Control Loop Sub Committee - Beijing Functional Requirements
DRAFT
The following functional requirements are in place for Beijing Release:
There is no mechanism in place for automated triggering of DCAE service assurance deployment, i.e. DCAE microservice instantiation will be driven by CLAMP or be pre-deployed with the DCAE platform
The DCAE Design Studio will not generate any policies
CLAMP expects DCAE Design Studio to:
Onboard any necessary microservices for the flows (together with DCAE team)
Generate TOSCA Service Template describing the flow
Generate Cloudify Blueprint
Store both service template and blueprint in SDC catalog as part of Service/Resource instance
Distribute these service assurance artifacts for consumption by DCAE and CLAMP
Flow type 1: Single (shared) deployment flow
Microservice is deployed once together with DCAE, and provided with multiple configuration policies to support multiple usages.
Example: Correlation Holmes flow
Flow type 2: Multiple (dedicated) deployment flow
Microservice is deployed for every usage by CLAMP
Example: Threshold TCA flow
In both of the above cases, the VES collector is a shared resource that is used by any downstream microservices
Terminology - TODO a separate page?
service assurance vs control loop