Dublin Release Plan for VNFRQTS

Owned by Steven wright
Last updated: Dec 11, 2018
5 min read

DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR COMMENTS

The content of this template is expected to be fill out for M1 Release Planning Milestone.


Overview

Project Name

Enter the name of the project

Project Name

Enter the name of the project

Target Release Name

Dublin

Project Lifecycle State

Incubation,  Refer to ONAP Charter, section 3.3 Project Lifecycle for further information

Participating Company 

AT&T Ericsson, Nokia, China Mobile, Amdocs

Scope

What is this release trying to address?



The Dublin release of VNFRQTS project will address the following items:

  • bug fixes, maintenance and feature alignment of VNF Guidelines, VNF Requirements and VNF Test Descriptions consistent with the rest of the ONAP Dublin release.

  • The VNF Provider Use cases for Autoscaling to be documented with associated VNF Requirements

  • The VNF Test Descriptions appendix to be updated to reflect test implementations planned for Dublin by other projects ( VVP, VNFSDK, etc.)

  • Toolchain improvements for the management of VNF Requirements

  • Categorization of VNF Requirements to support ONAP VNF Badging & certification initiatives

Use Cases

The set of E-E use cases for ONAP Dublin release is discussed by the ONAP TSC Use case committee here.

Minimum Viable Product

The ONAp VNFRQTS Project will deliver the following documentation as its minimum viable product:

VNF Guidelines.

VNF Requirements.

VNF Test Descriptions.

VNF Provider Use Cases.

Functionalities

List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.

Epics

type key summary assignee reporter priority status resolution created updated due
Refresh

Stories

type key summary assignee reporter priority status resolution created updated due
Refresh

Longer term roadmap

Indicate at a high level the longer term roadmap. This is to put things into the big perspective.

Release Deliverables

Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.

Deliverable Name

Deliverable Description

Deliverable Name

Deliverable Description

To fill out

To fill out

Sub-Components

List all sub-components part of this release.
Activities related to sub-components must be in sync with the overall release.

Sub-components are repositories and are consolidated in a single centralized place. Edit the Release Components name for your project in the centralized page.

Architecture

High level architecture diagram

At that stage within the Release, the team is expected to provide more Architecture details describing how the functional modules are interacting.

Indicate where your project fit within the ONAP Archiecture diagram.

Block and sequence diagrams showing relation within the project as well as relation with external components are expected.

Anyone reading this section should have a good understanding of all the interacting modules.

Platform Maturity

Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.

Area

Actual Level

Targeted Level for current Release

How, Evidences

Comments

Area

Actual Level

Targeted Level for current Release

How, Evidences

Comments

Performance

NA



VNFRQTS is documentation

  • 0 -- none

  • 1 – baseline performance criteria identified and measured

  • 2 & 3 – performance improvement plans created & implemented

Stability

NA



VNFRQTS is documentation

  • 0 – none

  • 1 – 72 hours component level soak w/random transactions

  • 2 – 72 hours platform level soak w/random transactions

  • 3 – 6 months track record of reduced defect rate

Resiliency

NA



VNFRQTS is documentation

  • 0 – none

  • 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)

  • 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)

  • 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)

Security

NA



VNFRQTS is documentation

  • 0 – none

  • 1 – CII Passing badge + 50% Test Coverage

  • 2 – CII Silver badge; internal communication encrypted; role-based access control and authorization for all calls

  • 3 – CII Gold

Scalability

NA



VNFRQTS is documentation

  • 0 – no ability to scale

  • 1 – single site horizontal scaling

  • 2 – geographic scaling

  • 3 – scaling across multiple ONAP instances

Manageability

NA



VNFRQTS is documentation

  • 1 – single logging system across components; instantiation in < 1 hour

  • 2 – ability to upgrade a single component; tracing across components; externalized configuration management

Usability

1

1

https://docs.onap.org/en/casablanca/guides/onap-provider/index.html

  • 1 – user guide; deployment documentation; API documentation

  • 2 – UI consistency; usability testing; tutorial documentation



  • API Incoming Dependencies

List the API this project is expecting from other projects. N/A to documentation



  • API Outgoing Dependencies

API this project is delivering to other projects.- N/A to documentation

  • Third Party Products Dependencies

Third Party Products mean products that are mandatory to provide services for your components. Development of new functionality in third party product may or not be expected.
List the Third Party Products (OpenStack, ODL, RabbitMQ, ElasticSearch,Crystal Reports, ...). N/A to documentation



  • TESTING AND INTEGRATION PLANS

Provide a description of the testing activities (unit test, functional test, automation,...) that will be performed by the team within the scope of this release. N/A to documentation



  • GAPS

This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.

Gaps identified

Impact

Gaps identified

Impact

To fill out

To fill out

  • KNOWN DEFECTS AND ISSUES

Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.

type key summary assignee reporter priority status resolution created updated due
Refresh

  • RISKS

List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).

Risk identified

Mitigation Plan

Contingency Plan

Risk identified

Mitigation Plan

Contingency Plan

To fill out

To fill out

To fill out

  • RESOURCES

Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.

  • RELEASE MILESTONE

The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.

  • TEAM INTERNAL MILESTONE

This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.

It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.

Date

Project

Deliverable

Date

Project

Deliverable

To fill out

To fill out

To fill out

  • DOCUMENTATION, TRAINING

  • Highlight the team contributions to the specific document related to he project (Config guide, installation guide...).

  • Highlight the team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset

  • High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.

  • Documentation includes items such as:

    • Installation instructions

    • Configuration instructions

    • Developer guide

    • End User guide

    • Admin guide

    • ...


Other Information

  • Vendor Neutral

If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.

  • Free and Open Source Software

FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.

Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.



Charter Compliance

The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.