2019-12-18 [ExtAPI] Meeting notes

Date

Dec 18, 2019 at 15:00 UTC

Note time is 15:00 GMT = UTC now

Meeting Link: https://zoom.us/j/719188490

Recording: zoom_0.mp4
- Chat Log:
M1 planning Scope : EXTAPI R6 - M1 Release Planning
@Andy Mayer discussion around new ONAP Swagger Guideline Proposed OpenAPI 2.0 / Swagger Style Guide @Adrian OSullivan and @Andy Mayer to work on example, Adrian started on Service Catalog https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/externalapi/nbi/+/99755
Performance Mgmt @Gautam Kumar potential APIs TMF 628, 649, 657
macromode service instantiation @Former user (Deleted)
https self signed certificate @Matthieu Geerebaertistio provide loadbalancing - updates oom - not Frankfurt, for Guilin.
@Colin Hutchinson to present Kong to Architecture subcommittee, how Gateway fits it with architecture. @chaker Al-Hakim

last week reminder:

discussion around support for macro mode Service instantiation with @Former user (Deleted)who has offered to work on EXTAPI-258. This Jira will be broken up into 3 tasks, with a parent Story. Plan to draft high level design/ppt on macro mode csar, Service Order and associated SO calls.
- Related Jiras are EXTAPI-369: Passing Instance params for SO Macro request Closed, EXTAPI-368: Preparing the request payload (action = add) for calling SO macro flowClosed, EXTAPI-367: Identify whether the Service is of A-la-carte or macro typeClosed
Discussion around java 11 compile enforcement with @Matthieu Geerebaertwho will check with brian freeman on INT-1352 and its impacts for External API. Matthieu working on EXTAPI-370: Java 11 & oparent 3.0.0-SNAPSHOTClosed
Note NBI moving to use common mariadb galera cluster EXTAPI-348: Use common mariadb galera clusterClosed
Second discussion ( on our second call ) with Emanuelle Sarris and @Johanne Mayer around ODM, and its possible inclusion in Frankfurt pending resources. Also discussion on Performance Mgmt in terms of API specifications applicable for ONAP , TMF 628 / 657, ETSI SOL 005 PM Mgmt ,..... @Adrian OSullivan look at high level comparison of TMF 628 & ETSI SOL 005 and show next meeting. Maybe modelling impact @Andy Mayer

Next week:

Examine TM Forum specs such as TMF 641 v18.5 (e.g., added service type) Should we group services to service type?

Last week: