5G Use Case Meeting notes for Apr 30, 2020
Meeting Time (Mar-Oct 11AM GMT 3PM)
Attendees
- Benjamin Cheung
- Vimal Begwani
- Zu Qiang
- SALVATORE RICCI
- Marge Hillis
- Xuan Thuy Dang
- Bob Papa
- Joanne Liu Rudel
- -
Discussion items
Item | Who | Notes | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Discussion this week |
| |||||||||
Release 7 GuiLin Release | All in 5G U/C team | R7 GuiLin Requirements & Proposals - TIMELINES: R7 GuiLin Release M0 - April 22/23 (may shift due R6) Requirements S/C page: Requirements subcommittee R7 new requirements, currently proposals in R7: Guilin release - functional requirements proposed list Take a R7 - example page. PNF & 5G USE CASES/REQUIREMENTS: Guilin release - functional requirements proposed list#E2ENetworkSlicing ORAN-ONAP Harmonization Use Case (needs Placeholder) - Needs 3GPP approval (April/May) → Sync Marge & Vimal → pending meeting to add R7 req proposal. → new specification from ORAN CMPv2 work → Proposal to be presented PNF Plug and Play → Added Req Proposal will be presented PNF Onboarding / Pre-onboarding → Added proposal → present on 5G Service Modeling (Modeling) → Continue modeling work → present Licensing Management (Modeling/Arch) → R7 need to plan contribution. 5G Bulk PM / RT PM / PM Dictionary → R7 align to 3GPP specification RT PM meta-data, changes to collector. PM Control Data Extension 5G FM - (1) 3GPP standards & VES , (2) A1 Adaptor Extensions→ R7 possible FM updates. 5G NRM
| ||||||||
R6 Frankfurt M4 / RC0 Deadline Deliverables | All in 5G U/C | RC0-2 for R6 Deliverables R6 Frankfurt Release: Frankfurt Milestone Status Release Planning Page: Release Planning M1 Deliverables Checklist: Deliverables for Planning Milestone Checklist Template Deliverables by Milestone: Frankfurt Deliverables by Milestone M4 Deliverables:
(CONTINUOUS) - DOCUMENTATION - Documentation (Read the Docs) - M1 - M4
"Are you referring to MS1 and the preliminary documentation? https://lf-onap.atlassian.net/wiki/display/DW/Frankfurt+Documentation This is mainly relevant to new projects. The link that you provided below covers that, since the 5G use case team is not a new project, your documentation is already published on RTD." - Gerrit Files, Gerrit Review, Main Branch, Update file, create Gerrit Review, RC0 RC1 RC2 Project Team focused its effort on:
| ||||||||
CONFERENCES & DEMOS | All in 5G U/C | CONFERENCE PLUGFEST
CONFERENCES April 20-21 Open Network & Edge Summit (ONES) - Los Angeles - GuiLin R7 (Planning).
April 21-23 https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/display/LN/2020+April+Virtual+Technical+Event Virtual Technical Event Early June DDF - (GuiLin R7) ACTION: Will remote presentations be possible, links to remotely attend? When is final schedule up. | ||||||||
Configuration & Persistency Service | Architecture S/C presentation for Run Time DB.
