VES Working Session | 2020-03-30
Attendees
- VNFRQTS-869Getting issue details... STATUS damian.nowak
@Oskar Malm
Agenda & Minutes
- Determine process for issues to be worked. Potential proposal below:
- Proposed Process Reviewed and Revised on the call:
- New items submitted via ONAP JIRA
- Submitter can self-assign or leave unassigned (NOTE: if unassigned ownership will be discussed at the weekly meeting)
- If needed, use weekly meeting to align on issues, gaps, and approach
- All final language should be submitted as a Gerrit review (not in the JIRA ticket)
- Standard set of reviewers for all VES related changes
- Rules for merging changes:
- No change will be merged if there is a -1 from any mandatory review
- Merging will required approval from the VNFRQTS PTL and at least 1 person from 2 companies has approved
- All reviews will be open for a minimum 5 working days before being merged.
- Any Gerrit review flagged with a -1 will be reviewed on the weekly unless resolved offline prior to the call
- Proposed Process Reviewed and Revised on the call:
- Review current open issues
- Assign owners
- If possible, determine initial tasks for ONAP Guilin release
Action Items/Decisions:
- Determined process for VES events. See above
- VNFRQTS-869 - Will be worked in 7.1.1 update (make eventName requirements for camel case to SHOULD instead of MUST) - Owner: Trevor Lovett
- VNFRQTS-844 - Vijay clarified handling of batch events (see comments). This ticket will be worked in Guilin release, but the specifics are depdent on a specific feature proposed in Guilin. Awaiting confirmation - Owner: Vijay Kumar
- VNFRQTS-842 - Damian will take this issue to 3GPP Harmonization meetings for direction Owner: damian.nowak
- VNFRQTS-813 - Trevor will take a first stab at proposals for rationalizing VNF Reqt's and VES Spec Owner: Trevor Lovett
- VNFRQTS-843 - Trevor will devise a proposal for publishing VES schemas to Nexus/Maven for consumption by DCAE
- VNFRQTS-812 - Vijay will review current monitoring and management requirements to determine if any don't align with current DCAE implementation
- 3GPP Alignment Timeline
- Planned for G (7.2 or 8.0)
- Goal is for it to backwards compatible, but that is not confirmed. If backwards compatible, this will by 7.2 otherwise 8.X
- Next step it so review this with the ONAP Requirements subcommittee (Marge Hill has shared a draft presentation. Additional reviews this week. Requirements review planned in next 2 weeks)
- All impacts to the event listener spec related to this alignment will worked through this meeting series
Attachments