R9 E2E Network Slicing use case

R9 E2E Network Slicing use case

 

Use Case Overview & Description

This use case intends to demonstrate the modeling, orchestration, assurance and optimization of end-to-end network slices, including RAN, Transport and Core slice sub-nets. This use case shall support different deployment scenarios of the Slice Management & Orchestration functions through a modular architecture and standards-based interfaces.

Use Case Key Information

TOPIC

DESCRIPTION

WIKI PAGE

Requirements Proposal

This is a link to the requirements proposal made on the Requirements Sub-committee

Architecture S/C info

Information on the Architecture sub-committee presentation

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/ONAPARC-703

Presentation: 

Prior Project "Base" Wiki

Link to the Honolulu release page for this use case

R8 E2E Network Slicing use case

Requirements Jira (REQ-###) Ticket

Link to the REQ Jira ticket for this use case

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/REQ-721

Key Use Case Leads & Contacts

USE CASE LEADS @LIN MENG@Saravanan Ayyadurai @Ratna Shanker Mishra

USE CASE KEY CONTACTS@LIN MENG@Saravanan Ayyadurai @Ratna Shanker Mishra , @Henry Yu@Milind Jalwadi (Unlicensed) @Borislav Glozman

 

Meetings Register & Recordings

Link to Use Case Team meetings

BUSINESS DRIVER

Executive Summary: 5G Network Slicing is one of the key features of 5G. The essence of Network Slicing is in sharing network resources (PNFs, VNFs, CNFs) while satisfying widely varying and sometimes seemingly contradictory requirements to different customers in an optimal manner. Same network is expected to provide different Quality of Experience to different consumers, use case categories and industry verticals including factory automation, connected home, autonomous vehicles, smart cities, remote healthcare, in-stadium experience and rural broadband. An End-to-End Network Slice consists of RAN, Transport and Core network slice sub-nets. This Use Case intends to demonstrate the modeling, orchestration and assurance of a simple network slice (e.g. eMBB). While 3GPP standards are evolving and 5G RAN and core are being realized, this Use Case will start with realizing an E2E Network Slice with a simple example of a 5G RAN, Core and Transport Network Slice sub-nets. It will also align with relevant standard bodies (e.g., 3GPP, ETSI, TM Forum) as well as other open initiatives such as O-RAN where relevant, w.r.to both interfaces as well as the functional aspects.

Business Impact: Network Slicing is a feature that almost every service provider will leverage. It allows a service provider to improve their network efficiency by maximizing the network throughput more tailored to each user's use of the network. It is seen as an imperative for efficient and optimal use of their network. This will be particularly relevant as 5G is expected to have upwards of 10,000x the traffic load over 4G and 20GB peak data rates.

Business Markets: Network Slicing, for this use case, is specifically aimed at a 5G access, core and transport. In the future, this might be extended to other domains or applications such as fixed-wireless convergence, Wi-Fi access, all aspects of transport including fronthaul, or unified network management orchestration. Network Slicing functionality is what almost every wireless service provider will inevitably find valuable. The concepts and modeling work being done for Network Slicing will find applications in other areas as well. (Industries) Some applications and industries such as smart cities, remote maintenance, video streaming vs life-saving first-responder type applications will demand different requirements from Network slicing. (Markets/Regions) There are no regional specific aspects to Network Slicing.

Funding/Financial Impacts: Network slicing engenders the optimal use of resources for a Network. Thus, this represents OPEX savings for a service provider.

Organization Mgmt, Sales Strategies: There is no additional organizational management or sales strategies for this use case outside of a service providers "normal" ONAP deployment and its attendant organizational resources from a service provider.

Development Status

PROJECT

PTL

User Story / Epic

Requirement

A&AI

@REEHIL, WILLIAM E

 

No impact

AAF

@Jonathan Gathman

 

No impact

APPC

@Takamune Cho

 

No impact

CLAMP

@Gervais-Martial Ngueko

 

No impact

CC-SDK

@Dan Timoney

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/CCSDK-3297

Interface to CPS, RAN configuration & A1 interface

DCAE

@Vijay Kumar

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/DCAEGEN2-2771

Enhancements in Slice Analysis MS, and KPI Computation MS (Stretch goal)

DMaaP

@Fiachra Corcoran

 

No impact

External API

@Adrian OSullivan

 

No impact

HOLMES

@Guangrong Fu

 

No impact

MODELING

@Hui Deng

 

No impact, CPS related modeling aspects will be covered by CPS project

Multi-VIM /

Cloud

@Bin Yang

 

No impact

OOF

@krishna moorthy

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/OPTFRA-954

 

OOM

@Sylvain Desbureaux

 

No impact

POLICY

@James Hahn

 

No impact

PORTAL

@Sunder Tattavarada

 

No impact

SDN-C

@Dan Timoney

 

No impact

SDC

@ChrisC

 

No impact

SO

@Seshu Kumar Mudiganti

https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/browse/SO-3649

Minor enhancements, some major enhancements are stretch goals

VID

@Ikram Ikramullah

 

No impact

VF-C

@Yuanhong Deng

 

No impact

VNFRQTS

@Steven wright

 

No impact

VNF-SDK

@Former user (Deleted)

 

No impact

CDS

@Yuriy Malakov

 

No impact

CPS

@Toine Siebelink

 

Models, and interface to store/retrieve use case related data

List of PTLs:Approved Projects

*Each Requirement should be tracked by its own User Story in JIRA 

USE CASE DIAGRAM

Use cases define how different users interact with a system under design.  Each use case represents an action that may be performed by a user (defined in UML as an Actor with a user persona).

Use Case Functional Definitions

Use Case Title

Title of the Use Case

Actors (and System Components)

The list of Actors and System Components that participate in the Use Case

Description

Short overview of the Use Case

Points of Contact

Authors and maintainers of the Use Case.

Use Case Lead, Key Use Case members and code contributors.

Preconditions

A list of conditions that are assumed to be true before the Use Case is invoked

Includes description of Information Consumed

Triggers / Begins when

Describes the trigger for beginning the Use Case

Steps / Flows (success)

Describes the sequence of steps and interactions that occur during the Use Case (may include: description, data exchanges, functionality, state changes)

Interaction diagrams may be included or referenced

Post-conditions

The expected results of the execution of the Use Case

Includes description of Information Produced

Alternate / Exception Paths

Description of any exceptions or special process that could occur during Use Case

Related Use Cases

List of the Use Cases referenced by this Use Case

Assumptions

Describes any assumptions that are made for this use case

Tools / References / Artifacts

List of any tools or reference material associated with this Use Case as well as any JIRA trace-ability.

List of any associated diagrams or modelling artifacts associated with the Use Case

TESTING

Current Status

  1. Testing Blockers

  2. High visibility bugs

  3. Other issues for testing that should be seen at a summary level

  4. Where possible, always include JIRA links

 

End to End flow to be Tested

**This should be a summary level Sequence diagram done in Gliffy** 

 

Gliffy Diagram is only supported by the cloud editor

Because Forge macros arent supported by the legacy editor, you'll need to convert this content to the cloud editor to display this macro properly. Find out more about converting to the cloud editor

 

Test Cases and Status

 

1

There should be a test case for each item in the sequence diagram

NOT YET TESTED

2

create additional requirements as needed for each discreet step

COMPLETE

3

Test cases should cover entire Use Case

PARTIALLY COMPLETE

 

Supporting Files

Date

Description

File

Mar 29, 2021

Presentation given to Requirements Sub-Committee