Team is working to define the Proposal (see wiki). Then it will be presented at the Arch S/C and then TSC. Sync with Sandeep - will meet with Sandeep Fri 7 2020. Ted Johnson. Existing interface. For R6, will be part of CC-SDK. Met with Yuriy Malakov & Dan Timoney . CONFIGURATION & PERSISTENCY SERVICE not a separate component in R6. CMNotify - The DCAE, CMNotify VES event (proper) are pushed to R7
Feb 3-7 Nokia has confirmed that Step 2/3/4 is in R7 due to VES review. Meeting setup with Sandeep - R7 planning. Need to make a presentation for Alla's call: ONAP Use Case / Requirements Teams Process Way of Working (WoW) R7 - Decide if we can to be a separate component. need to find a PTL lead. Automation tool integration. Schema details. Q#1 (Seshu) RunTime Catalog in CCSDK vs DPS - they are different & have different purposes. Reuse of existing database. Q#2 questions controller have config data why isn't that sufficient why can't we store this in A&AI. "Source of truth" - controller would be allowed to change / update info for Configdata others Read. Catalog/ model driven Use Case onboarding package, SO not impacted. Q#3 - why don't we have this as part of A&AI in Eric Debeau - storing not just inventory, but configuration information and additional information. multiple persona a common data is more elegant than each controller having its own database. 35 databases in ONAP. Q#4 - structured database / justify the technology selected for this work. Q#5 - Roadmap of functionality Q#6 - scalability / performance need queries are not complicated & volume of information will not be as high performance - performance
| |||||||||
Network Slicing R6 Proposal | Update on slicing proposal. SO/Seshu presented. Multiple functional requirements/Use Cases. Recursive orchestration of nested services. Didn't want independent W/F for flows but try to leverage/reuse work. Presented the End to End U/C with macro-view for E2E slice. and components impacted. Right now impact will be on SO, OOF, Policy, SDC and AAI. What controller will be used for managing slices? Focusing on design aspects and instantiation and activation. Put up logical E2E slice. Target simple VNFs. Focus to create VNF vs reconfiguring a VNF? Slice segments are going to be both dedicated/shared. Started with discovering existing resources; assume segments created with VNF/PNFs in inventory & discoverable. Spinup new slice instances. :
Presentation/slides at: NETWORK SLICING PoC in R6 Frankfurt (Obsolete) - Development is proceeding. Start R7 release in next couple of weeks. Next week there will be presentation on requirements for R7. R4 in 3GPP 28.541 - implemented as part properties of a service. didn't create separate TOSCA type for sliceprofile. Plan to introduce new serivce for serivce & slice profile properties in 3GPP those are recent doc updated in january. introduced many new properties from GSP. You've modeling team presentations were made, platform updated w/ network slicing.
| |||||||||
ORAN/3GPP ONAP Harmonization U/C | Trying to settle on scope of the Use Case. List of many possible contributions that will take more than one release to complete. Impacts for items to be added to wiki (analysis). Prioritize the work items what we could propose to accomplish. CM Notify as a new domain has been accepted on the DCAE S/C today Oct 24 2019. Dongho Kim will be creating the test/integration page. - A1 & O1 test integration pages have been added & links. DongHo Kim leading the Integration Sandeep code was merged w/ SDN-C branch. Current container has the latest code. Continuing to test. In AT&T lab now being tested
| |||||||||
OOF SON PCI | N.K. Shankaranarayanan | From SDN-R when we send config change align to NetConf Yang model avail. whatever yang model used, want config DB schema to be aligned w/ yang model to keep model driven. wanted Yang Models from ORAN if possible. In license catch-22. Some yang models for RAN on ORAN website due to licensing issues from Martin Skorupski took 3GPP model converted to files to compile. Issue w/ ORAN getting ok from 3GPP that it is a valid rep of 3GPP model. Option (1) use previous yang model, or (2) switch to ORAN model if available immediately. yang to SQL schema. Only need some parts of the model for SON project. Currently MariaDB continue to use. Piotr, Marek, et al. If there are useful file wo/ IPR issues, should be a way to use interim files. | ||||||||
WoW w/ Model & Arch | Way of Working between Architecture , Modeling Subcommittee & Use Case Teams and what happens and touch-points at M0/M1/M2/M3. Modeling Way of Working / Process: Proposed ONAP Release Process Updates for Information and Data Modeling Use Case Way of Working / Process Use Case WoW Process: ONAP Use Case / Requirements Teams Process Way of Working (WoW) | |||||||||
Use Case Template | Use Case Template - Ben talked w/ Andy Mayer U/CR call Oct 23. He said he is preparing the page, and would present here at the 5G U/C S/C call. REQUIREMENTS SUBCOMMITTEE - requirements sub-group / not bring use cases any more, refer to them as requirements. / proposed change talk less about architecture in requirements mtgs & reviews. more clear split between req & arch discussion. / Alla Goldberg changed U/C S/C to Requirements S/C. Security and ctl loop req will be discussed in those S/C; other things should go to Req S/C. Monday - - what input for Req review; should not go into realization aspects should be moved out of req review. What type of info & how much info at M0. when just reviewing proposed req. Andy has said Proposed Functional Template for Use Cases this is ready to go live.
