Logging Dublin M2 Deliverables for Functionality Freeze Milestone Checklist
- Michael O'Brien
- cl664y@att.com
DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR COMMENTS
The following items are expected to be completed for the project to Pass the M2 Functionality Freeze Milestone.
M2 Release Functionality Freeze Milestone definition.
In the middle of a CMR merge to align with integration in https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/78882/
back on this patch in a couple hours
| Practice Area | Checkpoint | Yes/No | Evidence - Comment | How to? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product Management | Are all provisional APIs interface (stub) been defined (at beta-quality level)? | Yes | ONAP Application Logging Specification v1.2 (Casablanca)#DeveloperGuide tick/tock cycle (c implemented in e, d implemented in e) | |
| Is there a final list of externally consumable APIs available? | Yes | SLF4J jar - see pom.xml in ONAP Application Logging Specification v1.2 (Casablanca)#pom.xml | ||
For all completed Sprints, have Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Done" in Jira? | Yes | Log board https://jira.onap.org/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=143 backlog | Difference between a Product and Sprint Backlog | |
Are all tasks associated with the completed Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Done" in Jira? | Yes | backlog | ||
| If applicable to your project, has your team been able to clear the project' blockers? If not provide status on the plan to close the blocker(s). | yes | Dublin Risks #4 | Link to blockers. | |
| What new features or changes to existing features in this project scope need to be communicated to VNF Providers? List the changes in the Evidence tab. | N/A | |||
| If yes to the previous question, have these been communicated to the VNF Requirements project? | N/A | |||
| Release Management | Have all source code files been updated with License Apache 2 header? | yes | Specific rules and instruction are available in ONAP wiki. | |
| Has the year format in copyright header of all source code files been updated? (Rules for new files created in 2019 and existing files modified in 2019 are different) | Yes | checked all projects in eclipse for 2018, new changes say 2019 | Guidance on year format | |
| In case source code can't be edited, has a "License.txt" file been placed at the root directory for which the license is applicable? | N/A | all source can be edited | Guidance for source code file that can't be edited | |
| (a) Has the Project Team added appropriate license and copyright notices to all ONAP source code and documentation files, where possible for the particular file format? | Yes | |||
| (b) Has the Project Team reviewed and understood the most recent license scan reports from the LF, for both (a) licenses within the codebase and (b) licenses for third-party build time dependencies? | Yes | |||
| For both (a) and (b) questions, have all high priority non-Project Licenses been either removed, planned for removal before code freeze, or escalated as likely exception requests? | Yes | |||
Have all API projects dependencies been captured? | Yes | Provide link to the "API Incoming Dependency" section within your project M1 Release Planning deliverable. | The source of information for the API dependency is the "API Incoming Dependency" of the M1 Release Planning deliverable. Please update the source accordingly, and let The Release Manager aware of the changes. | |
| Development | For new projects approved for this release, have all defined repositories source code been placed into Gerrit? | Yes | Provide link to evidence | For evidences, provide link(s) to Gerrit repos by providing the URL as shown in this example |
| Has the project team reach the Automated Unit Test Code Coverage expectation? (Refer to artifacts available in Sonar) | Yes | Goal: 55% for Incubation project in Beijing Actual: 84.8 as of 20190220 (down from 88.8) https://sonar.onap.org/dashboard?id=org.onap.logging-analytics%3Alogging-analytics 84.8% POMBA = 79.2 https://sonar.onap.org/dashboard?id=org.onap.logging-analytics.pomba%3Apomba-audit-common | ||
| Is there any binaries (jar, war, tar, gz, gzip, zip files) in Gerrit project repository? | No | Addressed draft review containing a zip in https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/57083/2 we discussed the zip issue some more - (zip files not allowed in git), we decided that since SDC works with tosca zip files then to fully test our interaction with SDC we need to be able to have zip files available to the testing framework - changing this review off -1 for zip submission Note: we should document this decision for the future when an audit of the code is done - I will send a mail to onap-discuss but it would be good if the javadoc of the testcase explained this zip requirement so we can link to git from the review, jira and release review LOG-522 - Getting issue details... STATUS https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/57083/3/src/test/resources/toscaModel.csar.zip,unified | Refer to CI Development Best Practices | |
| Could you ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, company name, etc. have been removed? All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols. | Yes | Addressed draft review containing an AT&T logo in https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/57211/1 | ||
| Is there any pending commit request older than 36 business hours in Gerrit? | Yes | https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/q/status:open+logging | ||
| Have all the Jenkins jobs successfully passed (Merge-Jobs)? | Yes | Provide link as evidence to Jenkins project tab https://jenkins.onap.org/view/logging-analytics/ | ||
| Are all snapshot binaries available in Nexus? | Yes | Provide link to evidence in Nexus project folder 1.2.2 https://nexus.onap.org/service/local/repositories/snapshots/content/org/onap/logging-analytics/ | ||
| Integration and Testing | Have functional test cases i.e. CSIT been documented in wiki? It should include at least 1 or 2 CSIT that will be run on Lab-xxx-OOM-Daily Jenkins Job | Yes | Provide link to evidence RI jar/war/docker/kubernetes-pod exercising the ELK stack via rest endpoint - ONAP Application Logging Specification v1.2 (Casablanca)#LoggingResults | |
| Have you implemented in Jenkins at least 1 functional test case for each of the project repository? | yes | As an evidence, provide a link to Jenkins (CSIT Jobs) that shows a sample test case implemented (1 job for each repo). AOP WAR wrapper for functional test case - https://git.onap.org/logging-analytics/tree/reference/logging-demo docker image build for FT - https://git.onap.org/logging-analytics/tree/reference/logging-docker-root/logging-docker-demo kubernetes helm chart for FT- https://git.onap.org/logging-analytics/tree/reference/logging-kubernetes - in review (includes filebeat stack) - https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/57171/ | As an example (provided by Integration Team) | |
| Has the project code successfully passed the Build process? | Yes | https://jenkins.onap.org/view/logging-analytics/job/logging-analytics-master-verify-java/ | Goal is to ensure your project latest commits have not broken the build. | |
| Documentation | Has the team identified and outlined the set of documentations to be delivered in this Release? | Yes | Logging Dublin Scope | |
| Security | Has the Release Security/Vulnerability table been updated in the protected Security Vulnerabilities wiki space? | yes | Table in in the protected Security Vulnerabilities wiki space corresponding to the latest NexusIQ scan no change from last release | PTL reviews the NexusIQ scans for their project repos and fills out the vulnerability review table |
| Have all project containers been designed to run as a non-root user? | yes | https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Best+Practices
|
