF)
Provides programmable network application management platform:
Behavior patterns programmed via models and policies
Standards based models &protocols for multi-vendor implementation
Extensible SB adapters such as Netconf, Ansible, Rest API, etc.
Operational control, version management, software updates, etc.
Local source of truth
Manages inventory within its scope
Manages and stores state of NFs
Supports Configuration Audits
2. SDN-C/APP-C API definitions
Controller provides the following interfaces:
Interface Name | Interface Definition | Interface Capabilities | API Spec (Swagger) |
---|---|---|---|
ORAN-Policy | A1 policy management updates | An interface to accept policy management updates for distribution to managed non-RT RICs | |
CONE-1 | Operations Interface APP-C : LCM | An interface to request for Lifecycle management operations on network resources. This is the same interface as CONE-2, but is invoked by a command line tool (e.g. curl) instead of by a system. | No Swagger, but documented in ReadTheDocs |
CONE-2 | OSS Interface APP-C : LCM | An interface to request for Lifecycle management operations on network resources | No Swagger, but documented in ReadTheDocs |
CONE-3 | Service Order Interface (GENERIC-RESOURCE-API) | An interface to request for Configuration and Lifecycle management operations on network resources | |
CONE-4 | Policy Interface SDN-C: LCM | An interface to support LCM requests such as Restart, Rebuild, Migrate, Evacuate operations on network resources (APP-C interfaces with openstack to send those LCM requests to VNF/VNF-C/VM) | Swagger TBD - Interface format is the same as APP-C LCM (see ReadTheDocs) |
The current API documents can be found at:
https://docs.onap.org/projects/onap-appc/en/latest/APPC-LCM-API-Guide/APPC-LCM-API-Guide.html
https://docs.onap.org/projects/onap-sdnc-oam/en/latest/apis/genericresource.html
Controller consumes the following interfaces:
Interface Name | Interface Definition | Interface Capabilities | API Spec (Swagger) |
---|---|---|---|
CONE-5 | Rest API | An interface for communication with external systems such as IP management | |
CONE-6 | Resource Chef API | An interface for configuration and Lifecycle management of network resources using Chef protocol | |
CONE-7 | Resource NetConf API | An interface for configuration and Lifecycle management of network resources using NetConf protocol | |
CONE-8 | Resource Ansible API | An interface for configuration and Lifecycle management of network resources using Ansible protocol | |
SDCE-6 | SDC Interface | An interface to receive resource Templates from SDC design catalog | |
CDSE-1 | CDS Interface | An interface to receive resource blueprint from CDS | |
AAIE-1 | Inventory Service Interface | An interface to create, update, query, and delete resource information and relationships | |
POE-2a | PDP Query API | Policy Decision Point query for IP address |
3. Component Description:
4. known system limitations
Lack of clarity & roles in the controller (which controller does what?)
Proliferation of controller instances (many similar yet different controller instances)
Divergence of controller implementation (lack of common controller framework)
Duplicate and uncoordinated interfaces (lack of uniform common services in southbound interfaces)
Controller resiliency and horizontal scaling
5. Used Models
Controllers use the following models:
TOSCA
YANG
6. System Deployment Architecture
Controller consists of the following containers:
CDS-UI container - Design Time
SDC-CDS Listener container - Design Time
CDT-UI container - Design Time
Controller Blueprint MS Container - Design Time
Blueprint Processor MS Container - Run Time
Command Executor Container - Run Time
CDS Database Container - Run Time
DG Builder Container - Design Time
Admin Portal Container - Run Time
SDC Listener Container - Run Time
DMAAP Listener Container - Run Time
Controller (ODL) Container - Run Time
Network Name Gen MS Container - Run Time
Ansible Server Container - Run Time
MariaDB Galera - Platform Service
Netbox - Platform Service
RunTime Config DB - Run Time
A1 Policy Manager - Run Time
7. New Release Capabilities
Upgrade of ODL to Phosphorus SR (Service Release) 1
OpenDaylight separation:
For Jakarta, we plan to provide 2 implementations of GENERIC-RESOURCE-API:
The current implementation, implemented as an OSGi feature deployed in the OpenDaylight karaf container.
A new springboot-based microservice, which runs in a pod outside of OpenDaylight
We eventually would like to replace the current implementation with the springboot-based implementation, and run OpenDaylight as a separate pod. However, there is still some work required to close feature gaps in the springboot-based implementation before we can do so without breaking existing functionality.
In Jakarta, we plan to conduct a proof of concept of the work done to date. For this proof of concept, we will replace the SDNC controller in our local kubernetes test environment with the springboot-based version and run the standard OOM gating test suite to determine whether that the implementation to date is fully backwards compatible.
8. References
APP-C overview & User Guide: https://docs.onap.org/projects/onap-appc-deployment/en/latest/index.html
SDN-C overview & User Guide: https://docs.onap.org/projects/onap-sdnc-oam/en/latest/index.html