MSB Release Planning
The content of this template is expected to be fill out for M1 Release Planning Milestone.
Info
Use the "Copy" and "Move" options (available under the ..., top right of this page) to duplicate this template into your project wiki.
Use the Wiki to document the release plan. Don't provide PowerPoint.
Use as much diagrams and flow charts as you need, directly in the wiki, to convey your message.
- 1.1 Info
- 2 Overview
- 3 Scope
- 4 Release Deliverables
- 5 Sub-Components
- 6 ONAP Dependencies
- 7 Architecture
- 8 Testing and Integration Plans
- 8.1 Gaps
- 9 Known Defects and Issues
- 10 Risks
- 11 Resources
- 12 Release Milestone
- 13 Team Internal Milestone
- 14 Documentation, Training
- 14.1 Note
- 15 Other Information
Overview
Project Name | Enter the name of the project |
---|---|
Target Release Name | Amsterdam |
Project Lifecycle State | Incubation |
Participating Company | AT&T, CMCC, IBM, Tech Mahindra, ZTE |
Scope
What is this release trying to address?
Microservices Bus provide key infrastructure functionalities to support ONAP microservice architecture including service registration/discovery, service gateway, service load balancer and service governance. It's a pluggable architecture so it can plugin service provider options like AAF to provide Authentication & Authorization for APIs. Microservices Platform also provides a service portal and service requests logging, tracing and monitoring mechanism, etc.
Use Cases
Service registration per service provider instances
Registration
Service instances are registered to the registry by proxy or themselves. The visible scope should be indicated as a parameter when register. If a service is only internal visible, the service information is only pulled by the internal gateway (aka router & load balancer) and used by other components inside the system, the interal services can't be accessed by external systems or front end(web client). If a service is visible to external system, the service information is pulled by the external gateway and can be accessed by external systems and front end (web client) with auth.
Discovery & Service Consuming
For internal service consumers(Components inside ONAP system, such as A&AI, SO, Controller, etc.)
Client side discovery and load balancing
Server side discovery and load balancing
For external service clients(OSS, BSS, Web client, etc.), access the service via external gateway
Service registration per service
The service may have its own load balancer built inside, for example, Kubernetes can create a load balancer for a service. In such case, only need to register the service LB node to MSB, and the service request from the consumer is routed to the service LB node.Registration
Discovery & Service Consuming
Note: Only show the client side discovery in this diagram for simplicity, it's also possible to use server side discovery by the internal gateway.
Centralized Authentication&Authorization via MSB plugin
MSB is a pluggable architecture, so it can provide centralized authentication & authorization for service request with plugin of auth service provider like AAF.
Minimum Viable Product
Service Registration & Discovery
Service API Gateway(External API Gateway)
Service Router(Internal API Gateway)
Stretch Goal: Integrate with OOM so OOM can register service endpoints to MSB after deploying and starting an ONAP component/service.
Stretch Goal: Integrate with AAF so MSB API Gateway can work with AAF to provide centralized authentication and authorization for ONAP platform.
Stretch Goal: Integrate with for discovery of Dmaap topics in addition to RESTful API’s.
Functionalities
List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.
Epics
Stories
Longer term roadmap
Indicate at a high level the longer term roadmap. This is to put things into the big perspective.
Provide a high performance, high availability microservice infrastructure layer for ONAP platform, including service registration&discovery, service API gateway and service governance.
Release Deliverables
Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.
Deliverable Name | Deliverable Description |
---|---|
Service Discovery | Service Registry,Registration & Discovery |
API Gateway | Can be deployed as external API gateway or router(Internal API gateway) |
API documentation |
|
RESTful API Design Specification | Guideline for ONAP Restful API design |
Sub-Components
List all sub-components part of this release.
Activities related to sub-component must be in sync with the overall release.
Sub-components are repositories are consolidate in a single centralized place. Edit the Release Components name for your project in the centralized page.
ONAP Dependencies
OOM: work with OOM team to register services to MSB after ONAP components are deployed and started by OOM
AAF:work with AAF team to provide centralized authentication an authorization fro ONAP components. (It's just a proposed solution which is under discussion now)
Architecture
High level architecture diagram
At that stage within the Release, the team is expected to provide more Architecture details describing how the functional modules are interacting.