| |||||||||
PM Dictionary, 5G NRM | 5G U/C teams | |||||||||
PNF Pre-onboarding/ onboarding | PNF U/C teams | R7 - Per artifact package security for the onboarding package. ETSI SOL004. Verified in VNF-SDK/VVP R7 - dynamic schemas updates to the RTCfgDB with Yang model files. | ||||||||
PNF / SW Upgrade | Zu Qiang | Reviewed with SO team. Preparing for DDF. will discuss with Change Management team, might be presenting. R6 in progress. Should be able to update/merge all Jiras by M4. No big risk. Integration RC0-RC2 | ||||||||
5G/ Bulk PM | Preparing presentations at DDF in Prague in DDF for R6 BulkPM functionality in Jan 2020. R7 - Bulk PM | |||||||||
PNF / NetConf | Oskar Malm | Basic U/C unchanged, support for NetConf over TLS. What is being worked on in R6 is to have a improved functionality around certificate handling. When you have a TLS 1.x for authentication for ONAP so the NF when it connects to ONAP it is a valid xNF. Authenticate user cert ONAP needs to get the certs from somewhere - a centralized solution w/ AAF. and connect to ext. PKI via CMPv2. ONAP component minimum version TLS 1.2. Dependency to REQ-140 (CMPv2); Controller-side NetConf over TLS REQ-76. | ||||||||
PNF / Plug and Play | Benjamin Cheung | held meeting for discussing Civic Address elements & Geolocation information w/ the modeling S/C PnP - PNFD/SDC AID/AAI Schema Modeling - Discussion Jan 2, 2020 Eventually will the PNFregistration VES event for PnP (R7). SO presentations related to Building block definitions. Dependency to REQ-140. Option #2 new arch. is agreed. Option #1 continue w/ old. Use Case Realization Call: February 19, 2020
| ||||||||
5G Service Modeling U/C | WIKI: 5G RAN SERVICE MODELING & DEFINITION in R6 Frankfurt CDS Data dictionary - Define attribute, in that entry tells you how to get that value. Yuriy Malakov If you needed the IP@ you can go that entry → points to the REST call. Used for instantiation and configuration management. Model driven ONAP. Modeling Concepts 3GPP TS28.541/TS28.540 - 5G NRM Network Resource Model analysis (spreadsheet). Looking parameters introduce Classify parameters - CDS Data Dictionary, A&AI, RunTime Cfg DB. Presentations - Modeling S/C, U/C S/C, U/C Realization, 5G U/C. Modeling S/C - Experimental info model introduced (standards driven) A&AI - classification of A&AI parameters. Commission (might need at installation & commissioning) → A&AI. Onboarding - Onboarding, PNF PNFregistration, CMNotify (VES events), Pre-defined "load 3GPP model" Information Flows - Where these might be used. ORAN Standards - Usage of the 3GPP TS28.541 in ORAN Standards. Might want to consider which 3GPP parameters ORAN cares about & when. They might an opinion of when to incorporate parameters. Presentation at Use Case Realization call Use Case Realization Call: January 29, 2020 - next step to present to Modeling S/C. | |||||||||
CMPv2 Security (AAF enhancements) | Hampus Tjader | M2/M3 CMPv2 & AAF status - CMPv2 GREEN at M2/M3 right now. - REQ-140Getting issue details... STATUS have committers now. AAF S/W. CMPv2 protocol.
|
SUPPORTING SLIDES
Document | File |
---|---|
Arch Req | |
RECORDING
Recording | File |
---|---|
MP4 (Video + Audio) | |
Audio Only | |
M3U, Chat |