OOM meeting notes - 2017-09-27
Agenda:
Updates on OOM development
Global state is that all containers are deployable with OOM. AAF was completed. DCAEg2 deployer onboarded as well.
OOM vs Amsterdam release
Pushing for OOM to be part of the Amsterdam release. Worst case OOM will be part of Amsterdam 1.2.0 release,.
M4 (code freeze) readiness
Question: who is creating the Beijing branches?
Jenkins job in progress to clear the "Nexus binary" blocker
Questions
Should we externalize common values from YAML to have centralized place to have common default values?
One key requirements: need to make sure that each project is independent.
The current proposal allows each individual project or deployment to override a parent value
HELM allows to override default values. A good example could be that there is a default image (staging-latest) but that any project could override the default image with a specific version.
There are inconsistencies in the way image references are made (1 line vs split)
helm recommendation is to split
we will create bugs in JIRA to track and fix the inconsistent references
David from Orange will work with the Integration team to run the OOM project within the Integration team. First objective is to have a CI integration with ONAP, OOM and OPNFV. @Mike Elliott offered to help. He setup OOM in the Integration environment.
There is a project within OPNVF to install k8s on bare metal
Recommendation for David: install a local Nexus server to avoid long download times
@Michael O'Brien is attending a meeting for OPNVF every monday to discuss OOM integration. @David S and @David Blaisonneau to be added to the list by @Michael O'Brien
OOM documentation has been officially added to readthedocs.io.
Consul is now running and available to do health checks on many of the components. The overall health check is targeted for Beijing release.
Next Steps
Formalize the scope for Beijing release. Overall goal for OOM/Beijing is to allow for PRODUCTION (robustness, auto-healing, scaling, etc) and ease of operations.