Service Orchestrator Jakarta Review

The content of this template is expected to be fill out for M1 Release Planning Milestone.


Overview

Project Name

Enter the name of the project

Project Name

Enter the name of the project

Target Release Name

Jakarta

Project Lifecycle State

Incubation

Participating Company 

AT&T, Amdocs, Bell Canada, CMCC, DT, Ericsson, Fujitsu, Huawei, Intel, Lumina Networks, Nokia, Orange, Samsung, Tech Mahindra, Verizon

Scope

What is this release trying to address?

Improve the platform maturity of SO project and cleanup some of the key technical backlogs and support certain key functionalities of Istanbul release.

Requirements

Explained in detail in the below sections.

Minimum Viable Product

Deliver all the needed docker images and DB to support SO core functionality and the needed scripts for deploying it in OOM.

Functionalities

List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.

Key Requirements Epics for Honoloulu, impacting SO





Use Cases :

Greetings, As per the new process set in place, we need to have the TSC must have requirements also to be completed for us to qualify for the release.



Functional Requirements :

Epics:

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh

SO Backlog Overview - Not committed for the release (except for stories that have been captured in the above table), best effort

key summary type updated assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

Longer term roadmap

SO aims to highest level of orchestration which is model driven and generic enough to both traditional and Cloud Native scenarios alike.

Release Deliverables

Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note, etc) of this release.

Deliverable Name

Deliverable Description

Deliverable Name

Deliverable Description

SO Docker Images

Docker Images, details  can be found below

SO libs

libs





Sub-Components

List all sub-components part of this release.
Activities related to sub-components must be in sync with the overall release.

Sub-components are repositories and are consolidated in a single centralized place. Edit the Release Components name for your project in the centralized page.

- so-bpmn-infra
- so-catalog-db-adapter
- so-admin-cockpit
- so-nssmf-adapter
- so-openstack-adapter
- so-request-db-adapter
- so-sdc-controller
- so-sdnc-adapter
- so-sol003-adapter
- so-api-handler-infra
- so-etsi-nfvo-ns-lcm
- so-oof-adapter
- so-cnf-adapter



Architecture

High level architecture diagram







SO Jakarta component view

Refactoring modules 

Platform Maturity

Please fill out the centralized wiki page: Jakarta Release Platform Maturity 

  • Third Party Products Dependencies

Third Party Products mean products that are mandatory to provide services for your components. Development of new functionality in third party product may or not be expected.
List the Third Party Products (OpenStack, ODL, RabbitMQ, Elastic Search, Crystal Reports, ...).

Name

Description

Name

Description

Camunda 

Dependency on the camunda engine for processing the workflows

MariaDb

Used for all the dependencies on the persistency.

  • TESTING AND INTEGRATION PLANS

Provide a description of the testing activities (unit test, functional test, automation,...) that will be performed by the team within the scope of this release.

Describe the plan to integrate and test the release deliverables within the overall ONAP system.
Confirm that resources have been allocated to perform such activities.

  • validate uses cases and pairwise testing of SO with other components

  • enhance CSIT to include more tests

  • GAPS

This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.

Gaps identified

Impact

Gaps identified

Impact

To fill out

To fill out

  • KNOWN DEFECTS AND ISSUES

Please refer to release notes of Guilin release – To be updated when avail

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution
Loading...
Refresh

Please update any risk on the centralized wiki page - Jakarta Risks

Resources

Please see the INFO.yaml files associated with each repo as the authoritative sources of information - https://gerrit.onap.org/r/admin/repos/q/filter:so

Release Milestone

The milestones are defined at the Release Planning: Jakarata and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.



Documentation, Training

Please update the following centralized wiki: Jakarta Documentation

That includes

  • Team contributions to the specific document related to he project (Config guide, installation guide...).

  • Team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset

  • High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.

  • Documentation includes items such as:

    • Installation instructions

    • Configuration instructions

    • Developer guide

    • End User guide

    • Admin guide

    • ...

Note

The Documentation project will provide the Documentation Tool Chain to edit, configure, store and publish all Documentation asset.


Other Information

  • Vendor Neutral

If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.

  • Free and Open Source Software

FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.

Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.



Charter Compliance

The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.