/
Tooling & best practices dealing with ONAP supervizion

Tooling & best practices dealing with ONAP supervizion

Apr 12, 2020

Currently the administration guide of ONAP is poor, it could make sense to plan an update of the documentation in the future.

This page is to collect the tooling & best practices dealing with ONAP supervizion from an admin perspective in a production or pre-production context from  each lab。

 

We  thought of the following questions, if you have other better suggestions or experience, welcome feedback。

  1.  Which tools are used: Nagios, Prometheus, Zabbix, Consul, proprietary third party tooling,...?

  2. What is your feedback on the tools?

  3. how do you manage Infra versus ONAP versus VNF supervizion

  4. Do you use a ligther tools to check the end points for the ONAP end users?

 

 

China Mobile Lab ( @LUKAI @Yan Yang)

  •  Which tools are used: Nagios, Prometheus, Zabbix, Consul, proprietary third party tooling,...?    We actively use Zabbix for monitoring

  • What is your feedback on the tools?

           we use Zabbix monitors the CPU, memory, and disk information of k8s nodes mainly by triggering alarm and sending messages by emails or others ways when a montior thereshold is exceed to users who is maintaining the env, and help uses to solve the problems.

  • how do you manage Infra versus ONAP versus VNF supervizion?Not considered yet.

  • Do you use a ligther tools to check the end points for the ONAP end users?

          Not considered yet.

Orange OpenLab (@Morgan Richomme @Eric Debeau)

  •  Which tools are used: Nagios, Prometheus, Zabbix, Consul, proprietary third party tooling,...?

 

  • What is your feedback on the tools?

 

 

  • Do you use a ligther tools to check the end points for the ONAP end users?

 

ONAP Integration/Windriver Lab(@Stephen Gooch )

 

  •  Which tools are used: Nagios, Prometheus, Zabbix, Consul, proprietary third party tooling,...?

 

  • What is your feedback on the tools?

 

  • how do you manage Infra versus ONAP versus VNF supervizion?

 

  • Do you use a ligther tools to check the end points for the ONAP end users?

China Telecom  Lab( Yi Yang (yangyi.bri@chinatelecom.cn), Luman Wang (wanglm.bri@chinatelecom.cn))

 

  •  Which tools are used: Nagios, Prometheus, Zabbix, Consul, proprietary third party tooling,...?

 

  • What is your feedback on the tools?

 

  • how do you manage Infra versus ONAP versus VNF supervizion?

 

  • Do you use a ligther tools to check the end points for the ONAP end users?

 

TLAB(@Rich Bennett ,John Murray (JM2932@att.com) )

 

  •  Which tools are used: Nagios, Prometheus, Zabbix, Consul, proprietary third party tooling,...?

 

  • What is your feedback on the tools?

 

  • how do you manage Infra versus ONAP versus VNF supervizion?

 

  • Do you use a ligther tools to check the end points for the ONAP end users?

 

WINLAB(@Tracy Van Brakle ,Ivan Seskar (seskar@winlab.rutgers.edu))

 

  •  Which tools are used: Nagios, Prometheus, Zabbix, Consul, proprietary third party tooling,...?

 

  • What is your feedback on the tools?

 

  • how do you manage Infra versus ONAP versus VNF supervizion?

 

  • Do you use a ligther tools to check the end points for the ONAP end users?

 

Auto Lab(Paul Vaduva (paul.vaduva@enea.com))