Block and sequence diagrams showing relation within the project as well as relation with external components are expected.
Anyone reading this section should have a good understanding of all the interacting modules.
Sequence diagram
Service Registration & Discovery
User login flow with Auth service provider
(Note: API token may be used for the external systems such as OSS/BSS, however, the generation of API token is not considered to be relevant to MSB(External API Gateway))
External service request flow
(Assumption: the external system(OSS/BSS) or user agent(Browser) already get authenticated and allocated a token, it can be either a user token for ONAP user or an API token for OSS/BSS)
Internal service request flow
Option 1: Service consumer and service provider communicate with each other via Internal API Gateway
Option 2: Service consumer uses MSB client SDK to communicate with service provider directly
API Incoming Dependencies
List the API this release is expecting from other releases.
Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.
Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.
API Name | API Description | API Definition Date | API Delivery date | API Definition link (i.e.swagger) |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
API Outgoing Dependencies
API this release is delivering to other releases.
API Name | API Description | API Definition Date | API Delivery date | API Definition link (i.e.swagger) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Service Registration |
| 6/26/2017 | ||
Service Discovery |
| 6/26/2017 |
Third Party Products Dependencies
Third Party Products mean products that are mandatory to provide services for your components. Development of new functionality in third party product may or not be expected.
List the Third Party Products (OpenStack, ODL, RabbitMQ, ElasticSearch,Crystal Reports, ...).
Name | Description | Version |
---|---|---|
Consul | Consul is a distributed, highly-available, and multi-datacenter aware tool for service discovery, configuration, and orchestration. | 0.8.4 |
OpenResty | OpenResty® is a full-fledged web platform that integrates the standard Nginx core, LuaJIT, many carefully written Lua libraries, lots of high quality 3rd-party Nginx modules, and most of their external dependencies. It is designed to help developers easily build scalable web applications, web services, and dynamic web gateways. | 1.11.2.3 |
Redis | Redis is an in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache and message broker. | 3.2.8 |
In case there are specific dependencies (Centos 7 vs Ubuntu 16. Etc.) list them as well.
Testing and Integration Plans
Provide a description of the testing activities (unit test, functional test, automation,...) that will be performed by the team within the scope of this release.
Describe the plan to integrate and test the release deliverables within the overall ONAP system.
Confirm that resources have been allocated to perform such activities.
Unit test: the goal is 50% coverage for Amsterdam Release.
Functional test: Leverage the robot framework infrastructure to provide functional test.
Integration test: Support integration team to provide the end to end integration test.
All the above should be automation tests run on the LF Jenkins Infrastructure.
Gaps
This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.
Gaps identified | Impact |
---|---|
To fill out | To fill out |
Known Defects and Issues
Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.
Risks
List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).
Risk identified | Mitigation Plan | Contingency Plan |
---|---|---|
MSB needs to work with OOM to register services to MSB service registry, given that OOM is a newly created project, there may be a risk that the cooperation job between MSB and OOM can't be done in the release 1. | Work with OOM team closely and try to put this job in the priority task list of OOM team. | MSB provide Restful APIs and UI Portal so ONAP services can be manually registered. |
Resources
Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.
Release Milestone
The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.
Team Internal Milestone
This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.
It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.
Date | Project | Deliverable |
---|---|---|
To fill out | To fill out | To fill out |
Documentation, Training
Highlight the team contributions to the specific document related to he project (Config guide, installation guide...).
Highlight the team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset
High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.
Documentation includes items such as:
Installation instructions
Configuration instructions
Developer guide
End User guide
Admin guide
...
Note
The Documentation project will provide the Documentation Tool Chain to edit, configure, store and publish all Documentation asset.
MSB team provides the API documentation for the use of ONAP projects. Microservice Bus API Documentation
MSB team provides a draft guideline for RESTful API design for the use of ONP projects, which will be discussed in the community/ arc subcommittee and to be approved by TSC if needed. RESTful API Design Specification
MSB team promise to provide other necessary materials as input according to documentation project's request.
Other Information
Vendor Neutral
All proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. from the seed codes have been removed. If anything new which doesn't comply with this rule is found in the future, the team promise to response and remove it immediately.
Free and Open Source Software
FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.
Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.
Charter Compliance
The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.