2021-01-06 AAI Meeting Notes

Attachments (including meeting recording):



Attendees:  

@William Reehil

@Venkata Harish Kajur

@Mohammad

@Shirley Morgan

Agenda Items:

Guilin Maintenance Release

Honolulu Timeframe



Status

OPEN

IN PROGRESS

ON HOLD

DONE

CANCELLED

Status

OPEN

IN PROGRESS

ON HOLD

DONE

CANCELLED

START RECORDING

1



Honolulu requirements



OPEN



2



Requirements for inclusion of GraphGraph in Honolulu release



OPEN

List goes here

Open Jira tickets as tasks for H release

AAI-2910: Add graphgraph sonar job to ci-managementClosed

AAI-2911: Add graphgraph CLM job to ci-managementClosed

AAI-2912: Release a valid graphgraph artifactOpen

AAI-2913: Add GraphGraph to OOMClosed

AAI-2713: Sonar coverage report for graphgraph shows up but showing 0% coverageClosed 

3



Security Requirements for pods

@James Forsyth



REQ-215: Containers configured per secure recommendationTo Do

4



Brownfield / deployed / embedded inventory systems and AAI

Fred from Verizon

OPEN

How do we accelerate migration using A&AI and the RunTime DB solution

Proposed a topic to be explored by AI&I and other ONAP WGs.

High impact, common interest among most CSPs 

   

Status Quo:

Most operators have multiple, siloed, possibly overlapping topology and inventory (domain specific) databases

Goal is to integrate ALL Inventory, and Topology databases into a Unified AI&I Architecture modeled DB which would contain ALL VNFs (VMs/Containers), PNFs, plus support easy expansion for future Inventory & Topology constructs/technologies.  

May take considerable time/investment (both are short).

 

Targeted Objectives

  • Fast integration/consolidation time

  • Minimize impact to business systems during migration

  • Reduce throw away code

  • Reduce throw away integration work

  • Improve Service/Resource LCM & SA, especially for 5G

 

How to accelerate the migration to Unified Database?

  • Phased Externalization of key PNF/VNF/CNF attributes currently stored in multiple inventory and topology silos.

  • Simplify the eventual consolidation of Inventory and Topology DBs using proposed automation tools and advanced discovery capabilities supporting the above

  • Leverage AI&I and possibly the ONAP Runtime Config DB and other ONAP WGs to help solve the problem

  • Proposed topic can be explored by the AI&I and other ONAP WGs.

  • Need to expand this preliminary list

5



Papyrus Enhancements



OPEN

Papyrus modeling (reverse engineering) @Jacqueline Beaulac [Ericsson] 

AAI Information Model Reverse Engineering Meeting 

https://jira.onap.org/browse/AAI-2441
Need attribute descriptions story for graphgraph, any other requirements?

Is there an automated publishing mechanism we should look into?

@Kamel Idir has v20 & v21 reverse engineered model representations - 

AAI Swagger v20 UML

AAI Swagger v21 UML

6



AAI Bugs

@James Forsyth

IN PROGRESS

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution fixversions
Loading...
Refresh

7



Performance Issue

@James Forsyth

OPEN

@FREEMAN, BRIAN D reported that when there are ~2400 vservers returned in a closed loop custom query, AAI takes minutes to respond.  We've discussed paging previously, any other ways to optimize this?

PUT 'https://aai.onap:8443/aai/v16/query?format=resource'



{"query":"query/closed-loop","start":"/cloud-infrastructure/cloud-regions/cloud-region/CloudOwner/RegionOne/tenants/tenant/28481f6939614cfd83e6767a0e039bcc/vservers/vserver/6ad9eb6b-d7fc-46d6-8617-4c9b46e7308b"}

8



New UI Features / Historical Tracking

@William Reehil

@Manisha Aggarwal

OPEN

The AT&T team has done an exciting POC at a sprint-a-thon event that they would like to share with the community.

ATT wants to contribute additional UI views to ONAP, want to discuss path forward



Link for self repo creation: https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/wiki/display/DW/Self+Repo+Creation+via+INFO.yaml

William/Jimmy will look into this for creating the new sparky extensions repository

Open Action Items

New Action items