DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR COMMENTS
The content of this template is expected to be fill out for M1 Release Planning Milestone.
Use the "Copy" and "Move" options (available under the ..., top right of this page) to duplicate this template into your project wiki. |
Project Name | Application Authorization Framework |
---|---|
Target Release Name | Amsterdam Release |
Project Lifecycle State | incubation |
Participating Company | AT&T, ZTE & IBM |
Organize software authorizations so that applications, tools and services can match the access needed to perform job functions. AAF is designed to cover Fine-Grained Authorization, meaning that the Authorizations provided are able to use an Application's detailed authorizations, such as whether a user may be on a particular page, or has access to a particular Pub-SUB topic controlled within the App.
Use Case: Residential Broadband vCPE (Approved)
Provide authentication and authorization.
List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.
Provide authentication and authorization support for ONAP projects. Add certificate manager which will be used to create certificates.
Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.
Deliverable Name | Deliverable Description |
---|---|
cadi-authz | Source Code / Executable |
cadi-client | Source Code / Executable |
cadi-core | Source Code / Executable |
cadi-cass | Source Code / Executable |
AAF | Docker Image |
REST API | Source Code / API description |
List all sub-components part of this release.
Activities related to sub-component must be in sync with the overall release.
Sub-components are repositories are consolidate in a single centralized place. Edit the Release Components name for your project in the centralized page.
None
List the API this release is expecting from other releases.
Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.
Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.
API Name | API Description | API Definition Date | API Delivery date | API Definition link (i.e.swagger) |
---|---|---|---|---|
API this release is delivering to other releases.
API Name | API Description | API Definition Date | API Delivery date | API Definition link (i.e.swagger) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Any project can use AAF |
Third Party Products mean products that are mandatory to provide services for your components. Development of new functionality in third party product may or not be expected.
List the Third Party Products (OpenStack, ODL, RabbitMQ, ElasticSearch,Crystal Reports, ...).
Name | Description | Version |
---|---|---|
To fill out | To fill out | To fill out |
In case there are specific dependencies (Centos 7 vs Ubuntu 16. Etc.) list them as well.
This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.
Gaps identified | Impact |
---|---|
To fill out | To fill out |
Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.
List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).
Risk identified | Mitigation Plan | Contingency Plan |
---|---|---|
To fill out | To fill out | To fill out |
Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.
The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.
This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.
It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.
Date | Project | Deliverable |
---|---|---|
To fill out | To fill out | To fill out |
The Documentation project will provide the Documentation Tool Chain to edit, configure, store and publish all Documentation asset. |
If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.
FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.
Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.
Charter Compliance
The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.