Istanbul: Lessons Learned
Description | Documented by | Comments / Follow-up | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cannot complete arch reviews by M2. Should we increase the time between M1 and M2? Some other solution? | @David McBride | Can we start arch reviews earlier? Limited by sign off for previous release. Can we increase cadence of arch SC meetings for review period? Have additional meetings in other time zones? |
2 | Disconnect between arch reviews and release management processes. Example: DMAAP-1615 | @David McBride | Improve communication between arch SC, RM, and PTLs |
3 | Verify that release name string is updated in documentation (i.e., “honolulu” release documentation showed release as “guilin”) | @Thomas Kulik | Add to existing release management task. |
4 | New task for M2: PTLs complete color-coding of view-per-component GR requirements by M2 in order to highlight resource issues, or other problems, as early as possible. | @cl664y@att.com | Implemented for Jakarta |
5 | Remove OOM tasks from M3 and move them to M4, since OOM activities trail project code review activities. | @Sylvain Desbureaux | Tasks moved for OOM for Jakarta |
6 | Testing task should happen after container delivery. Move to RC? (Toine) | @Toine Siebelink | David to review release management tasks and update timing between container delivery and testing as necessary. |
7 | Jira cleanup for projects should move to Sign Off | @Dan Timoney | David to review release management tasks and update timing between container delivery and testing as necessary. |
8 | Need to resolve ongoing issues with unmaintained projects: simple bug fixes; publication of documentation, etc. | @Amy Zwarico | Ongoing dedicated meeting on Mondays to address these issues. |
9 | Problem at the front of the release with release management tasks for requirements owners. Since requirements submission doesn’t end before M1, it’s possible for new requirements to be added AFTER the release management tasks have been added. Difficult to track without a lot of manual effort. | @David McBride | RM to monitor requirements added to the release through M2 and update release management tasks accordingly. Could requirement owners send notification to the requirements SC mailing list? Cutoff at M2 prevents project teams from evaluating support. |
10 | @Thomas Kulik | ||
11 | Begin X-testing on release branch as soon as the branch is available | @David McBride | PTL transition issue. Unlikely to be a problem going forward. |
12 | Get legal assessment on release no later than M3 | @Kenny Paul | Will file support ticket with legal team immediately following M2. |